DC Tom Posted April 1, 2016 Posted April 1, 2016 I guess I always figured that on customer reviews they would be obvious trolls but on political message boards it hardly seems worth it. Who the hell is going to change their minds here? Russia has an entire government agency dedicated to trolling message boards. Not that I think you're working for the FSB. They have higher standards.
Ozymandius Posted April 1, 2016 Posted April 1, 2016 So does Israel: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_Internet_Defense_Force
Tiberius Posted April 1, 2016 Posted April 1, 2016 Russia has an entire government agency dedicated to trolling message boards. Not that I think you're working for the FSB. They have higher standards. Does B Mans 30 cut and paste jobs a day make you suspicious? Or do only left leaning posts raise suspecion?
DC Tom Posted April 1, 2016 Posted April 1, 2016 Does B Mans 30 cut and paste jobs a day make you suspicious? Or do only left leaning posts raise suspecion? What? What am I suspicious of? What the !@#$ are you talking about now, dumbass?
Azalin Posted April 1, 2016 Posted April 1, 2016 I just had the old link on the clip board (from and hour before) and didn't copy new link, that's all. Big crime! But you would get bent out of shape about a simple mistake. You HAVE to. Someone like you simply has no choice but to try and jump on a small mistake and make more out of it than it is. You would never be able to dissect on complicated argument. You never really contribute anything interesting or intelligent to any debate. You can't! Who's angry? I'm thankful I'm not a drooling simpleton, and I enjoy pointing out that you are.
GG Posted April 1, 2016 Posted April 1, 2016 Does B Mans 30 cut and paste jobs a day make you suspicious? Or do only left leaning posts raise suspecion? There's a huge difference. He provides a voluminous amount of links that are germane to a subject and doesn't derail an existing conversation. Now apply that to your day job.
Deranged Rhino Posted April 1, 2016 Posted April 1, 2016 Russia has an entire government agency dedicated to trolling message boards. Not that I think you're working for the FSB. They have higher standards. True. "Larry" claims the MSS has the most robust "troll factory" and that the US is aspiring to match it. Not sure if that's true or not, I only spent a very brief time with the guy, but everything else he told me checked out. There was also a large section of the Snowden leaks that dealt with the US's use of trolls: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-07-02/government-trolls-are-using-psychology-based-influence-techniques-youtube-facebook-a "Edward Snowden revealed that the unit had engaged in “dirty tricks” like deploying sexual “honey traps” designed to discredit targets, launching denial-of-service attacks to shut down Internet chat rooms, pushing veiled propaganda onto social networks and generally warping discourse online. (snip) Particularly disturbing to me is the phrase “domestic extremist groups”. What does someone have to say or do to be considered an “extremist”? For example, the English Defence League is a non-violent street protest movement in the UK that is strongly against the spread of radical Islam and sharia law in the UK. So if they are “extremists”, how many millions upon millions of ordinary citizens in the United States would fit that definition? When conducting operations against “extremists”, psychology-based influence techniques are among the tools that JTRIG uses to combat them online. The following comes from one of the documents that was posted by Greenwald and Fishman… In other words, these government trolls try to mess with people’s minds. And here is another document that was posted by Greenwald and Fishman that talks about how JTRIG uses YouTube, Facebook and Twitter to accomplish their goals… It is very disturbing to think that some of the people that we may be interacting with on YouTube, Facebook and Twitter are actually paid government agents that are purposely trying to feed us propaganda and misinformation." More here, including Greenwald's original article: https://theintercept.com/2015/06/22/controversial-gchq-unit-domestic-law-enforcement-propaganda/ More: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/apr/02/russia-troll-factory-kremlin-cyber-army-comparisons
DC Tom Posted April 1, 2016 Posted April 1, 2016 True. "Larry" claims the MSS has the most robust "troll factory" and that the US is aspiring to match it. Not sure if that's true or not, I only spent a very brief time with the guy, but everything else he told me checked out. There was also a large section of the Snowden leaks that dealt with the US's use of trolls: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-07-02/government-trolls-are-using-psychology-based-influence-techniques-youtube-facebook-a "Edward Snowden revealed that the unit had engaged in “dirty tricks” like deploying sexual “honey traps” designed to discredit targets, launching denial-of-service attacks to shut down Internet chat rooms, pushing veiled propaganda onto social networks and generally warping discourse online. (snip) Particularly disturbing to me is the phrase “domestic extremist groups”. What does someone have to say or do to be considered an “extremist”? For example, the English Defence League is a non-violent street protest movement in the UK that is strongly against the spread of radical Islam and sharia law in the UK. So if they are “extremists”, how many millions upon millions of ordinary citizens in the United States would fit that definition? When conducting operations against “extremists”, psychology-based influence techniques are among the tools that JTRIG uses to combat them online. The following comes from one of the documents that was posted by Greenwald and Fishman… In other words, these government trolls try to mess with people’s minds. And here is another document that was posted by Greenwald and Fishman that talks about how JTRIG uses YouTube, Facebook and Twitter to accomplish their goals… It is very disturbing to think that some of the people that we may be interacting with on YouTube, Facebook and Twitter are actually paid government agents that are purposely trying to feed us propaganda and misinformation." More here, including Greenwald's original article: https://theintercept.com/2015/06/22/controversial-gchq-unit-domestic-law-enforcement-propaganda/ More: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/apr/02/russia-troll-factory-kremlin-cyber-army-comparisons "Paid government agents?" What about the Clinton campaign?
