Refugee Crisis in the U. S. (?)

[boyst]

^^^

And this is what Clarence Thomas wants to address. A district judge holding the entire country hostage over their snowflake bull####. Only a retard would agree with the judge that the question shouldn't be asked.

[3rdnlng]

1 hour ago, Boyst62 said:

^^^

And this is what Clarence Thomas wants to address. A district judge holding the entire country hostage over their snowflake bull####. Only a retard would agree with the judge that the question shouldn't be asked.

Guess what Gleeful Gator thinks?

[boyst]

1 hour ago, 3rdnlng said:

Guess what Gleeful Gator thinks?

He thinks???

[3rdnlng]

1 minute ago, Boyst62 said:

He thinks???

He thinks he thinks.

[Foxx]

53 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

He thinks he thinks.

ah, but if no one is around to see the smoke emanating from his ears, did it really happen?

[3rdnlng]

13 minutes ago, Foxx said:

ah, but if no one is around to see the smoke emanating from his ears, did it really happen?

He talks out his ass.

[boyst]

54 minutes ago, Foxx said:

ah, but if no one is around to see the smoke emanating from his ears, did it really happen?

 

Edited January 15, 2019 by Boyst62

[njbuff]

Remember, it’s a MANUFACTURED crisis, nothing to see here.

[Prickly Pete]

I'm kind of surprised that I have never seen it mentioned, but if you live in Los Angeles you have certainly noticed these EYESORE gates that line the streets of every crappy Latino neighborhood. They are EVERYWHERE! On many streets they run continuously down both sides of the street.  These were all built by Mexican homeowners to keep each other out.

 

NO ONE LOVES A ***** GATE AROUND THEIR HOME MORE THAN A MEXICAN HOMEOWNER!

 

 

Just plop down into Norwalk on Google Street View....

 

 

 

https://www.google.com/maps/@33.9066416,-118.1537654,3a,75y,97.29h,82.68t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sb0yo4YxQuFlWzAvQ-hKiZw!2e0!7i16384!8i8192

 

 

 

Edited January 16, 2019 by OJ Tom

[B-Man]

As new U.S.-bound caravan grows to more than 2,000, Mexicans lash out by Elizabeth Llorente

Original Article

As a new caravan that began in Honduras and quickly swelled to an estimated 2,000 people made its way toward Mexico on Tuesday, Mexicans who live along the border towns that will likely be most affected took to the Internet to lash out against another wave of migrants.        .

[Koko78]

12 hours ago, B-Man said:

As new U.S.-bound caravan grows to more than 2,000, Mexicans lash out by Elizabeth Llorente

Original Article

As a new caravan that began in Honduras and quickly swelled to an estimated 2,000 people made its way toward Mexico on Tuesday, Mexicans who live along the border towns that will likely be most affected took to the Internet to lash out against another wave of migrants.        .

 

Maybe they should build a wall.

[Prickly Pete]

1 hour ago, Koko78 said:

 

Maybe they should build a wall.

 

I bet they really want to, but will wait until Trump is out of office.

[3rdnlng]

Mexico is building a wall along their southern border and they are going to pay for it.

[njbuff]

It’s downright amazing how hypocritical the Democrats are on this issue (amongst just about every other issue).

 

It was a crisis when other administrations were in office, but because it’s Trump, it’s a manufactured crisis.

 

Truly pathetic on the left’s part only to shut down Trump and for cheap political gain.

[The_Dude]

Why Violence Is Better

 

https://www.foxnews.com/us/nearly-250-illegal-immigrants-arrested-in-new-mexico-after-crossing-border-seeking-medical-care-border-patrol-says.amp

 

Imagine if we had armed border guards who shot 12-20 of these people as they were crossing and denied them aid. That would have dispersed the other 230 and they would have flown back south, tail tucked, as quickly as their crappy shoes can carry them. But this option makes people cry. 

 

So instead were on the hook for providing them shelter, court dates, food, and medical care. What’s that going to cost us? Millions? And clearly our resistance to properly protect our frontiers is encouraging more migrant groups to come. That is going to result in the millions turning to billions. 

 

And what are the effects on these caravans? They cause crime and issues all through Mexico and everywhere else they go. They’re literally disrupting the global economy. 

 

How many future migrants will die on their trek to our border?

