DC Tom Posted October 18, 2019 Posted October 18, 2019 On 10/15/2019 at 5:47 PM, B-Man said: So apparently this is a thing....................... ............Until people "conform"....... It's not a thing. It's one idiot trying to make it a thing.
4merper4mer Posted October 18, 2019 Posted October 18, 2019 18 minutes ago, DC Tom said: It's not a thing. It's one idiot trying to make it a thing. Dead Angle is one of the crappiest TV shows ever made but the tattoo chick looks hot sometimes
DC Tom Posted October 18, 2019 Posted October 18, 2019 7 minutes ago, 4merper4mer said: Dead Angle is one of the crappiest TV shows ever made but the tattoo chick looks hot sometimes This post is also not a thing, but one idiot trying to make it a thing.
B-Man Posted October 22, 2019 Posted October 22, 2019 ‘You know the drill’: The Independent tries to stir up outrage over Chris Pratt joking about his wife’s cooking, comes up pathetically short https://twitchy.com/sarahd-313035/2019/10/22/you-know-the-drill-the-independent-tries-to-stir-up-outrage-over-chris-pratt-joking-about-his-wifes-cooking-comes-up-pathetically-short/ 1
Buffalo_Gal Posted October 22, 2019 Posted October 22, 2019 On 8/11/2019 at 1:26 PM, B-Man said: “Bubby then asked what exactly it means to be ‘made to care’ and what that looks like.” by Bethany Mandel The other day at the playground I had one of the more uncomfortable conversations in recent memory. I was talking with a conservative-leaning mom friend and her liberal 83-year old grandmother (“Bubby”) about the “transgender movement.” Bubby had a simple question for me, and one I get a lot when I express dismay about the movement: “Why do you care what someone else calls you?” My answer, to quote Erick Erickson, “We will be made to care.” It’s not enough to live and let live; those in the social justice Left want to force you to accept and embrace whatever is on their agenda, which has shifted from gay marriage (which I was a long-time supporter of) to the idea that we can decide to be whatever gender we feel, with no connection to our DNA, biology, anatomy, etc. Bubby asked me how it differed from gay marriage, in that we just should accept people for whatever they are. But being gay or lesbian isn’t about who or what you are; it’s about who you are sexually attracted to; it’s entirely based on feelings. But gender isn’t a social construct, no matter how much we’re told it is. Our genetics, our bone structure, our brains, our biology determine if we are a man or if we are a woman. Bubby then asked what exactly it means to be “made to care” and what that looks like. And hence, the uncomfortable conversation. Her granddaughter mentioned “Jessica Yaniv” a transgender activist in Canada targeting immigrant beauticians and charging discrimination when they won’t offer their services. Yaniv asked for genital waxing, and even though Yaniv claims to be a woman, biology says otherwise. Yaniv has a case for discrimination, and it could mean that women in the beauty industry who are only comfortable doing a bikini wax on a woman could be forced to handle the genitalia of biological men alone in treatment rooms. What could go wrong? Follow-up:BC Human Rights Tribunal rules in favour of female estheticians who refused to wax male genitalia The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms (JCCF.ca) is pleased to announce that the BC Human Rights Tribunal has ruled in favour of home estheticians’ right to refuse to handle male genitalia against their will. The decision noted, “human rights legislation does not require a service provider to wax a type of genitals they are not trained for and have not consented to wax.” The decision further found that the complainant Jessica Yaniv “engaged in improper conduct”, “filed complaints for improper purposes”, and concluded Yaniv’s testimony was “disingenuous and self-serving.” Finally, noted the Tribunal, Yaniv was “evasive and argumentative and contradicted herself” while giving evidence. </snip> 2
3rdnlng Posted October 22, 2019 Posted October 22, 2019 31 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: Follow-up:BC Human Rights Tribunal rules in favour of female estheticians who refused to wax male genitalia The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms (JCCF.ca) is pleased to announce that the BC Human Rights Tribunal has ruled in favour of home estheticians’ right to refuse to handle male genitalia against their will. The decision noted, “human rights legislation does not require a service provider to wax a type of genitals they are not trained for and have not consented to wax.” The decision further found that the complainant Jessica Yaniv “engaged in improper conduct”, “filed complaints for improper purposes”, and concluded Yaniv’s testimony was “disingenuous and self-serving.” Finally, noted the Tribunal, Yaniv was “evasive and argumentative and contradicted herself” while giving evidence. </snip> That would be like complaining to the mercurial chef about your dinner tasting likeshit. It might come back from the kitchen with good reason for it tasting like that. I've never been waxed (intentionally) but I would assume that the esthetician could cause some pretty severe pain if she really didn't want to be waxing male genitalia.
