Tiberius Posted March 8, 2016 Posted March 8, 2016 He was being observant, you overgrown child. And round and round
Dante Posted March 8, 2016 Posted March 8, 2016 (edited) Gee, another Trump story not getting any play yet. Oh, I'm sure once he's the nominee it will get plenty of air time. Surely the Clinton camping wouldn't have anything to say that will make MORE blacks and women not vote for Trump. https://www.yahoo.com/politics/trump-challenged-over-ties-to-mob-linked-gambler-100050602.html Damn the establishment machine is bringing it all. Amazing shite going on right now. I wasn't old enough for Goldwater I imagine they did the same to him. I do remember Reagan. though and the mania was similar but I can't remember it being this bad. I do agree with you this will be in Hillarys arsenal. I'm really becoming afraid that no matter who runs, we are going to be stuck with a dumpy old woman socialist/gangster with a shrill voice in a chairman Mao outfit. Even more amazing shite. Edited March 8, 2016 by Dante
GG Posted March 8, 2016 Posted March 8, 2016 Damn the establishment machine is bringing it all. Amazing shite going on right now. I wasn't old enough for Goldwater I imagine they did the same to him. I do remember Reagan. though and the mania was similar but I can't remember it being this bad. I do agree with you this will be in Hillarys arsenal. I'm really becoming afraid that no matter who runs, we are going to be stuck with a dumpy old woman socialist/gangster with a shrill voice in a chairman Mao outfit. Even more amazing shite. What are you talking about? The vetting of Trump isn't even in the second inning. Why do you think that people who are even modestly knowledgeable about his history were against his candidacy from the start?
TakeYouToTasker Posted March 8, 2016 Posted March 8, 2016 What are you talking about? The vetting of Trump isn't even in the second inning. Why do you think that people who are even modestly knowledgeable about his history were against his candidacy from the start? Never mind the second inning, I'm not sure if they've even played the National Anthem yet.
IDBillzFan Posted March 8, 2016 Posted March 8, 2016 Damn the establishment machine is bringing it all. Amazing shite going on right now. I wasn't old enough for Goldwater I imagine they did the same to him. I do remember Reagan. though and the mania was similar but I can't remember it being this bad. I do agree with you this will be in Hillarys arsenal. I'm really becoming afraid that no matter who runs, we are going to be stuck with a dumpy old woman socialist/gangster with a shrill voice in a chairman Mao outfit. Even more amazing shite. The establishment is doing this before Hillary does. Even a hardcore RINO establishment fool like Lindsey Graham knows the GOP is in better hands with Cruz than Trump...and he absolutely loathes Cruz. Keep also in mind, as you watch the Democratic debates, how soft their discussions are. No one is challenging Hillary. The first thing Sanders does before he answers a question is fluff her pillow and make sure her tea is still warm. The only time she has been under fire is when she blew her top with her regretful "What difference, at this point, does it make," comment. Otherwise, she has skated on everything. Trump will bark a lot of Obama-like memes, and she'll talk about how he has strip clubs in his casinos, but Cruz can beat her on facts, details and substance. Again, he's not my first choice because I prefer a governor over a Senator, but the minute Trump has the nomination, the media that has been playing him non-stop will absolutely turn on him when it's him vs. Hillary. They'll talk about how Benghazi and her email issues are old news, but Trump's hatred of blacks and Latinos and women is deep and historic, and it will be a landslide for Hillary.
GG Posted March 8, 2016 Posted March 8, 2016 Hey lookie here, China is already afraid of Trump, and are killing their economy to prove that he's right. On Tuesday, China reported its largest monthly drop in exports since the financial crisis. The customs administration said exports in February fell 25.4% in dollar terms year-over-year, compared with a drop of 11.2% in January.
