B-Man Posted February 10, 2017 Author Posted February 10, 2017 Urbana man charged with living, voting in U.S. illegally http://www.news-gazette.com/news/local/2017-02-10/urbana-man-charged-living-voting-us-illegally.html URBANA — A Mexican national who has lived in Urbana since 2005, allegedly using a stolen identity, was arraigned Thursday on seven federal counts, including four related to voting by an illegal immigrant. Miguel Valencia-Sandoval, 33, who allegedly had been using the identity of a Texas man named Ramiro G. Vasquez, pleaded not guilty to the charges before Magistrate Eric Long at U.S. District Court in Urbana Same as the woman deported from Phoenix, using a stolen false identity.
B-Man Posted February 10, 2017 Author Posted February 10, 2017 (edited) There's nothing stopping "so-called president" Trump from retracting the unconstitutional EO and creating a new one that is vetted by the Justice and Homeland Security departments to meet constitutional requirements, except for his ego that prevents him from admitting he is wrong. So stupid and (small) ham-handed. Hey look, President Trump is going to take Pasta Joe's advice............... BREAKING. Is Trump Planning To Issue A New Travel Order? Moot & reboot: White House working on replacement travel-pause EO? NBC: Trump Administration Rewriting Immigration Executive Order Edited February 10, 2017 by B-Man
B-Man Posted February 11, 2017 Author Posted February 11, 2017 CHANGE: ‘We’re going to see more’: Sanctuary cities cave in face of Trump’s funding threats. Unidentified 9th Circuit Judge seeks vote on further review of panel Order AT THE NINTH CIRCUIT, a sua sponte motion for en banc rehearing of the immigration decision. Note that even if the court doesn’t go for rehearing, this opens it up for unhappy judges on the 9th who weren’t on the original 3-judge panel to file blistering dissents. Which will be there for the Supreme Court to read if it reviews the panel decision.
Nanker Posted February 11, 2017 Posted February 11, 2017 Remember how upset baskin was when those took place? Neither does anyone else. You're a lame ass hypocrite, baskin. But at least he isn't a Democrat shill nor a partisan. We have his word on that.
B-Man Posted February 11, 2017 Author Posted February 11, 2017 California Asks For $100B Despite Refusal To Enforce Immigration Laws. California officials may not be happy with President Trump’s immigration orders, but they are eager to get a piece of the $1 trillion infrastructure plan that he has promised. State officials proposed a list of infrastructure projects on Wednesday that would require $100 billion in federal funds. Some of the projects include improving roads, bridges, levees, ports and public transportation according to the Los Angeles Times. Although California Democrats have been critical of President Trump’s immigration policies, state officials have praised his massive infrastructure proposal. Trump promised to repair roads and bridges across the country in his inaugural address and California Gov. Jerry Brown responded last month in his State of the State address: “And I say, ‘Amen to that, man. Amen to that, brother.’” Now that’s a high-speed gravy train.
DC Tom Posted February 18, 2017 Posted February 18, 2017 California Asks For $100B Despite Refusal To Enforce Immigration Laws. California officials may not be happy with President Trump’s immigration orders, but they are eager to get a piece of the $1 trillion infrastructure plan that he has promised. State officials proposed a list of infrastructure projects on Wednesday that would require $100 billion in federal funds. Some of the projects include improving roads, bridges, levees, ports and public transportation according to the Los Angeles Times. Although California Democrats have been critical of President Trump’s immigration policies, state officials have praised his massive infrastructure proposal. Trump promised to repair roads and bridges across the country in his inaugural address and California Gov. Jerry Brown responded last month in his State of the State address: “And I say, ‘Amen to that, man. Amen to that, brother.’” Now that’s a high-speed gravy train. And they'll get it, too, when the courts decide that withholding it is a violation of the equal protection clause.
Chef Jim Posted February 19, 2017 Posted February 19, 2017 And they'll get it, too, when the courts decide that withholding it is a violation of the equal protection clause. Yeah but when we secede we'll be on our own baby. We don't need no stinking federal mon.......oh !@#$!
DC Tom Posted February 19, 2017 Posted February 19, 2017 Yeah but when we secede we'll be on our own baby. We don't need no stinking federal mon.......oh !@#$! Aren't the same people calling for California's secession the ones that claimed even a mention of Texas seceding was sedition?
Azalin Posted February 19, 2017 Posted February 19, 2017 Aren't the same people calling for California's secession the ones that claimed even a mention of Texas seceding was sedition? Yes, but we're mostly gun-totin' rednecks out here, so....
Nanker Posted February 19, 2017 Posted February 19, 2017 Yeah but when we secede we'll be on our own baby. We don't need no stinking federal mon.......oh !@#$! Leave if you must, but the nukes, Navy ships, Air Force planes, the soldiers, sailors, and airmen all belong to us. On the other hand, all those evacuated armed forces bases will make swell neighborhoods for the hundreds of thousands of new Mexicans and Guatemalan Demi-citizens.
