Gene Frenkle Posted April 1, 2016 Author Posted April 1, 2016 It doesn't seem like it right now, but this is a MUCH better time for the GOP than the DNC. Trump and his posse of slightly-smarter-than-racist-skinheads put the GOP in a position of forced self-scrutiny and evaluation. The correction to the error, assuming it is genuine, should be deep and relatively long-lasting. It's one of the most difficult things for most entities to do -- be they politicians, small business owners, and even slightly-smarter-than-racist-skinheads -- in any genuine and meaningful manner. Who knows what Trump will cost the GOP this round. But whatever it is, it will be farther along the field of self-correction than what gatorman, etc. gladly accept from their party: completely settling for either an old, haggard, angry white socialist with absolutely no chance of winning, or an old, haggard, angry white female 1%er who is not only under FBI investigation for lying under oath about sending classified emails over an unsecure server, but is someone who laundered millions of foreign funds through her "foundation' for a Russian uranium deal while acting as SoS, all while turning Libya over to ISIS. For all Trump's faults, he'll disappear shortly and the GOP will be left with a self-corrected bench while the DNC will continue to have, y'know, two very old, angry white people to turn to for leadership. Holy crap! It finally makes sense. The GOP is tanking in 2016. You guys should hire Tim Murray. Who do you think they'll draft?
FireChan Posted April 1, 2016 Posted April 1, 2016 By "cucked" he means: doesn't hate blacks and Jews enough. In case anyone was wondering, "cucked" apparently stems from a term used to describe white men who have a sexual desire to watch their wives be !@#$ed by black men. He is litterally stating that those who disagree with his politics enjoy being emasculated by black men. If I'm not mistaken, I believe it's derived from cuckold, which doesn't have racial undertones. It doesn't seem like it right now, but this is a MUCH better time for the GOP than the DNC. Trump and his posse of slightly-smarter-than-racist-skinheads put the GOP in a position of forced self-scrutiny and evaluation. The correction to the error, assuming it is genuine, should be deep and relatively long-lasting. It's one of the most difficult things for most entities to do -- be they politicians, small business owners, and even slightly-smarter-than-racist-skinheads -- in any genuine and meaningful manner. Who knows what Trump will cost the GOP this round. But whatever it is, it will be farther along the field of self-correction than what gatorman, etc. gladly accept from their party: completely settling for either an old, haggard, angry white socialist with absolutely no chance of winning, or an old, haggard, angry white female 1%er who is not only under FBI investigation for lying under oath about sending classified emails over an unsecure server, but is someone who laundered millions of foreign funds through her "foundation' for a Russian uranium deal while acting as SoS, all while turning Libya over to ISIS. For all Trump's faults, he'll disappear shortly and the GOP will be left with a self-corrected bench while the DNC will continue to have, y'know, two very old, angry white people to turn to for leadership. This is the craziest level of idealism I've ever seen on the board. And I'm including 19-0 predictions.
Observer Posted April 1, 2016 Posted April 1, 2016 If I'm not mistaken, I believe it's derived from cuckold, which doesn't have racial undertones. Oz is a "fake persona" poster so it's save to assume this particular term was meant to incite. Don't get sucked in: The fake poster act has now been done here for 20 years. The new incarnations are poor copies of the original.
Tiberius Posted April 1, 2016 Posted April 1, 2016 Just how bad are Donald Trump’s problems with women? Bad enough that roughly seven out of 10 women voters in recent polls say they have a negative impression of him. And that was before the news coverage of his threat to “spill the beans” about Ted Cruz’s wife and his talk about punishing women who have abortions. Trump is already so dangerously underwater with female voters — who represent a majority of the electorate -- that it raises questions about whether a GOP ticket led by the billionaire could lead to a historic gender gap and blowout defeat. Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/03/donald-trump-women-unfavorable-ratings-221433#ixzz44a60JoLB
Tiberius Posted April 1, 2016 Posted April 1, 2016 Border agents and Trump! Sorry if this was already posted Just how bad are Donald Trump’s problems with women? Bad enough that roughly seven out of 10 women voters in recent polls say they have a negative impression of him. And that was before the news coverage of his threat to “spill the beans” about Ted Cruz’s wife and his talk about punishing women who have abortions. Trump is already so dangerously underwater with female voters — who represent a majority of the electorate -- that it raises questions about whether a GOP ticket led by the billionaire could lead to a historic gender gap and blowout defeat. Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/03/donald-trump-women-unfavorable-ratings-221433#ixzz44a60JoLB
3rdnlng Posted April 1, 2016 Posted April 1, 2016 Border agents and Trump! Sorry if this was already posted Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/03/donald-trump-women-unfavorable-ratings-221433#ixzz44a60JoLB Yes, you phucking idiot, you posted it an hour ago. Maybe you should check and make sure your multiple handlers aren't giving you the same story to send out.
