GunnerBill Posted November 15, 2015 Posted November 15, 2015 There is a chance as a two somewhere in EJs future.... look around the league.... Clausen is a #2, Weeden started the year as a #2 and Gabbert is a #2 who is currently starting. There are some terrible back up situations out there.
BillsFan-4-Ever Posted November 15, 2015 Posted November 15, 2015 There is a chance as a two somewhere in EJs future.... look around the league.... Clausen is a #2, Weeden started the year as a #2 and Gabbert is a #2 who is currently starting. There are some terrible back up situations out there. TRUTH
BillsFan-4-Ever Posted November 15, 2015 Posted November 15, 2015 (edited) Yes you're right Ej is horrible But seriously , do you know much about Qb measurement ? Looking at yards and completion percentage on their own doesn't say much about how well a Qb actually played. That's why people like to look at qb rating as well as yards per attempt. For the Cincy game, EJ had 6.26 yards per attempt and an 81.7 rating. Any ypa below 7 yards is pretty darn mediocre. Similarly an 81.7 rating is average to below average. In contrast, Dalton had 7.36 yards per attempt and a 118.6 rating . 7.36 is decent to very good for ypa while 118.6 qb rating is outstanding. So can you tell me again that Ej outplayed Dalton? to my understanding from what I read about ESPN's "magic number generator" some factors are not included that skew the numbers. After my clarification' please do don't twist my words - I said EJ had 13 more passing yards than Dalton, same completion ratio (I will also add) and held the ball with TOP 30-30 and had 1.1 less yards per play difference in passing. My god how could I not see that whole yard as being superior. A backup QB played as close to a Franchise QB as one could expect. Lets ignore the positive and criticize him endlessly. Edited November 15, 2015 by BillsFan-4-Ever
Big Gun Posted November 15, 2015 Posted November 15, 2015 to my understanding from what I read about ESPN's "magic number generator" some factors are not included that skew the numbers. After my clarification' please do don't twist my words - I said EJ had 13 more passing yards than Dalton, same completion ratio (I will also add) and held the ball with TOP 30-30 and had 1.1 less yards per play difference in passing. My god how could I not see that whole yard as being superior. A backup QB played as close to a Franchise QB as one could expect. Lets ignore the positive and criticize him endlessly. You emphasize 1.1 ypp less as no biggie yet keep hanging your hat on 13 yards more than Dalton. Really! OMG it really is hopeless talking to EJs crew. What's the point anymore!
prissythecat Posted November 15, 2015 Posted November 15, 2015 to my understanding from what I read about ESPN's "magic number generator" some factors are not included that skew the numbers. After my clarification' please do don't twist my words - I said EJ had 13 more passing yards than Dalton, same completion ratio (I will also add) and held the ball with TOP 30-30 and had 1.1 less yards per play difference in passing. My god how could I not see that whole yard as being superior. A backup QB played as close to a Franchise QB as one could expect. Lets ignore the positive and criticize him endlessly. I wasn't using ESPN QBR... So not sure what makes you thing that. Also, a difference in 1.1 ypa especially when one guy is below 7 ypa is huge. It means that one guy wasn't doing a good enough job of moving the chains while the other one was.
LA Grant Posted November 15, 2015 Posted November 15, 2015 EJ can be a #2 on a team that didn't spend a 1st Round Pick for him to be a franchise QB. There's too much baggage on him here.
BillsFan-4-Ever Posted November 16, 2015 Posted November 16, 2015 (edited) You emphasize 1.1 ypp less as no biggie yet keep hanging your hat on 13 yards more than Dalton. Really! OMG it really is hopeless talking to EJs crew. What's the point anymore! Exactly what is your point in trashing a backup? Edited November 16, 2015 by BillsFan-4-Ever
FireChan Posted November 16, 2015 Posted November 16, 2015 Didn't Cassel's wife give birth to their latest child on Oct 18? The week Buffalo shuffled off to London for the week? Sorry to offend but MC is MEH. 4 straight losses helps prove that Exactly what is your point in trashing a backup? Why don't you tell us?
Boatdrinks Posted November 16, 2015 Posted November 16, 2015 EJ can be a #2 on a team that didn't spend a 1st Round Pick for him to be a franchise QB. There's too much baggage on him here. It's not about " baggage" . Rather, it's about cost. EJ's 1st round status makes his 5 th year option a pretty heavy lift. Far too much for a backup QB ( around 12 mil I believe). So the choice will be do the Bills retain him for only the 4th year at a reasonable cost, or do they try to trade him in the offseason and find a different backup that they plan on keeping awhile? It's really a $ decision more than anything else.
BuffaloHokie13 Posted November 16, 2015 Posted November 16, 2015 (edited) I am truly sorry... the #'s listed in your post (above 100) looked like ESPN QBR #'s ESPN tQBR doesn't go above 100, ever. It's a 0-100 rating scale. Edited November 16, 2015 by BuffaloHokie13
BillsFan-4-Ever Posted November 16, 2015 Posted November 16, 2015 ESPN tQBR doesn't go above 100, ever. It's a 0-100 rating scale. Yes, I see my mistake now.
Recommended Posts