DC Tom Posted May 27, 2016 Posted May 27, 2016 Oh well................ Dumbass. That's WHY you debate the second-place finisher. To marginalize Her Royal Highness and Her Lady Privy Seal.
/dev/null Posted May 27, 2016 Posted May 27, 2016 It will be refreshing when the media awakens and starts reporting on homelessness and hunger and poverty in America and demanding to know what Trump is going to do about it. Odd how homelessness, hunger, and poverty in America are always an epidemic during Republican administrations. It's like these things don't exist during Democratic administrations
IDBillzFan Posted May 28, 2016 Posted May 28, 2016 Dumbass. That's WHY you debate the second-place finisher. To marginalize Her Royal Highness and Her Lady Privy Seal. Do you notice how the more this moron speaks before he thinks, the less you see his supporters around here? The entire Trump presidency could literally be "Make a statement on Monday. Spend the rest of the week explaining away the comment until he gets to Friday, when he makes a statement such as "I like banana splits! They're amazing." It's like watching gatorman run for president.
keepthefaith Posted May 28, 2016 Posted May 28, 2016 Dumbass. That's WHY you debate the second-place finisher. To marginalize Her Royal Highness and Her Lady Privy Seal. Agree but Trump's handlers have probably correctly calculated that Bernie would eat him up in the debate. Bernie would cream him in terms of style, genuiness and knowing the subject matter.
B-Man Posted May 28, 2016 Posted May 28, 2016 Dumbass. That's WHY you debate the second-place finisher. To marginalize Her Royal Highness and Her Lady Privy Seal. Dan Riehl tweets an interesting take: “think chess not checkers. It’s a thing of beauty, he’s now saying he won’t debate Bernie but he sure elevated him.” It should certainly put a little wind in Bernie’s sails for the last phase of the far left’s internecine version of 2008’s “Operation Chaos.” 32
OCinBuffalo Posted May 28, 2016 Posted May 28, 2016 (edited) Dan Riehl tweets an interesting take: “think chess not checkers. It’s a thing of beauty, he’s now saying he won’t debate Bernie but he sure elevated him.” It should certainly put a little wind in Bernie’s sails for the last phase of the far left’s internecine version of 2008’s “Operation Chaos.” 32 The only dumbass here is the person who doesn't realize that this was Trump's goal all along, and that he never had any intention of actually debating Sanders. Why would you give Sanders the legitmacy of standing on the stage with you? You wouldn't. Legitimizing Sanders is a bridge too far. No. The right thing to do is get Bernie's name in the paper, re-energize Berners, and keep the establishment Ds, Debbie Wasserman Schultz and the Clinton campaign in hell(right were they belong, btw) for at least another month. For all we know, this, + Nevada, could keep them in hell right through the convention and beyond. The best part is: the scapegoats are, once again, the media, who are now "too stingy to put up enough money for charity", out of an event that everybody knows would have had SB-like ratings, would have scored them many times the $10 million Trump required. Thus, Trump's story was always as plausible as it was planned. Trump gets what he wants, and on top of that, he's maniupulated the professional whiners in the media and on the left...into whining, AGAIN. Yet another cry of wolf. I'd say the question of whether this is checkers or chess depends on the IQ of the observer, first, and then their affectation and/or perspective. But that is trivialized when we consider the results. This is masterful politics. This is far beyond beating the Ds at their own Saul Alinsky game. This is something as different as it is better...because of the simplicity of its design. Meanwhile, the NYT is trying to tell us chaos is running amok in Trump's HQ? Is that what we see here? Chaos? Or do we see desgin? Once again, much depends on the IQ of the observer. Edited May 28, 2016 by OCinBuffalo
DC Tom Posted May 28, 2016 Posted May 28, 2016 Do you notice how the more this moron speaks before he thinks, the less you see his supporters around here? The entire Trump presidency could literally be "Make a statement on Monday. Spend the rest of the week explaining away the comment until he gets to Friday, when he makes a statement such as "I like banana splits! They're amazing." It's like watching gatorman run for president. It's not quite that bad. I'll bet Trump can read a pie chart.