Chef Jim Posted February 19, 2017 Posted February 19, 2017 Leave if you must, but the nukes, Navy ships, Air Force planes, the soldiers, sailors, and airmen all belong to us. On the other hand, all those evacuated armed forces bases will make swell neighborhoods for the hundreds of thousands of new Mexicans and Guatemalan Demi-citizens. Why do we need a military? People love California! They really love us!!
Nanker Posted February 19, 2017 Posted February 19, 2017 Why do we need a military? People love California! They really love us!! True. But you'll probably need to get James Taylor to move there and become Secretary of State. He's got the magic touch in international affairs, or so I've heard.
B-Man Posted February 21, 2017 Author Posted February 21, 2017 THIS POLITICIAN MAKES THE MOST SENSE ON ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION I have been waiting a long time for a politician to come along who has exactly the right view of illegal immigration. Finally, I have I guess this was before the Democrats figured out that there was lots of money, and quite a few votes, to be had by being scofflaws. Note that Obama is quite a bit to Trump’s right on immigration. Trump is actually a squish, if you take his pronouncements seriously. He has never talked much about going after employers, which is pretty much the whole ball game. A commenter at InstaPundit has a great idea: President Trump ought to use these exact same words in his next speech and then we can see how the left and the media react.
Prickly Pete Posted February 21, 2017 Posted February 21, 2017 (edited) THIS POLITICIAN MAKES THE MOST SENSE ON ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION I have been waiting a long time for a politician to come along who has exactly the right view of illegal immigration. Finally, I have I guess this was before the Democrats figured out that there was lots of money, and quite a few votes, to be had by being scofflaws. Note that Obama is quite a bit to Trump’s right on immigration. Trump is actually a squish, if you take his pronouncements seriously. He has never talked much about going after employers, which is pretty much the whole ball game. A commenter at InstaPundit has a great idea: President Trump ought to use these exact same words in his next speech and then we can see how the left and the media react. He pretty much did that with Clinton 1996 speech. You can throw this in the Trump haters faces, and they just move on. I pointed it out to my mom, and her response was "well, that just proves how divisive he is. It's the combativeness of the way he presents it. He is tearing the nation apart!" It doesn't matter how many points you make, they are either brainwashed, or so deeply entrenched in their position (because they have publically put their reputation behind attacking Trump) that they can't come back. They are beyond reason. At this point they would have to admit to being completely wrong about some the beliefs that they have built their ego's around. They won't do it, instead it's just fervent denial. I mean, they can't even admit he actually won the election. Maybe they need a hashtag that provides a soft opening for them to express consent... "#IhateTrumpbut...his immigration policy is exactly the same as Bill Clinton's" "#IhateTrumpbut....it seems like he is saving some American jobs" "#IhateTrumpbut....Common Core is kinda kooky" Edited February 21, 2017 by HoF Watkins
Prickly Pete Posted February 21, 2017 Posted February 21, 2017 (edited) "#IhateTrumpbut...he won the election" I looked on Twitter, and there is one guy, one guy in the world, that has used that hashtag, and only once. I don't have a Twitter account (don't want one), so I can't get it rolling, but there needs to be an outlet for the haters to give soft praise. #IhateTrumpbut....I have to admit, Melania is hot. Edited February 21, 2017 by HoF Watkins
B-Man Posted February 22, 2017 Author Posted February 22, 2017 (edited) No real surprise............... Poll: Americans oppose sanctuary cities, support Trump’s immigration agenda A poll released today found that Americans are overwhelmingly against sanctuary cities. From the Hill: A survey from Harvard–Harris Poll provided exclusively to The Hill found that 80 percent of voters say local authorities should have to comply with the law by reporting to federal agents the illegal immigrants they come into contact with… A majority — 52 percent — say they support Trump’s two executive orders allowing for the construction of a southern border wall, increasing the number of immigration officers by 10,000 and finding a way to revoke federal funds for sanctuary cities. The crackdown on sanctuary cities is the most popular feature of those actions, followed closely by the directive to increase the border patrol, which is backed by 75 percent of voters. A Reuters story published last month estimated the nation’s top 10 sanctuary cities could lose $2.3 billion in federal funds if they refuse to cooperate with Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Democratic mayors in Chicago and New York have vowed not to cooperate with any efforts to end sanctuary city policies. However, other parts of the country have voted to end the policies. Miami-Dade county dropped its sanctuary status last week. Overall, this is a very positive poll for Trump. The one exception is the construction of a southern border wall. When this one piece of his agenda is separated from the rest, poll respondents opposed the wall 53-47. Everything else Trump has proposed, including his temporary travel ban on immigration from 7 nations, has majority support. Support for the travel ban went as high as 60% when the question described the 7 countries that are the targets of the ban as “Muslim majority countries.” Edited February 22, 2017 by B-Man
B-Man Posted February 22, 2017 Author Posted February 22, 2017 Remember when Paul Ryan was going to push Granny off a cliff? Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) brings back Dem “Granny” strategy. Dem Senator: “Granny” will be “dragged out of her apartment” under Trump immigration policy
Prickly Pete Posted February 22, 2017 Posted February 22, 2017 Beating women "is the last resort" for a Muslim man... https://twitter.com/theboltreport/status/834327717147324416
Recommended Posts