Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 103
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Ugh. This again.

 

I hate to argue with you because the rule is so stupid, but based on how it's been called every time for the last 3 years, it's an incomplete pass.

 

If you're going to be mad, be mad for calling a pass play leaving 2:01 and a free "timeout" for NE. Then ANOTHER pass.

 

And that pick? So what that his elbow hit the ground? He didn't catch the ball?

Posted

I was wondering how they called that beckham play a "catch" in the first place.

 

Collins dropped the INT too, I don't see how you'd argue otherwise when it was very obvious.

 

I hate the *Patriots so much. Damnit!

Posted

Both were correct calls and neither was close.

 

Beckham got stripped. It was just like the Lee Evans play; he failed to anticipate the defender's action and thus failed to secure the ball. Too bad, cause if he holds on they probably win.

Posted (edited)

Both were correct calls and neither was close.

 

Beckham got stripped. It was just like the Lee Evans play; he failed to anticipate the defender's action and thus failed to secure the ball. Too bad, cause if he holds on they probably win.

 

Both were super obvious, correct calls were made.

 

all the 50/50 calls go there way. Hell, even the 30/70 calls go there way. You can tell they are still cheating

See above. Edited by Ryan L Billz
Posted

all the 50/50 calls go there way. Hell, even the 30/70 calls go there way. You can tell they are still cheating

Of all the games where you could say this, this isn't one of them. A lot of crucial calls went against the Pats.

 

This was a great game. Now we get to be the only team to beat those cheating dbags! Twice :flirt:

Posted (edited)

How was Odell's TD not a !@#$ing TD? He had 2 feet down!

Landon Collins interception not an interception?! His elbow was down!

 

it wasn't a touchdown and it wasn't an interception for the same reason: you have to complete the play, and this happened in neither incident

Edited by CSBill
Posted

For the Pats* apologists, explain to me the hands to the face call near the G-Men goal line--you know, the one that the replay clearly showed was on the Pats* center?

Posted

For the Pats* apologists, explain to me the hands to the face call near the G-Men goal line--you know, the one that the replay clearly showed was on the Pats* center?

Horrible call. The wrong call.

 

It doesn't mean the other two were bad calls as well.

 

Not an apologist, just watched the games without thinking there is some master conspiracy to give the Pats wins. They are just incredibly good.

Posted

I dont think that play was an INT but Beckham's was a TD. He caught the Ball touched the two feet in bounds because he is in the end zone its an instant TD. However the NFL rules are plain stupid. You saw it with the playoffs last year. So whatever illogical BS the refs want to cite from the rule book to explain how a catch isn't a catch doesn't make it not a catch I the real world. Heres another thing, if that was Brady to Gronk and the same things happen. Do you think theres a snowflakes chance in hell they overturn the TD call?? Total BS!!

Posted

Beckham should have pulled the ball into his body instead putting out to show off and get it blasted out of his hands. Makes the td we got last week from Karlos look very questionable.

Posted

Ugh. This again.

 

I hate to argue with you because the rule is so stupid, but based on how it's been called every time for the last 3 years, it's an incomplete pass.

 

If you're going to be mad, be mad for calling a pass play leaving 2:01 and a free "timeout" for NE. Then ANOTHER pass.

 

And that pick? So what that his elbow hit the ground? He didn't catch the ball?

 

^ this. The Giants play calling on their last drive left much to be desired. Giving Marcia and the Pats** two minutes to pull out a victory usually does not end well for their opponent.

×
×
  • Create New...