Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 9/17/2018 at 3:26 AM, #34fan said:

 

One of the few topics which you and I are in total agreement .

 

There's no way an eight year old boy or girl can fathom the consequences of permanent mutilation.  It should be forbidden before age 18.

 

 

I am deathly afraid the medical community will be performing surgeries to make kids look emo when they go through that phase too.

Posted
7 hours ago, 3rdnlng said:

Have you pm'd Tom & Boyst about this yet?

Tom already has it arriving tonight for me. I am making him dinner in this. He asked me to re-upy Netflix subscription, so I guess we will be watching a movie afterwards

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Mike Nayna

@MikeNayna

For over a year now I’ve been documenting

@peterboghossian

 

@HPluckrose

and

@ConceptualJames

as they secretly submit bat-**** insane papers to peer-reviewed journals. Seven have been accepted and more are still on track for publication. FULL VIDEO: (link: https://youtu.be/kVk9a5Jcd1k) youtu.be/kVk9a5Jcd1k

0:58

62.7K views

8:07 PM · Oct 2, 2018

Posted
52 minutes ago, LBSeeBallLBGetBall said:

Mike Nayna

@MikeNayna

For over a year now I’ve been documenting

@peterboghossian

 

@HPluckrose

and

@ConceptualJames

as they secretly submit bat-**** insane papers to peer-reviewed journals. Seven have been accepted and more are still on track for publication. FULL VIDEO: (link: https://youtu.be/kVk9a5Jcd1k) youtu.be/kVk9a5Jcd1k

0:58

62.7K views

8:07 PM · Oct 2, 2018

 

Peer review isn't intended to validate results, only methodology.  You can write the most batshit thong imaginable, and if you're methodology is sound it should pass review. 

 

Again: I recently read a published paper on the dietary requirements of the Loch Ness monster.

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

Peer review isn't intended to validate results, only methodology.  You can write the most batshit thong imaginable, and if you're methodology is sound it should pass review. 

 

Again: I recently read a published paper on the dietary requirements of the Loch Ness monster.

 

I'd love to see the dissertation by Sisqo.

Posted
10 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

Peer review isn't intended to validate results, only methodology.  You can write the most batshit thong imaginable, and if you're methodology is sound it should pass review. 

 

Again: I recently read a published paper on the dietary requirements of the Loch Ness monster.

 

Now you're reviewing thongs? How far you've slipped.0:)

Posted
10 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

Peer review isn't intended to validate results, only methodology.  You can write the most batshit thong imaginable, and if you're methodology is sound it should pass review. 

 

Again: I recently read a published paper on the dietary requirements of the Loch Ness monster.

 

Thanks for clarifying.

Posted
39 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

Just my wife's.  :w00t:

My Sisqo reference was much better.  But you're a nerd and didn't get it

 

 In the 90s you had your Tom petty, Nirvana, and other **** tier music

 

 

You weren't cool

Posted

WHY ARE FEMINISTS MINIMIZING THE SIGNIFICANCE OF RAPE ?

 

Seen on Facebook: “I’m amazed at the progressives who argue that Kavanaugh should not have expressed anger that he has been accused of being a rapist, and that he shouldn’t have lashed out at such accusations even if they are entirely false.

 

If being accused of being a rapist isn’t a big deal, then rape isn’t a big deal.”

 

.

 
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
Posted

More silliness from the NY Daily News.....................

 

 

 

click here to read article

 

Ron Darling uses slur in reference to Masahiro Tanaka on TBS broadcast of Yankees/Red Sox Game 2

 

Never mind that "Chink" is a slur for someone of Chinese ethnicity and that Tanaka is Japanese.

 

Never mind that the announcer (Ron Darling) himself is of half Chinese-Hawaiian ancestry.

 

Never mind that "chink in the armor" is common phrase that has nothing to do with ethnicity.

 

He must be burned at the liberal PC stake. 

 

 

 

Talk about a slanted article......:flirt:

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
On 11/11/2015 at 2:51 PM, B-Man said:

After Yale, Mizzou, raise the voting age — to 25.

 

 

 

Christakis–the liberal Yale Professor who dared to question P.C. orthodoxy–has profusely apologized to the “offended” snowflakes who are now running the progressive asylums universities:

 

 

 

 

 

REAPING WHAT PROGRESSIVISM HATH SOWN:

 

Kevin Williamson on “Yale’s Idiot Children“:

 

 

 

On Friday, I was honored to be a guest of the William F. Buckley Jr. Program at Yale, where I participated in a panel on freedom of speech with the wonderful writer Harry Stein and Professor Bradley A. Smith, a noted law scholar.

 

 

 

The Yale kids did their screaming best to prevent us from having a conversation about free speech — the Yale kids are utterly immune to irony — but the event went much as planned. Coming and going, we were chanted at by idiot children screaming, “Genocide is not a joke!” . . .

 

 

 

If you’re wondering about the genocide thing, so were we. . . . The idiot children were screaming about Lukianoff because he said they were overreacting to Christakis’s criticism that they tend to scream and overreact. Well played, idiot children.

 

 

 

Of course, these idiot children aren’t children. These are young adults who can serve in the military, get married, buy firearms, drink alcohol, etc. They are at the beginning years of adult life, but they are entirely unprepared for adult life. . . .

 

 

 

As for me, I think that they’re clowns, and worse than that, really: They’re bad citizens, and defective people from defective families.
They aren’t motivated by good will, but by fear: of the dawning realization that they, as people, aren’t really all that important, despite having been told all their lives how important they are.

 

 

 

We’re all real sorry about your safe spaces and your pacifier and your stuffed puppy, Caitlyn. Really we are. Yet the perpetual revolution of configured stars continues in its indifference, and the lot of man is ceaseless labor, and though you may find the thought terrifying — and thinking itself terrifying — it may turn out to be the case that the screaming in the dark you do on campus is more or less the same screaming in the dark you did in the crib, the same howl for the same reason.

 

 

 

30 unless you are a member of the military.

×
×
  • Create New...