Chef Jim Posted July 31, 2016 Posted July 31, 2016 No, I went forward and found one. You see, I'm psychic...or I recognized an obvious trend. Or whatever. Who you voting for? Gonna help make America great again? Nice try Geno but as always you're wrong with your assumptions. Take a look at the post convention poll thread to see just how wrong you are.
Very wide right Posted July 31, 2016 Posted July 31, 2016 We don't need a woman with a 30 year political career with no accomplishments that couldn't get a job as a Home depot manager due to her unethical and criminal behavior. TRUMP 2016!
IDBillzFan Posted July 31, 2016 Posted July 31, 2016 Who you voting for? Gonna help make America great again? He lives in a sanctuary state. His vote doesn't matter here.
GG Posted July 31, 2016 Posted July 31, 2016 Again, it's not a belief in a party as it is the reality that one of them is going to win. You do realize that as well, don't you? Then people shouldn't be complaining about the two party system. If there ever was an election for people too stand up and lob in a protest vote, this is it. To me the shameful part is the 65% who claim to dislike both Clinton and trump, but will still vote for one of them.
Chef Jim Posted July 31, 2016 Posted July 31, 2016 He lives in a sanctuary state. His vote doesn't matter here. Even so I'd still not vote for Trump. But Geno is smarter than all of us so maybe I will. Then people shouldn't be complaining about the two party system. If there ever was an election for people too stand up and lob in a protest vote, this is it. To me the shameful part is the 65% who claim to dislike both Clinton and trump, but will still vote for one of them. So you say that the system runs best as a two party system they say it's shameful when people vote the two party system. So who are you voting for?
Deranged Rhino Posted July 31, 2016 Posted July 31, 2016 So you say that the system runs best as a two party system they say it's shameful when people vote the two party system. So who are you voting for? HRC
ALF Posted July 31, 2016 Posted July 31, 2016 That to what? Don't you want to see what LIAR has in her Wall Street speeches? Considering she rails against them yet has taken $48.5 million from them? I would Iike to see that and Trumps tax returns
/dev/null Posted July 31, 2016 Posted July 31, 2016 HRC I would Iike to see that and Trumps tax returns I haven't figured out yet if you're being dishonest with us or yourself. Probably yourself. You know Hiliary is a terrible candidate and will make a horrible president. But you're going to vote for her anyways and at this point are trying to justify your upcoming vote to yourself
GG Posted July 31, 2016 Posted July 31, 2016 Even so I'd still not vote for Trump. But Geno is smarter than all of us so maybe I will. So you say that the system runs best as a two party system they say it's shameful when people vote the two party system. So who are you voting for? Yes it is a two party system over a long term. That doesn't mean you don't send a message about the candidates the parties threw up. You can effect changes within or without. Some people think that trump is the ultimate agent of change in a corrupt system. I don't disagree with the intent of shaking things up. But I vehemently disagree that trump should be the guy. He has said as much. Where?
Deranged Rhino Posted July 31, 2016 Posted July 31, 2016 Yes it is a two party system over a long term. That doesn't mean you don't send a message about the candidates the parties threw up. You can effect changes within or without. Some people think that trump is the ultimate agent of change in a corrupt system. I don't disagree with the intent of shaking things up. But I vehemently disagree that trump should be the guy. So... then you're voting HRC? Where? Right above, and the fact you've dodged this question every time it's been asked of you, and the fact all the neocons are lining up to support her... Leaves only one real conclusion. You're voting HRC.
ALF Posted July 31, 2016 Posted July 31, 2016 I haven't figured out yet if you're being dishonest with us or yourself. Probably yourself. You know Hiliary is a terrible candidate and will make a horrible president. But you're going to vote for her anyways and at this point are trying to justify your upcoming vote to yourself To be honest , I thought Kasich was the only one qualified to be elected and could work with both parties. I do hate unfair trade deals , which Trump also hates. At this point I won't vote in Nov unless something really tips the scales.
GG Posted July 31, 2016 Posted July 31, 2016 So... then you're voting HRC? Right above, and the fact you've dodged this question every time it's been asked of you, and the fact all the neocons are lining up to support her... Leaves only one real conclusion. You're voting HRC. So if I follow your gator logic, when I slam trump and hrc, and urge people to look more closely at the third party candidates, that means I'm casting my vote for Hilary?
Deranged Rhino Posted July 31, 2016 Posted July 31, 2016 So if I follow your gator logic, when I slam trump and hrc, and urge people to look more closely at the third party candidates, that means I'm casting my vote for Hilary? You also decry the 3rd party option -- so your'e not consistent at all on that point. The one area you have been consistent in though is your refusal to deny you're voting for HRC. Still haven't said no actually, just deflecting... and she's picking up even more neocon support from the establishment. So if I follow your gator logic... And shouldn't we call this GG logic? After all, I'm assuming positions you have despite your posting history, making declarative statements about these and inventing my own spin on them, and passing them off as fact. That's kinda your schtick.
Deranged Rhino Posted July 31, 2016 Posted July 31, 2016 ************ Trump: Putin's 'not gonna go into Ukraine' "He's not going into Ukraine, OK, just so you understand. He's not gonna go into Ukraine, all right? You can mark it down. You can put it down," Trump said Sunday on ABC's "This Week." Host George Stephanopoulos pushed back, saying, "Well, he's already there, isn't he?" "OK, well, he's there in a certain way," Trump responded. http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/289907-trump-incorrectly-says-russia-isnt-in-ukraine
DC Tom Posted July 31, 2016 Posted July 31, 2016 ************ Trump: Putin's 'not gonna go into Ukraine' "He's not going into Ukraine, OK, just so you understand. He's not gonna go into Ukraine, all right? You can mark it down. You can put it down," Trump said Sunday on ABC's "This Week." Host George Stephanopoulos pushed back, saying, "Well, he's already there, isn't he?" "OK, well, he's there in a certain way," Trump responded. http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/289907-trump-incorrectly-says-russia-isnt-in-ukraine You can't tell me he's not just trolling.
Deranged Rhino Posted July 31, 2016 Posted July 31, 2016 You can't tell me he's not just trolling. Exactly. His response after GS pointed out they were already there was a run on sentence of madness.
4merper4mer Posted July 31, 2016 Posted July 31, 2016 I would Iike to see that and Trumps tax returns Then you missed an o
Chef Jim Posted July 31, 2016 Posted July 31, 2016 You can't tell me he's not just trolling. Gator's gone, Donald's rolling. Coincidence? I think not
Deranged Rhino Posted July 31, 2016 Posted July 31, 2016 Gator's gone, Donald's rolling. Coincidence? I think not
Recommended Posts