meazza Posted April 1, 2016 Posted April 1, 2016 Border agents and Trump! Sorry if this was already posted Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/03/donald-trump-women-unfavorable-ratings-221433#ixzz44a60JoLB What does this have to do with border agents?
GG Posted April 1, 2016 Posted April 1, 2016 Border agents and Trump! Sorry if this was already posted Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/03/donald-trump-women-unfavorable-ratings-221433#ixzz44a60JoLB YOU POSTED IT ONLY AN HOUR BEFORE, IDIOT
IDBillzFan Posted April 1, 2016 Posted April 1, 2016 Holy crap! It finally makes sense. The GOP is tanking in 2016. It will come as a surprise to exactly no one that one of the most devout disciples of the angry, old, white 1%er DNC presidential candidates would read what I wrote and absolutely, positively, and completely miss my point. Feel the Bern, Geno! Grab your walker, your Depends and your Geritol and get out the vote!!!
Azalin Posted April 1, 2016 Posted April 1, 2016 Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/03/donald-trump-women-unfavorable-ratings-221433#ixzz44a60JoLB Border agents and Trump! Sorry if this was already posted Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/03/donald-trump-women-unfavorable-ratings-221433#ixzz44a60JoLB Sorry if this was already posted? You're not aware that you posted this very same article, with the exact same quote, only 58 minutes prior to posting it again? Really??? You're charting new territory with this one. Congratulations.
IDBillzFan Posted April 1, 2016 Posted April 1, 2016 (edited) Sorry if this was already posted? You're not aware that you posted this very same article, with the exact same quote, only 58 minutes prior to posting it again? Really??? You're charting new territory with this one. Congratulations. When your job each day is to copy and paste comments and links provided to you by your overlords, it's not surprising he forgot he already posted it at this website. Edited April 1, 2016 by LABillzFan
Azalin Posted April 1, 2016 Posted April 1, 2016 When your job each day is to copy and paste comments and links provided to you by your overlords, it's not surprising he forgot he already posted it at this website. If that's not the case, then he's even dumber than I had previously thought him to be.
DC Tom Posted April 1, 2016 Posted April 1, 2016 Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/03/donald-trump-women-unfavorable-ratings-221433#ixzz44a60JoLB Border agents and Trump! Sorry if this was already posted Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/03/donald-trump-women-unfavorable-ratings-221433#ixzz44a60JoLB You're an idiot. Sorry if this was already posted.
IDBillzFan Posted April 1, 2016 Posted April 1, 2016 Not a fan of April Fools Day, but this is pretty good: Daily Wire Endorses Trump. We believe him when he says he will bring jobs back from Mexico and China by raising tariffs and threatening war. We believe him when he says he will build a wall on the border with Mexico by making Mexico pay for it, using withdrawal of his tie manufacture as leverage. We agree with you that Trump will scare Putin into submission by withdrawing from NATO, scare ISIS into submission by turning over prosecution of the war to Putin, and solve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict by cutting great deals. We think Trump will be the best for the military by cutting military spending and teaching soldiers to torture people in violation of law and also informing them that they will be treated as losers if they are captured as prisoners of war. We think Donald Trump’s hands are beautiful and that he drives a golf ball 275 yards. We believe Donald Trump turned a small $1 million loan into a $10 billion empire, that Trump has never inflated his wealth, that Trump Steaks are delicious and that Trump Water is the best kind of water ever made. We believe all parents should send their children to Trump University to learn how to do these kinds of things. We think Ted Cruz is Lyin’ Ted and that he had sex not just with the five women named by theNational Enquirer, but all the women who support him and not Trump, since the only reason those stupid women wouldn’t support handsome and charming Trump is that they are having sex with his opponent. We think Donald Trump is the best for women including Amanda Carpenter, who should probably have an affair with Donald Trump if she wants to show him how honest she is, because otherwise she is a cuckservative.