 

Start calculating these costs and then ask what would be better, 10-20 shot future drywallers / hotel maids that would be a strain on our infrastructure and schools.....or the continuation of the status quo which is good for nobody and the billions that it’s costing us? Cause it could all be avoided with a $10 box of ammo. 

 

If you look at the long term I’d argue deadly force against invaders is the most benevolent action. 

 

But I find most people consider what I say to be a “not nice” and so they won’t even hear out the merits of my argument which aren’t wrong. 

 

I say these people have no right to inflict the financial burden on us that they are and that is enough of a casus belli in itself. 

 

 

Edited January 17, 2019 by The_Dude

[3rdnlng]

1 hour ago, The_Dude said:

Why Violence Is Better

 

https://www.foxnews.com/us/nearly-250-illegal-immigrants-arrested-in-new-mexico-after-crossing-border-seeking-medical-care-border-patrol-says.amp

 

Imagine if we had armed border guards who shot 12-20 of these people as they were crossing and denied them aid. That would have dispersed the other 230 and they would have flown back south, tail tucked, as quickly as their crappy shoes can carry them. But this option makes people cry. 

 

So instead were on the hook for providing them shelter, court dates, food, and medical care. What’s that going to cost us? Millions? And clearly our resistance to properly protect our frontiers is encouraging more migrant groups to come. That is going to result in the millions turning to billions. 

 

And what are the effects on these caravans? They cause crime and issues all through Mexico and everywhere else they go. They’re literally disrupting the global economy. 

 

How many future migrants will die on their trek to our border?

 

Start calculating these costs and then ask what would be better, 10-20 shot future drywallers / hotel maids that would be a strain on our infrastructure and schools.....or the continuation of the status quo which is good for nobody and the billions that it’s costing us? Cause it could all be avoided with a $10 box of ammo. 

 

If you look at the long term I’d argue deadly force against invaders is the most benevolent action. 

 

But I find most people consider what I say to be a “not nice” and so they won’t even hear out the merits of my argument which aren’t wrong. 

 

I say these people have no right to inflict the financial burden on us that they are and that is enough of a casus belli in itself. 

 

 

You clearly were born in the wrong time. I think you would fit into this picture nicely:

[The_Dude]

25 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

You clearly were born in the wrong time. I think you would fit into this picture nicely:

 

I do NOT appreciate that one bit. 

The very thought of France is unsettling to me. Unless of course I'm marching with the 10th Legion and killing the ***** out of some Gauls -- because that'd be cool. 

But I'm not wrong. It'd be kinder to the thousands, and thousands, of future "refugees" if we just shot a handful of people right now we'd save thousands in the future the misery of fruitless trek. What I'm advocating for is just ripping the bandaid off, but this country always wants to pull it slowly which only increases the pain and cost. 

[3rdnlng]

2 minutes ago, The_Dude said:

 

I do NOT appreciate that one bit. 

The very thought of France is unsettling to me. Unless of course I'm marching with the 10th Legion and killing the ***** out of some Gauls -- because that'd be cool. 

But I'm not wrong. It'd be kinder to the thousands, and thousands, of future "refugees" if we just shot a handful of people right now we'd save thousands in the future the misery of fruitless trek. What I'm advocating for is just ripping the bandaid off, but this country always wants to pull it slowly which only increases the pain and cost. 

Listen, if you want to scare them enough to not come to our border then do it right. They can get shot in their own country, but the guillotine would really make them think twice. Piker.

[Foxx]

22 minutes ago, The_Dude said:

 

I do NOT appreciate that one bit. 

The very thought of France is unsettling to me. Unless of course I'm marching with the 10th Legion and killing the ***** out of some Gauls -- because that'd be cool. 

But I'm not wrong. It'd be kinder to the thousands, and thousands, of future "refugees" if we just shot a handful of people right now we'd save thousands in the future the misery of fruitless trek. What I'm advocating for is just ripping the bandaid off, but this country always wants to pull it slowly which only increases the pain and cost. 

i wonder when your book reading adventures will get to, 'Mary Poppins' so that we might all benefit from diatribes from that perspective.

[The_Dude]

1 hour ago, Foxx said:

i wonder when your book reading adventures will get to, 'Mary Poppins' so that we might all benefit from diatribes from that perspective.

 

I'm kind of a "non-fiction" guy.