OCinBuffalo Posted May 28, 2016 Posted May 28, 2016 Do you notice how the more this moron speaks before he thinks, the less you see his supporters around here? The entire Trump presidency could literally be "Make a statement on Monday. Spend the rest of the week explaining away the comment until he gets to Friday, when he makes a statement such as "I like banana splits! They're amazing." It's like watching gatorman run for president. Don't confuse me dealing with a major new international partner who wants to deploy our stuff to every client they have.... ...with not being around here because of Trump speaking/thinking/etc. I am working on a few posts I think will be helpful to you. We'll see.
1billsfan Posted May 28, 2016 Posted May 28, 2016 It will be refreshing when the media awakens and starts reporting on homelessness and hunger and poverty in America and demanding to know what Trump is going to do about it. Like politics, “the media” is changing rapidly. Trumps presidential campaign has driven that change into hyperspeed. Thanks to Trump, “the media” has lost serious control and influence. They’ve thrown everything at Trump and it doesn’t stick because Trump constantly does or says something that they’ll be forced to cover the very next day or risk looking like they’re a day late and a dollar short. Many old war horse pundits are just completely dumbfounded at Trumps rise and success in the presidential election. They simply don’t understand that Americans 55 years old and younger have been programmed for the fast paced, no nonsense, don’t bore me presidential candidate that is Trump. It’s funny now that Scott Walker was the first guy to drop out of the race. Walker was the “cookie cutter”, bore you to tears presidential candidate which has become a dinosaur in this modern age of 24/7 social media.
Tiberius Posted May 29, 2016 Posted May 29, 2016 Trump university ordered by judge to release internal documents that might show how his fraud works. Trump responded to the situation by calling the judge a Mexican. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/judge-orders-release-of-internal-trump-university-documents/2016/05/28/2e960e5e-24f9-11e6-8690-f14ca9de2972_story.html?hpid=hp_hp-top-table-main_trumpuniversity-730pm%3Ahomepage%2Fstory
B-Man Posted May 29, 2016 Posted May 29, 2016 Trump to spend Memorial Day weekend with bikers at Rolling Thunderwww.usatoday.com/story/news/. In House GOP, Ryan endorsement of Trump seen as inevitable.
Tiberius Posted May 29, 2016 Posted May 29, 2016 Trump wants to cut social security but won't tell his followers now http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donald-trump-supports-cutting-social-security-report-says_us_5749db63e4b0dacf7ad515e4
Observer Posted May 29, 2016 Posted May 29, 2016 In House GOP, Ryan endorsement of Trump seen as inevitable. We'll soon see if Ryan has balls or a vagina, but I agree: He's already sold his soul.
B-Man Posted May 30, 2016 Posted May 30, 2016 Lots of talk this weekend about a Romney/Kasich independent run................. Good Lord, they just never learn.
Dorkington Posted May 30, 2016 Posted May 30, 2016 Trump to spend Memorial Day weekend with bikers at Rolling Thunder www.usatoday.com/story/news/. In House GOP, Ryan endorsement of Trump seen as inevitable. He made the claim that 600,000 people were 'trying to get to' his speech. I have to laugh at that as someone who lives here.
Doc Posted May 30, 2016 Posted May 30, 2016 Lots of talk this weekend about a Romney/Kasich independent run................. Good Lord, they just never learn. It's not a matter of them learning. They know what they'd be doing. And the scariest part is they'd rather have Shrillary as president.
birdog1960 Posted May 30, 2016 Posted May 30, 2016 We'll soon see if Ryan has balls or a vagina, but I agree: He's already sold his soul. if he had a vagina, he'd call out trump on his disgusting act. we need more vaginas. vaginas are good.
/dev/null Posted May 30, 2016 Posted May 30, 2016 if he had a vagina, he'd call out trump on his disgusting act. . if he had a vagina his name would be Paula vaginas are good. Never met one i didn't like
Deranged Rhino Posted May 30, 2016 Posted May 30, 2016 It's not a matter of them learning. They know what they'd be doing. And the scariest part is they'd rather have Shrillary as president. Nail on the head. The coronation will go on as planned.
ALF Posted May 30, 2016 Posted May 30, 2016 (edited) Donald Trump supposedly told House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) he supports cutting Social Security but will not admit it publicly because it would hurt his election chances, according to a report in Bloomberg BusinessWeek http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donald-trump-supports-cutting-social-security-report-says_us_5749db63e4b0dacf7ad515e4 http://www.bloomberg.com/features/2016-reince-priebus/ This gives Clinton and Democrats running for Congress a hot button issue to run on. Edited May 30, 2016 by ALF
Recommended Posts