Tiberius Posted April 1, 2016 Posted April 1, 2016 Oops, well, at least it gave you morons something to get your angry butts in a swirl about. National Border Patrol Council Endorses Donald Trump ... www.theatlantic.com/...border-patrol...endorses-trump/4760... The Atlantic 2 days ago - In an unprecedented move Wednesday, the National Border Patrol Council announced that it is endorsing Donald Trump, a candidate it touts ... Better Marsha?
3rdnlng Posted April 1, 2016 Posted April 1, 2016 Oops, well, at least it gave you morons something to get your angry butts in a swirl about. National Border Patrol Council Endorses Donald Trump ... www.theatlantic.com/...border-patrol...endorses-trump/4760... The Atlantic 2 days ago - In an unprecedented move Wednesday, the National Border Patrol Council announced that it is endorsing Donald Trump, a candidate it touts ... Better Marsha? If you weren't such a constant little prick I would feel sorry for your mental deficiencies and profound laziness. It's amazing that a person would post here without bothering to read what they posted. I guess the other possibility is that your mind is so far gone (or maybe never there) that you can't remember that you read something and posted it just an hour prior. Pathetic.
Tiberius Posted April 1, 2016 Posted April 1, 2016 If you weren't such a constant little prick I would feel sorry for your mental deficiencies and profound laziness. It's amazing that a person would post here without bothering to read what they posted. I guess the other possibility is that your mind is so far gone (or maybe never there) that you can't remember that you read something and posted it just an hour prior. Pathetic. Oh vent, if it makes you feel better. You need something, obviously
Ozymandius Posted April 1, 2016 Posted April 1, 2016 It's not that you're far off, it's that you're a muppet who views everything along racial lines. I think I view the appropriate amount of issues along racial lines, actually. But, in any case, it's better to err on the side of thinking too racially instead of not thinking about race at all. For example: Education: 3 Approaches To Higher Test Scores 1. Liberal Progressive - "We need to spend more money! These poor children don't have enough money!" 2. Cuckservative / LOLbertarian - "Muh Charter Schools! Muh School Vouchers!" 3. Nationalist - "You know, we actually don't have an education problem at all. We have good schools. The only reason the USA ranks low in comparison to China or Finland is because we have waaaay more Latinos and Blacks than those countries do. Our Latinos and Blacks drag down the overall average; our Whites, Asians, and Jews excel at testing. In an apples vs apples comparison, we don't do any worse than the top countries." The third perspective is desperately needed in American politics. Gee, I wonder why China, Singapore, and Japan top these lists. Could it be that their countries are full of Asians?
Chef Jim Posted April 1, 2016 Posted April 1, 2016 Border agents and Trump! Sorry if this was already posted Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/03/donald-trump-women-unfavorable-ratings-221433#ixzz44a60JoLB Oops, well, at least it gave you morons something to get your angry butts in a swirl about. National Border Patrol Council Endorses Donald Trump ... www.theatlantic.com/...border-patrol...endorses-trump/4760... The Atlantic 2 days ago - In an unprecedented move Wednesday, the National Border Patrol Council announced that it is endorsing Donald Trump, a candidate it touts ... Better Marsha? Angry? No kind of sad for someone who posts something an hour after posting it and apologizing if it had already been posted. And at this time of the day you can't blame alcohol......or can you?? Wait, wait, wait. I get it. This is your April Fool's joke isn't it? Decent on but not great. Seeing this is your day you'd think you could do better. But then again it's still early. You're an idiot. Sorry if this was already posted.
3rdnlng Posted April 1, 2016 Posted April 1, 2016 Oh vent, if it makes you feel better. You need something, obviously No, I'm not venting and you have nothing. You seem to think that it is perfectly ok to either mindlessly post stuff you haven't read or try to debate stuff when you are armed with an IQ of a rock.
Recommended Posts