1billsfan Posted March 8, 2016 Posted March 8, 2016 (edited) The establishment is doing this before Hillary does. Even a hardcore RINO establishment fool like Lindsey Graham knows the GOP is in better hands with Cruz than Trump...and he absolutely loathes Cruz. Keep also in mind, as you watch the Democratic debates, how soft their discussions are. No one is challenging Hillary. The first thing Sanders does before he answers a question is fluff her pillow and make sure her tea is still warm. The only time she has been under fire is when she blew her top with her regretful "What difference, at this point, does it make," comment. Otherwise, she has skated on everything. Trump will bark a lot of Obama-like memes, and she'll talk about how he has strip clubs in his casinos, but Cruz can beat her on facts, details and substance. Again, he's not my first choice because I prefer a governor over a Senator, but the minute Trump has the nomination, the media that has been playing him non-stop will absolutely turn on him when it's him vs. Hillary. They'll talk about how Benghazi and her email issues are old news, but Trump's hatred of blacks and Latinos and women is deep and historic, and it will be a landslide for Hillary. Did you know that Ted Cruz spoke at a Iowa religious conference and was introduced by a man who advocated the killing of gays? You didn't know this did you? But the media will still ignore this about Ted when he's named the GOP nominee, right? The media's playing you. They would rather not have it be Trump because their attacks don't work on him, they have to make stuff up like his ties to KKK and Hitler. The media would be doing cartwheels if the GOP nominates Cruz because there's actual video of Cruz shaking hands with a man who advocates the killing of gays in America. Edited March 8, 2016 by 1billsfan
Tiberius Posted March 8, 2016 Posted March 8, 2016 Hey lookie here, China is already afraid of Trump, and are killing their economy to prove that he's right. Japan not importing as much?? And, the switch to a domestic market isn't that easy. Rising wages to create consumers hurts exports as prices rise
IDBillzFan Posted March 8, 2016 Posted March 8, 2016 Did you know that Ted Cruz spoke at a Iowa religious conference and was introduced by a man who advocated the killing of gays? You didn't know this did you? But the media will still ignore this about Ted when he's named the GOP nominee, right? The media's playing you. They would rather not have it be Trump because their attacks don't work on him, they have to make stuff up like his ties to KKK and Hitler. The media would be doing cartwheels if the GOP nominates Cruz because there's actual video of Cruz shaking hands with a man who advocates the killing of gays in America. He acknowledged it was a mistake. Will acknowledge it was a mistake again, and adamantly explain how does not believe we should kill gays. What is the GOP candidate going to do? Lose the gay vote? Next.
Tiberius Posted March 8, 2016 Posted March 8, 2016 He acknowledged it was a mistake. Will acknowledge it was a mistake again, and adamantly explain how does not believe we should kill gays. What is the GOP candidate going to do? Lose the gay vote? Next. No, the party of inclusion has no worries over losing gays, minorities or a majority of women. Already lost
IDBillzFan Posted March 8, 2016 Posted March 8, 2016 No, the party of inclusion has no worries over losing gays, minorities or a majority of women. Already lost The GOP tends to be the party of Christianity, so you would not expect gays to generally be a part of the GOP. But Hillary is having a huge problem with most women, who don't understand how she stands up for women's rights while standing by her cheating husband and destroying the lives innocent interns her husband sexually assaulted over and over and over. Tough sell for Hillary. And the GOP knows better than to think they'll immediately be able to unshackle the blacks from the liberal policies which have, over the past seven years, only made things worse for them and, subsequently, made them more dependent on a government for, well, you know...
Tiberius Posted March 8, 2016 Posted March 8, 2016 Women will support Hillary. Heck, the way things are going, Hillary might win every demographic!
Chef Jim Posted March 8, 2016 Posted March 8, 2016 Women will support Hillary. Heck, the way things are going, Hillary might win every demographic! And I know people in pretty much every demographic that really, really, really don't like her. So she'll do a great job of bringing this country together.
Dante Posted March 8, 2016 Posted March 8, 2016 The GOP tends to be the party of Christianity, so you would not expect gays to generally be a part of the GOP. But Hillary is having a huge problem with most women, who don't understand how she stands up for women's rights while standing by her cheating husband and destroying the lives innocent interns her husband sexually assaulted over and over and over. Tough sell for Hillary. And the GOP knows better than to think they'll immediately be able to unshackle the blacks from the liberal policies which have, over the past seven years, only made things worse for them and, subsequently, made them more dependent on a government for, well, you know... I think you underestimate the kind of narrow minded focus of the average liberal you find in the wild. They don't care about any of Hillarys criminal history let alone Bills. And they certainly don't give a shite about Benghazi. For the women the only important thing is she has a vagina and isn't a man. For the metro sexual men that vote for her it's only important she's a socialist. Any means to a end for them. Quit with the logic already it doesn't matter to these guys.