Tiberius Posted April 1, 2016 Posted April 1, 2016 There's a huge difference. He provides a voluminous amount of links that are germane to a subject and doesn't derail an existing conversation. Now apply that to your day job. You are full of it. Your bias is so great, your capacity for objectivity so small Who's angry? I'm thankful I'm not a drooling simpleton, and I enjoy pointing out that you are. You are a simpleton, that's all I know. Its obvious,, because You can't make any serious arguments. You cant
GG Posted April 1, 2016 Posted April 1, 2016 Lookie here, now that your day job is outed you actually have to engage in something more than cutting and pasting
Tiberius Posted April 1, 2016 Posted April 1, 2016 Lookie here, now that your day job is outed you actually have to engage in something more than cutting and pasting i just cut and paste? Oh, that's right, you have trouble seeing anything past your emotional bias.
DC Tom Posted April 1, 2016 Posted April 1, 2016 i just cut and paste? Oh, that's right, you have trouble seeing anything past your emotional bias. Do you even understand what irony is?
IDBillzFan Posted April 1, 2016 Posted April 1, 2016 Do you even understand what irony is? Hey...he listens to Sheryl Crow. He knows irony, okay?
/dev/null Posted April 1, 2016 Posted April 1, 2016 (edited) There's a huge difference. He provides a voluminous amount of links that are germane to a subject and doesn't derail an existing conversation. Now apply that to your day job. While I do agree with the overall premise of your argument, I do find fault in your style. This is a Trump thread. Your opening statement should have been: The difference is yuuuuuuge! His links are great, you're gonna love 'em Edited April 1, 2016 by /dev/null
GG Posted April 1, 2016 Posted April 1, 2016 While I do agree with the overall premise of your argument, I do find fault in your style. This is a Trump thread. Your opening statement should have been: The difference is yuuuuuuge! His links are great, you're gonna love 'em Not only are they great, they are the best and finest links that the Internet has ever seen and you will be so proud of donald after you click those links.
drinkTHEkoolaid Posted April 2, 2016 Posted April 2, 2016 Not only are they great, they are the best and finest links that the Internet has ever seen and you will be so proud of donald after you click those links. Trust me you'll see, you'll see. Its what plants crave. More links. Were going to copy more links and they're going to read them , they're going to read them.
Ozymandius Posted April 2, 2016 Posted April 2, 2016 #TheChalkening is great: https://twitter.com/hashtag/TheChalkening?src=hash He's giving courageous college crimethinkers a weapon to fight back. Trump's the most important political figure to come along in several decades. LAtimes article about the Trumpenyouth in college
DC Tom Posted April 2, 2016 Posted April 2, 2016 #TheChalkening is great: https://twitter.com/hashtag/TheChalkening?src=hash He's giving courageous college crimethinkers a weapon to fight back. Trump's the most important political figure to come along in several decades. LAtimes article about the Trumpenyouth in college I hope you fall to your death in a Pinto wagon.
GG Posted April 2, 2016 Posted April 2, 2016 I hope you fall to your death in a Pinto wagon. Without the passenger telling him he always loved him
Recommended Posts