Deranged Rhino Posted January 19, 2016 Posted January 19, 2016 Politics aside, Straight Outta Compton got ROBBED!
B-Man Posted January 21, 2016 Author Posted January 21, 2016 Monday, everyone suggested that the paltry debate schedule was doing more harm than good for Hillary, whose poll numbers continue to tank: and Lo & behold: Surprise! DNC Adds Last Minute Democratic Presidential Town Hall Event to Calendar CNN GIVES HILLARY ONE LAST CHANCE...
/dev/null Posted January 21, 2016 Posted January 21, 2016 Monday, everyone suggested that the paltry debate schedule was doing more harm than good for Hillary, whose poll numbers continue to tank: and Lo & behold: Surprise! DNC Adds Last Minute Democratic Presidential Town Hall Event to Calendar CNN GIVES HILLARY ONE LAST CHANCE... Next football season should be good for a laugh. Jim Nantz: Roethlesberger in the shotgun Phill Simms: That's right Jim. This next play is going to be a pass. Or it's going to be a run Nantz: And don't forget to tune in after the game to an all new Madam Secretary where the blonde haired female Secretary of State saves the world from stereotypical bad guys from outside the country while being thwarted at every turn by those scheming opposition party members
B-Man Posted January 28, 2016 Author Posted January 28, 2016 In Iowa, liberals' heads are telling them to vote @HillaryClinton, but their hearts are pulling for @SenSanders http://www.nationaljournal.com/s/616787/head-heart-famed-iowa-reporter-out-closet-democrat … Well that's good news for Bernie. Heads vs Hearts........... we know where libs will go
IDBillzFan Posted January 28, 2016 Posted January 28, 2016 Heads vs Hearts........... we know where libs will go Our wallets.
B-Man Posted January 28, 2016 Author Posted January 28, 2016 To Vote in New Hampshire’s Primary, You’ll Need an ID For the first time ever, primary voters will be required to furnish identification before voting in New Hampshire’s primary elections February 9. First implemented in New Hampshire’s 2012 general election cycle, the goal is to crack down on voter fraud. Citing multiple instances of actual voter fraud, New Hampshire authorities defend the new laws. They also claim not one person has been prohibited from voting since the new regulations took effect in 2012. Voters who arrive at the polls without requisite ID can still vote. But first they’ll be required to sign an affidavit attesting to their identity, and a poll worker will snap a photo.
DC Tom Posted January 28, 2016 Posted January 28, 2016 To Vote in New Hampshires Primary, Youll Need an ID For the first time ever, primary voters will be required to furnish identification before voting in New Hampshires primary elections February 9. First implemented in New Hampshires 2012 general election cycle, the goal is to crack down on voter fraud. Citing multiple instances of actual voter fraud, New Hampshire authorities defend the new laws. They also claim not one person has been prohibited from voting since the new regulations took effect in 2012. Voters who arrive at the polls without requisite ID can still vote. But first theyll be required to sign an affidavit attesting to their identity, and a poll worker will snap a photo. But that's not racist, because there's only maybe eight non-whites in NH, hence no one to discriminate against.
B-Man Posted February 3, 2016 Author Posted February 3, 2016 (edited) BREAKING: The DNC and Bernie Sanders confirm agreement on four new Dem debates: http://wapo.st/1StwCzI A DNC spokesman tells us: "The debates will be sanctioned." One in Flint, one in CA, one in PA, and one in NH. LOL...........How predictable with the Flint debate ................I wonder who they'll blame ? Why bother with the debates ? Just decide the democrat nomination with a "coin flip" . Edited February 3, 2016 by B-Man
DC Tom Posted February 3, 2016 Posted February 3, 2016 BREAKING: The DNC and Bernie Sanders confirm agreement on four new Dem debates: http://wapo.st/1StwCzI A DNC spokesman tells us: "The debates will be sanctioned." One in Flint, one in CA, one in PA, and one in NH. LOL...........How predictable with the Flint debate ................I wonder who they'll blame ? Why bother with the debates ? Just decide the democrat nomination with a "coin flip" . In Flint? Flint, Michigan? If that isn't !@#$ing pandering, I don't know what is.
Chef Jim Posted February 3, 2016 Posted February 3, 2016 In Flint? Flint, Michigan? If that isn't !@#$ing pandering, I don't know what is. I'm surprised they aren't holding them in Flint, Ferguson and Baltimore. If you're going pander you might as well go full pander.
