Jump to content

The Mizzou/Yale/PC/Free Speech Topic


FireChan

Recommended Posts

On 9/17/2018 at 3:26 AM, #34fan said:

 

One of the few topics which you and I are in total agreement .

 

There's no way an eight year old boy or girl can fathom the consequences of permanent mutilation.  It should be forbidden before age 18.

 

 

I am deathly afraid the medical community will be performing surgeries to make kids look emo when they go through that phase too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, B-Man said:

Inevitable: You can now order your “Slutty Handmaid” costume in time for Halloween

https://twitchy.com/brettt-3136/2018/09/20/inevitable-you-can-now-order-your-slutty-handmaid-costume-in-time-for-halloween/

 

Dnj8izvVYAAGb8w.jpg.........................:w00t:

 

 

Even when the patriarchy loses it wins

 

 

 

.

Have you pm'd Tom & Boyst about this yet?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Mike Nayna

@MikeNayna

For over a year now I’ve been documenting

@peterboghossian

 

@HPluckrose

and

@ConceptualJames

as they secretly submit bat-**** insane papers to peer-reviewed journals. Seven have been accepted and more are still on track for publication. FULL VIDEO: (link: https://youtu.be/kVk9a5Jcd1k) youtu.be/kVk9a5Jcd1k

0:58

62.7K views

8:07 PM · Oct 2, 2018

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, LBSeeBallLBGetBall said:

Mike Nayna

@MikeNayna

For over a year now I’ve been documenting

@peterboghossian

 

@HPluckrose

and

@ConceptualJames

as they secretly submit bat-**** insane papers to peer-reviewed journals. Seven have been accepted and more are still on track for publication. FULL VIDEO: (link: https://youtu.be/kVk9a5Jcd1k) youtu.be/kVk9a5Jcd1k

0:58

62.7K views

8:07 PM · Oct 2, 2018

 

Peer review isn't intended to validate results, only methodology.  You can write the most batshit thong imaginable, and if you're methodology is sound it should pass review. 

 

Again: I recently read a published paper on the dietary requirements of the Loch Ness monster.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

Peer review isn't intended to validate results, only methodology.  You can write the most batshit thong imaginable, and if you're methodology is sound it should pass review. 

 

Again: I recently read a published paper on the dietary requirements of the Loch Ness monster.

 

I'd love to see the dissertation by Sisqo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

Peer review isn't intended to validate results, only methodology.  You can write the most batshit thong imaginable, and if you're methodology is sound it should pass review. 

 

Again: I recently read a published paper on the dietary requirements of the Loch Ness monster.

 

Now you're reviewing thongs? How far you've slipped.0:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

Peer review isn't intended to validate results, only methodology.  You can write the most batshit thong imaginable, and if you're methodology is sound it should pass review. 

 

Again: I recently read a published paper on the dietary requirements of the Loch Ness monster.

 

Thanks for clarifying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

Just my wife's.  :w00t:

My Sisqo reference was much better.  But you're a nerd and didn't get it

 

 In the 90s you had your Tom petty, Nirvana, and other **** tier music

 

 

You weren't cool

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WHY ARE FEMINISTS MINIMIZING THE SIGNIFICANCE OF RAPE ?

 

Seen on Facebook: “I’m amazed at the progressives who argue that Kavanaugh should not have expressed anger that he has been accused of being a rapist, and that he shouldn’t have lashed out at such accusations even if they are entirely false.

 

If being accused of being a rapist isn’t a big deal, then rape isn’t a big deal.”

 

.

 
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

More silliness from the NY Daily News.....................

 

 

 

click here to read article

 

Ron Darling uses slur in reference to Masahiro Tanaka on TBS broadcast of Yankees/Red Sox Game 2

 

Never mind that "Chink" is a slur for someone of Chinese ethnicity and that Tanaka is Japanese.

 

Never mind that the announcer (Ron Darling) himself is of half Chinese-Hawaiian ancestry.

 

Never mind that "chink in the armor" is common phrase that has nothing to do with ethnicity.

 

He must be burned at the liberal PC stake. 

 

 

 

Talk about a slanted article......:flirt:

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/11/2015 at 2:51 PM, B-Man said:

After Yale, Mizzou, raise the voting age — to 25.

 

 

 

Christakis–the liberal Yale Professor who dared to question P.C. orthodoxy–has profusely apologized to the “offended” snowflakes who are now running the progressive asylums universities:

 

 

 

 

 

REAPING WHAT PROGRESSIVISM HATH SOWN:

 

Kevin Williamson on “Yale’s Idiot Children“:

 

 

 

On Friday, I was honored to be a guest of the William F. Buckley Jr. Program at Yale, where I participated in a panel on freedom of speech with the wonderful writer Harry Stein and Professor Bradley A. Smith, a noted law scholar.

 

 

 

The Yale kids did their screaming best to prevent us from having a conversation about free speech — the Yale kids are utterly immune to irony — but the event went much as planned. Coming and going, we were chanted at by idiot children screaming, “Genocide is not a joke!” . . .

 

 

 

If you’re wondering about the genocide thing, so were we. . . . The idiot children were screaming about Lukianoff because he said they were overreacting to Christakis’s criticism that they tend to scream and overreact. Well played, idiot children.

 

 

 

Of course, these idiot children aren’t children. These are young adults who can serve in the military, get married, buy firearms, drink alcohol, etc. They are at the beginning years of adult life, but they are entirely unprepared for adult life. . . .

 

 

 

As for me, I think that they’re clowns, and worse than that, really: They’re bad citizens, and defective people from defective families.
They aren’t motivated by good will, but by fear: of the dawning realization that they, as people, aren’t really all that important, despite having been told all their lives how important they are.

 

 

 

We’re all real sorry about your safe spaces and your pacifier and your stuffed puppy, Caitlyn. Really we are. Yet the perpetual revolution of configured stars continues in its indifference, and the lot of man is ceaseless labor, and though you may find the thought terrifying — and thinking itself terrifying — it may turn out to be the case that the screaming in the dark you do on campus is more or less the same screaming in the dark you did in the crib, the same howl for the same reason.

 

 

 

30 unless you are a member of the military.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...