Chef Jim Posted April 12, 2016 Posted April 12, 2016 What does that mean, a "creation"? What in the hell are you trying to say? That the media benefits from his story (you are the one that says they are in it for the money) so they run it incessantly.
Tiberius Posted April 12, 2016 Posted April 12, 2016 That the media benefits from his story (you are the one that says they are in it for the money) so they run it incessantly. There are tons of morons out there in the media but very few that run for President
reddogblitz Posted April 12, 2016 Posted April 12, 2016 Ah yeah, this has been Trump's shtick forever. That's why nyc media should bear most of the blame for this. He hasn't changed an iota and they had no problem giving him a megaphone over the last thirty years. Now they're reaping what they've sowed. Trump is right when he says Bernie is getting screwed out of delegates too.
TakeYouToTasker Posted April 12, 2016 Posted April 12, 2016 Trump is right when he says Bernie is getting screwed out of delegates too.No he isn't. "Getting screwed" implies undeserved results obtained outside of the rules.
reddogblitz Posted April 12, 2016 Posted April 12, 2016 No he isn't. "Getting screwed" implies undeserved results obtained outside of the rules. OK, Bernie's getting screwed by the Democrat partY and it's idiotic "rules". How else can you explain hIm beating Hillary by 12 points IN Wyoming yet the delegates are awarded evenly. Throw in the "Super Delegates" and Hillary wins. Slice it how you want it, but it's a screw IMHO.
TakeYouToTasker Posted April 12, 2016 Posted April 12, 2016 OK, Bernie's getting screwed by the Democrat partY and it's idiotic "rules". How else can you explain hIm beating Hillary by 12 points IN Wyoming yet the delegates are awarded evenly. Throw in the "Super Delegates" and Hillary wins. Slice it how you want it, but it's a screw IMHO.Bernie is a sitting Senator and member of the power elite within the Democratic Party. He knows the rules related to his own Party's nominating process, and he agreed to them when he decided to run for the Democratic nomination. He made the choice to run a a Democrat instead of a Socialist for the benefit of using the establishment apparatus instead of being honest and fighting an uphill battle as a third party candidate. He's not getting screwed.
reddogblitz Posted April 12, 2016 Posted April 12, 2016 He's not getting screwed. Just keep saying that if it makes you feel better. The system is rigged. That's why the rules are the way they are. Sound like you're good with that.
TakeYouToTasker Posted April 12, 2016 Posted April 12, 2016 Just keep saying that if it makes you feel better. The system is rigged. That's why the rules are the way they are. Sound like you're good with that. The Democratic and Republican Parties are private organizations. They are not part of the government. Further, you are not required to vote for a candidate of either party; nor are the candidates required to run as a Republican or Democrat. No one is getting screwed. The outcome is the final summation of free will.
reddogblitz Posted April 12, 2016 Posted April 12, 2016 (edited) The Democratic and Republican Parties are private organizations. They are not part of the government.This sounds like a Hillary thing. Dermocrats and Republicans are not part of the government, it's members are. Everything they do and every decision they make is based on party affiliation. And yes Pollyanna, you don't have to be a D or R to win public office. I'm with Trump on this one,"It's a rigged, disgusting, dirty system." And just because those are the rules, does not mean it's not "a rigged, disgusting, dirty system." Edited April 13, 2016 by reddogblitz
TakeYouToTasker Posted April 13, 2016 Posted April 13, 2016 This sounds like a Hillary thing. Dermocrats and Republicans are not part of the government, it's members are. Everything they do and every decision they make is based on party affiliation. And yes Pollyanna, you don't have to be a D or R to win public office. So, you agree with me, but you don't like the outcome. Great. Advocate for your preferred candidates better.
Joe Miner Posted April 13, 2016 Posted April 13, 2016 Everyone knows about journalistic duty. All journalists have to adhere to it after they take the Hippocratic oath. Isn't the New York Post journalistic doody?
DC Tom Posted April 13, 2016 Posted April 13, 2016 Are you drunk? No. Why? If I were, would you start making sense?
GG Posted April 13, 2016 Posted April 13, 2016 This sounds like a Hillary thing. Dermocrats and Republicans are not part of the government, it's members are. Everything they do and every decision they make is based on party affiliation. And yes Pollyanna, you don't have to be a D or R to win public office. I'm with Trump on this one,"It's a rigged, disgusting, dirty system." And just because those are the rules, does not mean it's not "a rigged, disgusting, dirty system." In other words, he should get all the benefits of running on a ticket of a major party and all the groundwork and organization that it has in place for a candidate under its banner, but complain about the rules? The party nominating process is totally different than the general election. This is precisely why the parties did not like primaries historically, and why Dems hope on to the Super delegates for dear life.
reddogblitz Posted April 13, 2016 Posted April 13, 2016 So, you agree with me, but you don't like the outcome. Great. Advocate for your preferred candidates better. I fail to see how we agree about anything you said. Please explain.
Nanker Posted April 13, 2016 Posted April 13, 2016 Zuckerberg takes shots at Trump's wall. Okay then, Zuckerberg buys 4 neighboring houses... for "privacy". Life is so splendid when you're a billionaire and can tell everyone else how to live their lives.
Tiberius Posted April 13, 2016 Posted April 13, 2016 Zuckerberg takes shots at Trump's wall. Okay then, Zuckerberg buys 4 neighboring houses... for "privacy". Life is so splendid when you're a billionaire and can tell everyone else how to live their lives. Hey, the $30 million was his that he owned. And the houses will actually work at getting him more privacy. The wall? Well, funded by my taxes and it won't even work.
Chef Jim Posted April 13, 2016 Posted April 13, 2016 (edited) Hey, the $30 million was his that he owned. And the houses will actually work at getting him more privacy. The wall? Well, funded by my taxes and it won't even work. So now you finally understand how we feel about a lot of government agencies/projects. Welcome to the club. Oh and BTW your tax dollars have likely subsidized his homes. Edited April 13, 2016 by Chef Jim
Tiberius Posted April 13, 2016 Posted April 13, 2016 So now you finally understand how we feel about a lot of government agencies/projects. Welcome to the club. Finally? You have followed the war on drugs debate, yes? Iraq War debate? Conservatives sure know how to spend the tax payers doe
Recommended Posts