Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, 3rdnlng said:

I had originally signed up here using an old job email account. When I no longer had that account I couldn't sign in for some reason. Just think, if bans are undone we could get duckdog back. Have a good day. :rolleyes:

I'm fairly certain he is back. 

And I miss Ryan L Billz. 

Posted
3 hours ago, DC Tom said:

What are you, a !@#$ing Clinton?

I could handle it when you called me a moron. I could even handle it when you called me an idiot. This time, you've gone too far, you steaming pile of gatorschit.

Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, \GoBillsInDallas/ said:

 

It's ok though, he was forced to give a fake apology and slightly tweak the article.

Edited by Koko78
Posted

Lunatics....................

 

http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2017/11/tut-tutting-the-twits.php?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+powerlineblog%2Flivefeed+(Power+Line)

 

I didn’t think it was necessary to keep up with the self-destruction of Reed College, where the left doesn’t know how to deal with the far left. (I doubt there is a single faculty member or student at Reed much to the right of Bernie Sanders, so the fact that Reed is tearing itself apart over the usual identity politics flashpoints is just a special bonus for popcorn sales.)

 

But the latest update on Reed from The Atlantic leads off with something simply beyond the pale:

Quote

 

At Reed College, a small liberal-arts school in Portland, Oregon, a 39-year-old Saturday Night Live skit recently caused an uproar over cultural appropriation. In the classic Steve Martin skit, he performs a goofy song, “King Tut,” meant to satirize a Tutankhamun exhibit touring the U.S. and to criticize the commercialization of Egyptian culture. You could say that his critique is weak; that his humor is lame; that his dance moves are unintentionally offensive or downright racist. All of that, and more, was debated in a humanities course at Reed.

 

But many students found the video so egregious that they opposed its very presence in class. “That’s like somebody … making a song just littered with the n-word everywhere,” a member of Reedies Against Racism (RAR) told the student newspaper when asked about Martin’s performance. She told me more: The Egyptian garb of the backup dancers and singers—many of whom are African American—“is racist as well. The gold face of the saxophone dancer leaving its tomb is an exhibition of blackface.”

 

 

One irony here is that I recall seeing Steve Martin once explain that he deliberately crafted his zany style of humor, emphasizing his gifts at physical comedy, in order to get away from the over-politicized style of stand-up comedy that had grown up in the 1960s. But now even this is suspect for the hair-trigger left. (By the way, how long until the use of the word “triggering” will be banned, because it reminds us of guns, which are evil and should only be allowed to be carried by police. Oh, wait. . .)

 

More at the link.

Posted
48 minutes ago, row_33 said:

 

I would have it cancelled because he was an endlessly ranting bore his last few years.

 

 

You have to imagine Lenny is laughing his ass off over the cancellation wherever he is these days. It just validates the themes of most of his material.

Posted (edited)

Is the National Anthem Racist?

 

There are several possible answers to this question:

1) Of course, because everything is racist.

2) It’s anyone’s guess. The word “racist” has no meaning.

3) Don’t be stupid.

 

“Yes” isn’t really on the list. Yet the California chapter of the NAACP is trying to get rid of the National Anthem:

Quote

 

The California NAACP is pushing to get rid of the national anthem that they’re calling racist and anti-black.

“This song is wrong; it shouldn’t have been there, we didn’t have it ’til 1931, so it won’t kill us if it goes away,” said the organization’s president Alice Huffman.

 

 

You probably have heard something about this faux controversy. It relates to the third stanza of the Anthem, which hardly anyone has ever heard sung. Only recently have activists dredged up that long-forgotten stanza to make political hay out of it. It says:

 

No refuge could save the hireling and slave
From the terror of flight or the gloom of the grave,
And the star-spangled banner in triumph doth wave
O’er the land of the free and the home of the brave.

NAACP leader Alice Huffman says “…some interpretations conclude that the lyrics celebrate the deaths of black American slaves fighting for freedom.” If so, those interpretations are silly. The song celebrates the fact that “hireling and slave” who fought for the British lost the battle of Fort McHenry. The verse is no more anti-slave (let alone anti-Black) than it is anti-hireling. Francis Scott Key wasn’t expressing an opinion on mercenary armies or slavery, he was celebrating his country’s victory over those who fought for the British–whoever they may be–in the battle.

 

More at the link:

Edited by B-Man
Posted

well, this isn't Yale or Mizzou. i didn't know where to put it but it belongs somewhere here.

 

from the truth is stranger than fiction dept: you just can make this **** up.

 

try to peel away the slant

Harvard Hosts Anal Sex Workshop Entitled ‘What What in the Butt’

 

...

As with most proceedings at Harvard, the anal sex workshop placed great emphasis on equality. After the presenter noted that “not all men have penises, not all women have vaginas,” she argued that “the butthole is the great sexual equalizer. All humans have a butthole.”...

×
×
  • Create New...