bisonbrigade Posted November 19, 2015 Posted November 19, 2015 One good hit by Hughes or Mario Williams and the Bills could give Brady his well deserved suspension, IR. If I were the Bills I would hit Brady hard early and often. Do not worry if Brady released the ball, do not worry about late hits or personal fouls. Just hit Brady as hard as you can as often as you can. Like his next pass would not be completed for 15 yards anyhow. Even if you don't knock him out, you can't tell me it would not rattle a player to know the other team does not worry about flags or late hits. It justs wants to inflict pain on you. After the first quarter, watch how Brady plays when that sinks in to his brain.
Canadian Bills Fan Posted November 19, 2015 Posted November 19, 2015 One good hit by Hughes or Mario Williams and the Bills could give Brady his well deserved suspension, IR. If I were the Bills I would hit Brady hard early and often. Do not worry if Brady released the ball, do not worry about late hits or personal fouls. Just hit Brady as hard as you can as often as you can. Like his next pass would not be completed for 15 yards anyhow. Even if you don't knock him out, you can't tell me it would not rattle a player to know the other team does not worry about flags or late hits. It justs wants to inflict pain on you. After the first quarter, watch how Brady plays when that sinks in to his brain. I'm sure this is every teams plan but its easier said than done CBF
PromoTheRobot Posted November 19, 2015 Posted November 19, 2015 It's a two way street. You take out their guy and yours is fair game.
bisonbrigade Posted November 19, 2015 Author Posted November 19, 2015 It's a two way street. You take out their guy and yours is fair game. Without Brady New England is done. I'm sure this is every teams plan but its easier said than done CBF Not the way it should be done. Ignore the run and send 6 or 7 players on every play until Brady's jersey in nice and dirty. Sure they might burn you with screens and draws, but it's not like those yards would not come anyhow.
MarkAF43 Posted November 19, 2015 Posted November 19, 2015 Without Brady New England is done. And without Taylor, we're done. No thanks, keep the game clean.
bisonbrigade Posted November 19, 2015 Author Posted November 19, 2015 And without Taylor, we're done. No thanks, keep the game clean. Taylor is more mobile, a clean game is a loss.
Canadian Bills Fan Posted November 19, 2015 Posted November 19, 2015 And without Taylor, we're done. No thanks, keep the game clean. Oh man i dont even want to think how the game would go with EJ playing CBF
MarkAF43 Posted November 19, 2015 Posted November 19, 2015 Taylor is more mobile, a clean game is a loss. So your plan is to win dirty by attempting to injure him? That's low. I'd rather lose clean than win dirty.
Buffalos#1Fan Posted November 19, 2015 Posted November 19, 2015 It's a two way street. You take out their guy and yours is fair game. Our team would easily win in a fight against those pansies.
BuffaloBillsMagic1 Posted November 19, 2015 Posted November 19, 2015 Let's ne serious here. Our pash rush won't get within 2 feet of Brady no matter our leader schemes.
BillsFan-4-Ever Posted November 19, 2015 Posted November 19, 2015 (edited) Oh man i dont even want to think how the game would go with EJ playing CBF Does it matter? A loss is a loss no matter who plays. It can't be any different than facing the better Bengals team. Edited November 19, 2015 by BillsFan-4-Ever
bills_fan_in_raleigh Posted November 19, 2015 Posted November 19, 2015 I think we can rush just the four DL and cover with 7. Having someone shadow Gronk and prevent him from releasing from LOS same wit Amendola than just cover everyone else TIGHT!!!
RevWarRifleman Posted November 19, 2015 Posted November 19, 2015 Taylor is more mobile, a clean game is a loss. And so is a game with lots of late-hit penalties.
bills_fan_in_raleigh Posted November 19, 2015 Posted November 19, 2015 So your plan is to win dirty by attempting to injure him? That's low. I'd rather lose clean than win dirty. your playing the cheaters they win by cheating we can win by dirty :-)
RevWarRifleman Posted November 19, 2015 Posted November 19, 2015 Taylor is more mobile, a clean game is a loss. And so is a game with lots of late-hit penalties.
NorthBuffaloKid Posted November 19, 2015 Posted November 19, 2015 There's a fine line between making Brady worry about the pass rush and becoming a dirty team. I would like o see Brady on his keister as much as anyone, but not at the expense of becoming a dirty team. We can win without having to resort to dirty tactics. GO BILLS!!
Storm Front Posted November 19, 2015 Posted November 19, 2015 The Pats would just plug in another guy and not miss a beat, a la Cassell.
Over 29 years of fanhood Posted November 19, 2015 Posted November 19, 2015 We can win without having to resort to dirty tactics. Not so much...
MarkAF43 Posted November 19, 2015 Posted November 19, 2015 Agree. Even if we try to hit him late, it will be so slow that Brady will have already exited the field of play before our guys can locate him. We are better off hoping that he slips on a mat in the tunnel. Can we get someone to make it slippery for him? give him a push or something?
bisonbrigade Posted November 19, 2015 Author Posted November 19, 2015 So your plan is to win dirty by attempting to injure him? That's low. I'd rather lose clean than win dirtyW My plan is to win. yours is to loose with dignity. You don'r need to injure him, just let him know that you want too. There is no dignity in loosing.
Recommended Posts