Observer Posted July 8, 2016 Share Posted July 8, 2016 He can speak for 7 minutes on a topic but expect a lot of repetition. When I was at Trump Arena next to Trump Tower inside the Trump Salon getting a Trump haircut thinking about Trump Largo and my Trump Cruiseline, build a wall. How much time left? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted July 8, 2016 Share Posted July 8, 2016 Trump statement. Click on to enlarge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Hindsight Posted July 8, 2016 Share Posted July 8, 2016 Trump statement. Click on to enlarge. Says the man that wants to build a huge freaking wall and deport everyone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keepthefaith Posted July 8, 2016 Share Posted July 8, 2016 Says the man that wants to build a huge freaking wall and deport everyone We owe illegal immigrants nothing, absolutely nothing and it's obvious that the rightful and lawful thing to do is to stop so many from entering illegally. We're 3 decades and counting late on that one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted July 8, 2016 Share Posted July 8, 2016 Trump statement. Click on to enlarge. That's the first thing I've seen from his campaign that is thought out, coherent, and not bug!@#$ insane. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted July 8, 2016 Share Posted July 8, 2016 That's the first thing I've seen from his campaign that is thought out, coherent, and not bug!@#$ insane. Probably because Trump had nothing to do with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Hindsight Posted July 8, 2016 Share Posted July 8, 2016 We owe illegal immigrants nothing, absolutely nothing and it's obvious that the rightful and lawful thing to do is to stop so many from entering illegally. We're 3 decades and counting late on that one. I'm not talking about the people entering illegally. For him to put out a statement like that after much of his campaign ("I'd like to punch him in the face" for example), just seems disingenuous to me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted July 8, 2016 Share Posted July 8, 2016 Probably because Trump had nothing to do with it. It's not like his campaign staff has proven to be particularly coherent, though. Maybe he got it from Hillary... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted July 8, 2016 Share Posted July 8, 2016 It's not like his campaign staff has proven to be particularly coherent, though. Maybe he got it from Hillary... Good point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted July 8, 2016 Share Posted July 8, 2016 That's the first thing I've seen from his campaign that is thought out, coherent, and not bug!@#$ insane. That's because it was released in written form. They probably wrote it and thought "Y'know what...let's just release this on paper and not take any chances." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted July 8, 2016 Share Posted July 8, 2016 Says the man that wants to build a huge freaking wall and deport everyone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted July 9, 2016 Share Posted July 9, 2016 If he makes Scott Walker his running mate and promises to quit after the election, I'm all in!That'll make two votes for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted July 9, 2016 Share Posted July 9, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Observer Posted July 9, 2016 Share Posted July 9, 2016 That's the first thing I've seen from his campaign that is thought out, coherent, and not bug!@#$ insane. When they start asking him questions next week, the train will get back off the rails. No worries. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted July 9, 2016 Share Posted July 9, 2016 Running Against the Media Probably Won’t Work for Trumpby RAMESH PONNURU Readers of a certain age may remember George H. W. Bush’s delight in 1992 in a bumper sticker that read, “Annoy the Media: Re-Elect Bush.” Newt Gingrich is predicting/advocating that Trump employ the same strategy: “A substantial part of the campaign is going to be–if you think the news media is honest and fair and totally neutral, then you ought to vote for Hillary. But if you think the news media is biased, then join me.” Most people thought that the press was biased back in 1992–a Pew survey found that 63 percent of respondents thought news organizations “tend to favor one side” on social and political questions. That number had risen to 76 percent by 2013, the most recent time Pew appears to have asked the question. In 1992, though, a lot of people who consider the press biased appear not to have thought the issue should determine their vote. Annoying the media, that is, wasn’t high on their list of priorities. If I were Trump or Manafort, I’d want to see some strong evidence that’s changed before making an attack on the media–however much it may sometimes deserve it–a “substantial part of the campaign.” Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/corner Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted July 11, 2016 Share Posted July 11, 2016 Rick Perry: That wall Trump says he's going to build and make Mexico pay for? Ummm, it's really just a virtual wall...not a real wall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted July 12, 2016 Share Posted July 12, 2016 (edited) It's not like his campaign staff has proven to be particularly coherent, though. Maybe he got it from Hillary... Let's look in her sent folder and find out. Oh, wait......... Edited July 12, 2016 by 4merper4mer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted July 13, 2016 Share Posted July 13, 2016 Harvard study: As Trump won, media coverage turned sharply negative. Other than pretty much everyone, who saw this coming? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Miner Posted July 13, 2016 Share Posted July 13, 2016 Harvard study: As Trump won, media coverage turned sharply negative. Other than pretty much everyone, who saw this coming? But that has a Harvard stamp on it, so right or wrong, it's definitely right. Because of the pedigree. Even though others were right, they were wrong, because they lacked the approved name on their resume to come to that conclusion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meazza Posted July 14, 2016 Share Posted July 14, 2016 lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts