keepthefaith Posted June 15, 2016 Share Posted June 15, 2016 (edited) Okay, Trumpettes. The Donald is now arguing that people on the no-fly list should be banned from buying guns. This is the ridiculous position of the left, which sees no need for due process. We've told you Trumpettes repeatedly...Trump is a Democrat. You're being played. We already exclude people from buying guns without due process. Some with mental illness for example. Aren't they being excluded by being on a list? Edited June 15, 2016 by keepthefaith Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drinkTHEkoolaid Posted June 16, 2016 Share Posted June 16, 2016 We already exclude people from buying guns without due process. Some with mental illness for example. Aren't they being excluded by being on a list? Not sure if it's true, but I heard a story about a guy being denied his ny pistol permit, allegedly, because he went through a stressful divorce and was dealing with anxiety related to that event and was on anti anxiety medication. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted June 16, 2016 Share Posted June 16, 2016 We already exclude people from buying guns without due process. Some with mental illness for example. Aren't they being excluded by being on a list? Yes, they are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted June 16, 2016 Share Posted June 16, 2016 We already exclude people from buying guns without due process. Some with mental illness for example. Aren't they being excluded by being on a list? I would like to see specific samples of this, but you can't lose your rights without due process, so whatever it is you're referring to, if we ARE taking away rights without due process, then I have a problem with that as well. We just spent four years listening to phucktards say they were okay with Obama's executive actions because someone else did something like it. We don't need to be that phucktard just because we're pissed about the GOP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reddogblitz Posted June 16, 2016 Share Posted June 16, 2016 I would like to see specific samples of this, but you can't lose your rights without due process, so whatever it is you're referring to, if we ARE taking away rights without due process, then I have a problem with that as well. This article says Federal law prohibits anyone from buying a gun that has been adjudicated as mentally ill. http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/20/us/20cnd-guns.html?_r=0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted June 16, 2016 Share Posted June 16, 2016 This article says Federal law prohibits anyone from buying a gun that has been adjudicated as mentally ill. http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/20/us/20cnd-guns.html?_r=0 Sounds like the adjudication is the requisite due process. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted June 16, 2016 Share Posted June 16, 2016 This article says Federal law prohibits anyone from buying a gun that has been adjudicated as mentally ill. I understand that there are going to be disagreements but how in the hell can the Feds get away with claiming a hunk of wood and metal is crazy? It is an inanimate object. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted June 16, 2016 Share Posted June 16, 2016 This article says Federal law prohibits anyone from buying a gun that has been adjudicated as mentally ill.http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/20/us/20cnd-guns.html?_r=0Or what others refer to as due process. Is it possible none of you guys in favor of this understand what due process is about? I mean, the left understands because they prefer you have NO rights at all. But some of you (not you...everyone knows you're a leftist) better pay attention, because Trump's inner-liberal is coming out, and all you're doing is trying to justify it. Be careful what you wish for... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Observer Posted June 16, 2016 Share Posted June 16, 2016 Or what others refer to as due process. Is it possible none of you guys in favor of this understand what due process is about? I mean, the left understands because they prefer you have NO rights at all. But some of you (not you...everyone knows you're a leftist) better pay attention, because Trump's inner-liberal is coming out, and all you're doing is trying to justify it. Be careful what you wish for... The only ideology that defines Trump is Trump-ism. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unbillievable Posted June 16, 2016 Share Posted June 16, 2016 (edited) The GOP has already lost this election. Both principle candidates are liberal nutjobs. If people don't vote third party in this election, it's never going to happen. Edited June 16, 2016 by unbillievable Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted June 16, 2016 Share Posted June 16, 2016 Or what others refer to as due process. Is it possible none of you guys in favor of this understand what due process is about? I mean, the left understands because they prefer you have NO rights at all. To Leftists, due process is the Government says so Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted June 16, 2016 Share Posted June 16, 2016 The only ideology that defines Trump is Trump-ism. Because God forbid we call liberal tendencies liberal tendencies. Let's call everything bad Trumpinations. Not that you think liberal tendencies are bad...just that anyone who thinks anything is bad........Trump. This way we can achieve Reagan's vision of the shining city on the Hill. Notice he didn't say mountain or plateau or summit.....he said Hill. Coincidence? You think not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted June 16, 2016 Share Posted June 16, 2016 Because God forbid we call liberal tendencies liberal tendencies. Let's call everything bad Trumpinations. Not that you think liberal tendencies are bad...just that anyone who thinks anything is bad........Trump. This way we can achieve Reagan's vision of the shining city on the Hill. Notice he didn't say mountain or plateau or summit.....he said Hill. Coincidence? You think not. Of course it's not a coincidence. Hill has less syllables. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sodbuster Posted June 16, 2016 Share Posted June 16, 2016 The GOP has already lost this election. Both principle candidates are liberal nutjobs. If people don't vote third party in this election, it's never going to happen. *Principal It's an important distinction, because it seems like the two principal candidates have no principles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted June 16, 2016 Share Posted June 16, 2016 So what's the over and under on Trump's loss? On the electoral college map I'm going with 350. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted June 16, 2016 Share Posted June 16, 2016 So what's the over and under on Trump's loss? On the electoral college map I'm going with 350. Ask again after Russia releases HilLIARy's emails. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted June 16, 2016 Share Posted June 16, 2016 Ask again after Russia releases HilLIARy's emails. It will be interesting to say the least. Here's a biased, but frightening read if true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
\GoBillsInDallas/ Posted June 16, 2016 Share Posted June 16, 2016 Trump coming to Dallas today Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted June 16, 2016 Share Posted June 16, 2016 Trump coming to Dallas today The Trump Show Hits Dallas, Protest Organizers Ban Mexican Flags. 6/16/16: Dallas Police Practice Riot Control Ahead of Trump Visit... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted June 16, 2016 Share Posted June 16, 2016 The Trump Show Hits Dallas, Protest Organizers Ban Mexican Flags. 6/16/16: Dallas Police Practice Riot Control Ahead of Trump Visit... They should burn some Mexican flags. It will be interesting to say the least. Here's a biased, but frightening read if true. From your linky thingy: " That essay mentions the Valerie Plame case where a CIA officer’s name was identified by Bush Administration White House aide Scooter Libby. Plame was no longer working under cover. Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald convicted Libby on perjury charges, not for revealing Plame’s name. However, Fitzgerald thought his prosecution served a national security purpose. “The notion,” Fitzgerald said, “that someone’s identity could be compromised lightly, to me, compromises the ability to recruit [i.e., for the US to recruit intelligence officers].” I agreed with Fitzgerald. Covert intelligence work is difficult. Intelligence officers—who by the very nature of their work are fully engaged in protecting U.S. national security—are vulnerable. In Hillary Clinton’s judgment, protecting her political viability was more important than protecting U.S. national security. Keeping her work-related communications from the clutches of federal record maintenance laws and the Freedom of Information Act was more important than following the laws protecting the handling of national security-related information." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts