Tiberius Posted February 29, 2016 Posted February 29, 2016 If I use improper email servers I can't go back and fix it I lose my job. And her job was just a bit more important than mine. So vote for Trump?
Chef Jim Posted February 29, 2016 Posted February 29, 2016 So vote for Trump? Just an FYI those are not my only options. But you knew that and just posted this because.............?
Tiberius Posted February 29, 2016 Posted February 29, 2016 Just an FYI those are not my only options. But you knew that and just posted this because.............? That was the discussion. If it was between the two?
Chef Jim Posted February 29, 2016 Posted February 29, 2016 That was the discussion. If it was between the two? Actually no it was who is worse Hillary or Obama but you knew that too correct?
Tiberius Posted February 29, 2016 Posted February 29, 2016 Actually no it was who is worse Hillary or Obama but you knew that too correct? Would you vote for Trump?
Chef Jim Posted February 29, 2016 Posted February 29, 2016 Would you vote for Trump? Nope and my vote doesn't matter anyway.
DC Tom Posted February 29, 2016 Posted February 29, 2016 No she wasn't. Yes, bad but fixed. Fixed? She maintained government records outside of government control, and maintined classified information in an insecure environment. You don't "fix" that. It's illegal. You can't "fix" that any more than you can argue your way out of a DWI charge by saying "Yeah, but I sobered up later."
B-Man Posted February 29, 2016 Posted February 29, 2016 Fixed? She maintained government records outside of government control, and maintined classified information in an insecure environment. You don't "fix" that. It's illegal. You can't "fix" that any more than you can argue your way out of a DWI charge by saying "Yeah, but I sobered up later." You are correct Tom.................it can't be fixed in the "repair" definition...... But al later meaning could fit.................... adjective: fixed; #3 - influence the outcome of (something, especially a race, contest, or election) by illegal or underhanded means.
Tiberius Posted February 29, 2016 Posted February 29, 2016 (edited) Fixed? She maintained government records outside of government control, and maintined classified information in an insecure environment. You don't "fix" that. It's illegal. You can't "fix" that any more than you can argue your way out of a DWI charge by saying "Yeah, but I sobered up later." No, its like stepping in dog poop and wiping it on a rug Edited February 29, 2016 by gatorman
GG Posted February 29, 2016 Posted February 29, 2016 So who is worse, Obama or Hillary? Obama has already destroyed the country, right? Why don't you ask your overlords? Here and here What's that line about rats abandoning a sinking ship?
Chef Jim Posted February 29, 2016 Posted February 29, 2016 No, its like stepping in dog poop and wiping it on a rub Yeah....just like that.
Tiberius Posted February 29, 2016 Posted February 29, 2016 Why don't you ask your overlords? Here and here What's that line about rats abandoning a sinking ship? Gasp! You mean they were criticized for something??? Yes, that disqualifies Her
keepthefaith Posted February 29, 2016 Posted February 29, 2016 We have to give Trump credit for at least identifying the big issues we face (jobs, debt and spending, immigration, obummercare, national security) and for expressing outrage that the current whitehouse regime and congress aren't doing squat about any of them. For that he should get some good marks. Aside from that, though, I will be stunned if the American electorate will select Trump and Hillary as primary winners to face off to be our next President. Our country should be embarrassed.
TakeYouToTasker Posted February 29, 2016 Posted February 29, 2016 (edited) We have to give Trump credit for at least identifying the big issues we face (jobs, debt and spending, immigration, obummercare, national security) and for expressing outrage that the current whitehouse regime and congress aren't doing squat about any of them. For that he should get some good marks. Aside from that, though, I will be stunned if the American electorate will select Trump and Hillary as primary winners to face off to be our next President. Our country should be embarrassed. Trump should get good marks for appealing to the unwashed, emotion driven electorate with a problem focused mentality? Problem focus, even for someone working at McDonald's, is an undesirable, and completely unpromotable trait. There is no value in it. The value is in solutions, or as we call them as relates to Presidential candidates: policy positions. Trump offers no policy positions, and has a history of assuming leftist positions and off supporting others who embrace leftist policy in the past. Edited February 29, 2016 by TakeYouToTasker
keepthefaith Posted February 29, 2016 Posted February 29, 2016 Trump should get good marks for appealing to the unwashed, emotion driven electorate with a problem focused mentality? Problem focus, even for someone working at McDonald's, is an undesirable, and completely unpromotable trait. There is no value in it. The value is in solutions, or as we call them as relates to Presidential candidates: policy positions. Trump offers no policy positions, and has a history of assuming leftist positions and off supporting others who embrace leftist policy in the past. I think you missed my point but agree with your post.
DC Tom Posted February 29, 2016 Posted February 29, 2016 No, its like stepping in dog poop and wiping it on a rug She broke the law. She can't unbreak it. Trump should get good marks for appealing to the unwashed, emotion driven electorate with a problem focused mentality? Problem focus, even for someone working at McDonald's, is an undesirable, and completely unpromotable trait. There is no value in it. The value is in solutions, or as we call them as relates to Presidential candidates: policy positions. Trump offers no policy positions, and has a history of assuming leftist positions and off supporting others who embrace leftist policy in the past. He's solution focus. He wants to build a wall, and get Mexico to pay for it.
IDBillzFan Posted February 29, 2016 Posted February 29, 2016 For a while now I've been disappointed with the number of conservatives running to Trump's side. Breitbart.com has been one of them. Andrew built his products off the rise of the tea party, and one would expect they would be keen to the crap that is Trump, but they have lately seemed in for him simply because he pisses off the establishment. No more. Today their Editor In Large Ben Shapiro posted a terrific explanation of why Trump is such a bad idea. He is, quite simply, a liar. Go here to watch. It's stellar.
reddogblitz Posted February 29, 2016 Posted February 29, 2016 One real problem that has been fixed and two fake scandals I would argue that having top secret emails on a thumb drive in your lawyers office is, if not treasonous, reckless enough to be a deal breaker IMHO. That along with the Iraq War vote she voted Yes on even though she she couldn't be bothered to read the Intelligence Estimate would be the final nail in the coffin as far as me voting for her anyway.
FireChan Posted February 29, 2016 Posted February 29, 2016 (edited) For a while now I've been disappointed with the number of conservatives running to Trump's side. Breitbart.com has been one of them. Andrew built his products off the rise of the tea party, and one would expect they would be keen to the crap that is Trump, but they have lately seemed in for him simply because he pisses off the establishment. No more. Today their Editor In Large Ben Shapiro posted a terrific explanation of why Trump is such a bad idea. He is, quite simply, a liar. Go here to watch. It's stellar. Shapiro has been writing editorials and bashing Trump for the last year, if not longer. Side note, Marco implying Trump has a tiny pecker has thrown this race into full-on craziness. What a wild ride it's become. Edited February 29, 2016 by FireChan
Recommended Posts