B-Man Posted October 23, 2019 Posted October 23, 2019 UConn students ARRESTED for ‘ridiculing’ speech in viral video. That’s ridiculous. .
B-Man Posted October 23, 2019 Posted October 23, 2019 Fliers single out Asian-American conservative activist at University of Michigan as ‘white supremacist’. . 1
TakeYouToTasker Posted October 23, 2019 Posted October 23, 2019 The death of the West will be ruled a suicide. https://reason.com/2019/10/22/seattle-math-oppressive-cultural-woke/ 2 4
RoyBatty is alive Posted October 23, 2019 Posted October 23, 2019 1 hour ago, B-Man said: UConn students ARRESTED for ‘ridiculing’ speech in viral video. That’s ridiculous. . downright scary, how in the heck is this constitutional?
B-Man Posted October 23, 2019 Posted October 23, 2019 THE BALLS BACK IN HIS COURT: Trans Provocateur Loses Legal Battle to Force Women to Wax His Genitals. Related: “Jessica” Yaniv loses lawsuits against female estheticians who refused to wax his genitals. New video from Canada’s Rebel TV. .
GG Posted October 23, 2019 Posted October 23, 2019 55 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said: The death of the West will be ruled a suicide. https://reason.com/2019/10/22/seattle-math-oppressive-cultural-woke/ And then you wonder why inner city kids have trouble in college physics courses? Does anyone look at Step 2 of any proposed rule? 1
row_33 Posted October 23, 2019 Posted October 23, 2019 (edited) 7 minutes ago, GG said: And then you wonder why inner city kids have trouble in college physics courses? Does anyone look at Step 2 of any proposed rule? the divide between male and female students on college physics is staggering enough after 60 years of trying to make it equal Edited October 23, 2019 by row_33
Foxx Posted October 23, 2019 Posted October 23, 2019 now i gotta go change my drawers, i ***** peed my pants i was laughing so hard. https://twitter.com/badluck_jones/status/1186881451473682432 2
Chef Jim Posted October 23, 2019 Posted October 23, 2019 5 hours ago, Hedge said: Well ain't that a B word! 1
Chef Jim Posted October 24, 2019 Posted October 24, 2019 21 minutes ago, Chef Jim said: Well ain't that a B word! It's happening already!! ? 1
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted October 24, 2019 Posted October 24, 2019 43 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: It’s become so painful for me to watch this sort of charade play out. This piece of trash dressed up as a member of Congress makes up a narrative for political gain, is corrected immediately yet she pushes forward even though she ended up looking like a girl who got called out in chemistry class for insisting that the atomic number of Moscovium is 5! More importantly, she’s so proud of her performance she includes it on her house account. 2
B-Man Posted October 24, 2019 Posted October 24, 2019 THIS IS NOT YOUR FATHER’S ACLU: UConn students arrested for engaging in offensive speech. The ACLU of Connecticut puts out a press release denouncing racism at U Conn, apparently endorsing new hate speech rules, and opining that “policing is an inherently white supremacist institution.” Only at the very end of the release do we get a statement from the national ACLU that the speech in question is constitutionally protected. .
Recommended Posts