B-Man Posted February 4, 2016 Author Posted February 4, 2016 (edited) Four things to watch in first head-to-head Democratic debate http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/four-things-watch-first-head-head-democratic-debate Sanders, Clinton trade blows as New Hampshire battle intensifies The Hill Edited February 4, 2016 by B-Man
IDBillzFan Posted February 4, 2016 Posted February 4, 2016 Four things to watch in first head-to-head Democratic debate http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/four-things-watch-first-head-head-democratic-debate This should be a debate worth watching, especially with O'Malley gone. You can probably expect two hours of softballs from MSNBC, but I'll be curious to see if Bernie changes his tune about her email problem. He won Hillary's favor in the last debate with his 'enough with the emails bit, already,' but I wouldn't be surprised if he changes that tune tonight after realizing what a big mistake that was. So while I'm not one to enjoy a fight between two old, angry white people, this is what comprises the SoProg party now, so we may as well watch. Perhaps Bernie will slip an Ambien in Hillary's pre-debate Geritol cocktail.
keepthefaith Posted February 4, 2016 Posted February 4, 2016 These extra debates have only come about because the Clinton camp must feel she has the advantage over Sanders on stage. Why Bernie has been so cordial to her is anyone's guess. Party orders? He wants to be VP or in the cabinet? Clinton camp has some good dirt on Bernie? He's banging her?
3rdnlng Posted February 4, 2016 Posted February 4, 2016 These extra debates have only come about because the Clinton camp must feel she has the advantage over Sanders on stage. Why Bernie has been so cordial to her is anyone's guess. Party orders? He wants to be VP or in the cabinet? Clinton camp has some good dirt on Bernie? He's banging her? Poor judgment that rivals Hillary's email scandal.
B-Man Posted February 5, 2016 Author Posted February 5, 2016 Democrat slate 2016: Old, white Commies GOP slate 2016: Young and multi-ethnic.
Cugalabanza Posted February 5, 2016 Posted February 5, 2016 I thought that was a very good debate last night. It was refreshing to see a relatively intelligent discussion of the topics. I think the candidates effectively laid out their positions. No personal attacks. They did not dodge any questions. The moderators did a nice job. One of the best debates I've ever watched in terms of actually helping to inform the viewers. Also, I think both candidates improved their campaigns. I agree with what one of the analysts said afterwards: Clinton most likely will close the gap in the upcoming New Hampshire primary and Sanders probably will close the gap nationally.
IDBillzFan Posted February 5, 2016 Posted February 5, 2016 I read an unintentionally funny comment online last night about how the candidates were discussing the things that are important to Americans, like climate change. Meanwhile, here's an interesting article on why millennials think Bernie is a dreamboat. The first is that, to millennials, Sanders’s socialism is a feature, not a bug. Much of the current conversation about Sanders’s “democratic socialism” is predicated on whether Americans can look past this supposedly toxic label. But millennials love Sanders not despite his socialism, but because of it. “Socialism” has never been a dirty word for the current cohort of youth, who either didn’t live through the Cold War or don’t remember it. We are more likely to associate socialism with prosperous, egalitarian, relatively well-functioning Scandinavian states — the kinds of places that produce awesome things like Ikea and “The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo” — than with autocrats who starve their people. Many of us also entered the job market just as unbridled capitalism appeared to blow up the world economy. Perhaps for this reason, millennials actually seem to prefer socialism to capitalism.
keepthefaith Posted February 5, 2016 Posted February 5, 2016 I thought that was a very good debate last night. It was refreshing to see a relatively intelligent discussion of the topics. I think the candidates effectively laid out their positions. No personal attacks. They did not dodge any questions. The moderators did a nice job. One of the best debates I've ever watched in terms of actually helping to inform the viewers. Also, I think both candidates improved their campaigns. I agree with what one of the analysts said afterwards: Clinton most likely will close the gap in the upcoming New Hampshire primary and Sanders probably will close the gap nationally. It was civil yes. However like each of their other debates, they barely even address the big federal issues with any substance. Debt, budgets, entitlements, economic growth policies, national security and immigration get little air time and what little is offered is bad policy. That and Sanders bites his tongue on Hillary's abysmal record while Hillary continues to deceive.
B-Man Posted February 5, 2016 Author Posted February 5, 2016 Poll: Sanders nearly tied with Clinton nationwide http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/268362-sanders-tied-with-clinton-nationwide-poll MONEY, MONEY, MONEY, MONEY! NYT Moderator Hugs Candidates........... Clinton spending more on polling than six Republican candidates COMBINED...
Recommended Posts