Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

He can speak for 7 minutes on a topic but expect a lot of repetition.

 

When I was at Trump Arena next to Trump Tower inside the Trump Salon getting a Trump haircut thinking about Trump Largo and my Trump Cruiseline, build a wall. How much time left?

Posted

Says the man that wants to build a huge freaking wall and deport everyone

We owe illegal immigrants nothing, absolutely nothing and it's obvious that the rightful and lawful thing to do is to stop so many from entering illegally. We're 3 decades and counting late on that one.

Posted

Trump statement.

 

 

Cm2GEHOWEAALaOd.jpg Click on to enlarge.

 

That's the first thing I've seen from his campaign that is thought out, coherent, and not bug!@#$ insane.

Posted

We owe illegal immigrants nothing, absolutely nothing and it's obvious that the rightful and lawful thing to do is to stop so many from entering illegally. We're 3 decades and counting late on that one.

I'm not talking about the people entering illegally.

 

For him to put out a statement like that after much of his campaign ("I'd like to punch him in the face" for example), just seems disingenuous to me

Posted

 

Probably because Trump had nothing to do with it.

 

It's not like his campaign staff has proven to be particularly coherent, though.

 

Maybe he got it from Hillary...

Posted

 

That's the first thing I've seen from his campaign that is thought out, coherent, and not bug!@#$ insane.

 

That's because it was released in written form. They probably wrote it and thought "Y'know what...let's just release this on paper and not take any chances."

Posted

 

That's the first thing I've seen from his campaign that is thought out, coherent, and not bug!@#$ insane.

 

When they start asking him questions next week, the train will get back off the rails. No worries.

Posted

Running Against the Media Probably Won’t Work for Trump

by RAMESH PONNURU

 

Readers of a certain age may remember George H. W. Bush’s delight in 1992 in a bumper sticker that read, “Annoy the Media: Re-Elect Bush.” Newt Gingrich is predicting/advocating that Trump employ the same strategy: “A substantial part of the campaign is going to be–if you think the news media is honest and fair and totally neutral, then you ought to vote for Hillary. But if you think the news media is biased, then join me.”

 

Most people thought that the press was biased back in 1992–a Pew survey found that 63 percent of respondents thought news organizations “tend to favor one side” on social and political questions. That number had risen to 76 percent by 2013, the most recent time Pew appears to have asked the question. In 1992, though, a lot of people who consider the press biased appear not to have thought the issue should determine their vote. Annoying the media, that is, wasn’t high on their list of priorities. If I were Trump or Manafort, I’d want to see some strong evidence that’s changed before making an attack on the media–however much it may sometimes deserve it–a “substantial part of the campaign.”

 

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/corner

Posted (edited)

It's not like his campaign staff has proven to be particularly coherent, though.

 

Maybe he got it from Hillary...

Let's look in her sent folder and find out. Oh, wait......... Edited by 4merper4mer
×
×
  • Create New...