Doc Posted December 7, 2016 Posted December 7, 2016 This guy was man of the year too. So was this guy:
Prickly Pete Posted December 7, 2016 Posted December 7, 2016 (edited) Really? Stalin was the Time Man of the Year twice, too. Time's practice is to choose based on greatest influence, good or bad. Not touchy-feely fluffy bunny bull ****. Yeah man, it's SHOCKING! TIME Magazine is really important to me, too. I just stare at the covers as I sit on the toilet (my old lady was goaded into accepting a year's worth for 25 cents I think), wondering when she will finally throw them out. Lot's of prestigious, prestigionousness in being "Person of the Year". Can't wait for Playboy's "Playmate of the Year", either. Edited December 8, 2016 by HoF Watkins
Chef Jim Posted December 7, 2016 Posted December 7, 2016 Yeah man, it's SHOCKING! TIME Magazine is really important to me, too. I just stare at the covers as I sit on the toilet (my old lady was goaded into accepting a year's worth for .25 cents I think), wondering when she will finally throw them out. Lot's of prestigious, prestigionousness in being "Person of the Year". Can't wait for Playboy's "Playmate of the Year", either. And the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Edition. They still do that don't they?
4merper4mer Posted December 7, 2016 Posted December 7, 2016 And the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Edition. They still do that don't they? Predict the first year a tranny appears in that. Rebecca Romijn doesn't count.
B-Man Posted December 8, 2016 Posted December 8, 2016 (edited) Donald Trump was right. He got incredibly negative press coverage. The Washington Post's The Fix ^ | December 7, 2016 | Chris Cillizza Did Chris have a stroke ? Edited December 8, 2016 by B-Man
DC Tom Posted December 8, 2016 Posted December 8, 2016 Donald Trump was right. He got incredibly negative press coverage. The Washington Post's The Fix ^ | December 7, 2016 | Chris Cillizza Did Chris have a stroke ? No, he's fine. He concludes that it was all Trump's fault.
B-Man Posted December 8, 2016 Posted December 8, 2016 Even anti-Trump working-class voters are having second thoughts New York Post, by Salena Zito Original Article
Azalin Posted December 8, 2016 Posted December 8, 2016 Even anti-Trump working-class voters are having second thoughts New York Post, by Salena Zito Original Article "What is astounding, post-election, is the total lack of contrition Democrats have displayed for ignoring the workingman and -woman bloc that has been the party’s horn of plenty. The only regret they display is that they lost the election, not the voters."
Tiberius Posted December 8, 2016 Posted December 8, 2016 "What is astounding, post-election, is the total lack of contrition Democrats have displayed for ignoring the workingman and -woman bloc that has been the party’s horn of plenty. The only regret they display is that they lost the election, not the voters." Yup, Democrats need to stop promising to help get working people better pay, health care and consumer protections and promise them vague things like making the country somehow great again by building walls...
DC Tom Posted December 8, 2016 Posted December 8, 2016 Yup, Democrats need to stop promising to help get working people better pay, health care and consumer protections and promise them vague things like making the country somehow great again by building walls... You're an idiot.
IDBillzFan Posted December 8, 2016 Posted December 8, 2016 And the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Edition. They still do that don't they? Yes. Except they no longer bother with things like, y'know, swimsuits.
DC Tom Posted December 8, 2016 Posted December 8, 2016 You are insecure You're an idiot. (This macro is great!)
Nanker Posted December 8, 2016 Posted December 8, 2016 Even anti-Trump working-class voters are having second thoughts New York Post, by Salena Zito Original Article "What is astounding, post-election, is the total lack of contrition Democrats have displayed for ignoring the workingman and -woman bloc that has been the party’s horn of plenty. The only regret they display is that they lost the election, not the voters." And further: “The Democratic Party has become a coastal elitist club and if there is any decision or discussion made to broaden that within the ranks it is squashed,” said Dane Strother, a legendary Washington, DC-based Democratic strategist. “We have completely lost touch with Middle America,” he admits, “How did we go from the party of the little man to the party of the elite?” Then he answers; “Yes, we rightfully should protect the rights of minorities, African-Americans, Hispanics, the LBGTQ communities and we always should — but we can’t forget the rest of the country along the way,” he said. Trump's outreach has usurped their stranglehold on the working class. To paraphrase: "What have you got to lose? Because things haven't been going very well for you supporting Democrats." You're an idiot. (This macro is great!) I used to use Quickeys.
Chef Jim Posted December 8, 2016 Posted December 8, 2016 Yup, Democrats need to stop promising to help get working people better pay, health care and consumer protections and promise them vague things like making the country somehow great again by building walls... Yes because better pay, consumer protections and health care promises are not vague.
Tiberius Posted December 8, 2016 Posted December 8, 2016 Yes because better pay, consumer protections and health care promises are not vague. Stop trying to prove Trump supporters are stupid, you are doing too good of a job.
Chef Jim Posted December 8, 2016 Posted December 8, 2016 Stop trying to prove Trump supporters are stupid, you are doing too good of a job. Oh I'm going to love the next four years. Look at how much of a tizzy he's put you folks in over four short weeks.
Tiberius Posted December 8, 2016 Posted December 8, 2016 Oh I'm going to love the next four years. Look at how much of a tizzy he's put you folks in over four short weeks. Me too! I love attacking stupid. And your boy is all stupid
Chef Jim Posted December 8, 2016 Posted December 8, 2016 Me too! I love attacking stupid. And your boy is all stupid No you love attacking Republicans. If you like attacking stupid you'd attack both sides. There is plenty of stupid on both sides.
Azalin Posted December 8, 2016 Posted December 8, 2016 No you love attacking Republicans. If you like attacking stupid you'd attack both sides. There is plenty of stupid on both sides. No, if he liked attacking stupid he'd have hanged himself years ago.
Recommended Posts