B-Man Posted March 8, 2016 Posted March 8, 2016 Poll: Mitt Romney Helped Donald Trump, More Voters Now More Likely to Support the Billionaire 3/8/2016 Breitbart.com Trump maintains significant national lead, Cruz moves into second place: poll 3/8/2016 MSNBC
GG Posted March 8, 2016 Posted March 8, 2016 Poll: Mitt Romney Helped Donald Trump, More Voters Now More Likely to Support the Billionaire 3/8/2016 Breitbart.com Trump maintains significant national lead, Cruz moves into second place: poll 3/8/2016 MSNBC MSNBC needs to get its act together with the mothership. NBC poll disagrees. Donald Trump holds a narrow, three-point lead in the race for the Republican presidential nomination, a new Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll shows, but the data also reveal potential cracks in his support. ..... But the Journal/NBC News poll suggests that if the race ever becomes a one-on-one match between Mr. Trump and one of his three Republican rivals, his opponent would have the advantage. In hypothetical head-to-head matchups, Messrs. Cruz and Kasich both lead Mr. Trump, 57% to 40%. Mr. Rubio also beats the Republican front-runner, but by a slightly narrower margin of 56% to 43%
IDBillzFan Posted March 8, 2016 Posted March 8, 2016 I think you underestimate the kind of narrow minded focus of the average liberal you find in the wild. They don't care about any of Hillarys criminal history let alone Bills. And they certainly don't give a shite about Benghazi. For the women the only important thing is she has a vagina and isn't a man. For the metro sexual men that vote for her it's only important she's a socialist. Any means to a end for them. Quit with the logic already it doesn't matter to these guys. Yes and no. I recognize the inherent laziness and gimme-gimme mindset of the average SoProg. It's very difficult to fight a large portion of the population who no longer believes in personal accountability, and instead all consider themselves precious snowflakes in need of safe places to whine. It's especially difficult when the SoProg leaders are pulling money from the earners to give to the takers simply in the name of fairness. Hillary -- like Trump -- has really, really, really bad unfavorables, which means unless you're a mindless dolt like gatorman, you'll be inclined to stay home. It's my hope that the earners realize what is at stake and come out to fight. They'll do it for Cruz or Rubio, but they'll never do it for the Trumpsters. They just won't. The only hope is to take out Trump. Or you'll assuredly get four years of Hillary, two or three of her SCOTUS appointees, and from that point all you can do is huddle down, take care of your own, and avoid procreation.
Dante Posted March 8, 2016 Posted March 8, 2016 Yes and no. I recognize the inherent laziness and gimme-gimme mindset of the average SoProg. It's very difficult to fight a large portion of the population who no longer believes in personal accountability, and instead all consider themselves precious snowflakes in need of safe places to whine. It's especially difficult when the SoProg leaders are pulling money from the earners to give to the takers simply in the name of fairness. Hillary -- like Trump -- has really, really, really bad unfavorables, which means unless you're a mindless dolt like gatorman, you'll be inclined to stay home. It's my hope that the earners realize what is at stake and come out to fight. They'll do it for Cruz or Rubio, but they'll never do it for the Trumpsters. They just won't. The only hope is to take out Trump. Or you'll assuredly get four years of Hillary, two or three of her SCOTUS appointees, and from that point all you can do is huddle down, take care of your own, and avoid procreation. Once the US goes down and submits to globalization, get ready for the new dark ages. Not so bad for me but kids and grand kids are going to be in for a crappy world of mindless sheep with the elite using and abusing them.
GG Posted March 8, 2016 Posted March 8, 2016 Once the US goes down and submits to globalization, get ready for the new dark ages. Not so bad for me but kids and grand kids are going to be in for a crappy world of mindless sheep with the elite using and abusing them. Who are these elites are you talking about? People who understand the way the world works and will make sure that their kids obtain a valuable skill or trade, so they can stand of their own two feet?
Dante Posted March 9, 2016 Posted March 9, 2016 Who are these elites are you talking about? People who understand the way the world works and will make sure that their kids obtain a valuable skill or trade, so they can stand of their own two feet? Well I think it's kind of a cabal of crony capitalists, banks, western politicians trying to centralize power controlling wealth among the few. The new royalty exempt from the same laws they suck us dry with. World socialism to domesticate the population by making them dependent. Once this happens motivation is gone. Innovation and production decline turning everywhere into Venezuela. A select few glide on top to do what they want. Obviously a lot more to it but that's the short strokes. I know the stuff of science fiction but what's going on now isn't natural.
Recommended Posts