GG Posted August 16, 2018 Posted August 16, 2018 17 hours ago, LABillzFan said: The problem is that as a staged, targeted hit on a small business owner, it promotes the hypocrisy of the left with little accountability. The left is trying to make a point. The challenge is that the point they SAY they're making and the point they really ARE making are two different things. They SAY they're dealing with a bigot because he refuses to do everything the left wants him to do for a homosexual. This baker, in fact, creates product for many gays. He chooses not to partake in the ceremony, and the left simply finds that unacceptable. But again, understanding this is all staged, ask yourself: why does the left go after the Christian baker, but not the Muslim baker? Why is it always a Christian baker in these staged events? Too bad John Adams Franklin Quaker abandoned these shores and can't defend his theory that these issues won't snowball. 1
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted August 16, 2018 Posted August 16, 2018 1 minute ago, GG said: Too bad John Adams Franklin Quaker abandoned these shores and can't defend his theory that these issues won't snowball. What happened to ol' Ben I wonder?
3rdnlng Posted August 16, 2018 Posted August 16, 2018 7 minutes ago, joesixpack said: What happened to ol' Ben I wonder? I think he's still here but under a name that wouldn't give him away.
B-Man Posted August 16, 2018 Posted August 16, 2018 Anti-Discrimination Laws Are Wielded against a Shelter for Battered Women https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/08/anti-discrimination-laws-used-against-battered-women-shelter/ There is a concept in Judaism that unnecessary stringency, even in the pursuit of positive goals, can have negative effects. This is similar to the idea of unintended consequences. A recent incident involving a women’s shelter in Anchorage, Alaska, illustrates how, taken to an overzealous extreme, even a sincere attempt to protect the dignity of some can cause tremendous suffering to others. In that case and others, self-righteous bureaucrats have distorted anti-discrimination laws to persecute religious and traditional Americans. On the night of January 28, 2018, an employee answered a knock on the door of the Downtown Hope Center, a women’s shelter that provides a safe place for battered women and those who have escaped sex-trafficking. She expected to find another woman in need of a safe place to sleep. Instead, she found a biological male in a nightgown. He was drunk and appeared wounded. The biological man, Timothy Coyle, who identified as a transgender woman, Samantha Coyle, had gotten into a fight and been ejected from a nearby homeless shelter. Sherrie Laurie, the director of the Hope Center, told Coyle that he could not stay there, but she provided him with cab fare and sent him to the emergency room for treatment. Coyle returned the next day, and the Center again informed him that it could not admit him for a number of reasons, including his arrival before the shelter opened for new admissions that day. Coyle responded by filing a complaint with the Anchorage Equal Rights Commission, under a statute prohibiting discrimination in public accommodations. Yes, you read that right: A man sued a women’s shelter, claiming that it was legally required to allow him to sleep among the women it housed. This case highlights the way in which zealotry can go awry. The attempt to defend one group, transgendered individuals, is undermining attempts to protect the safety and dignity of a second group — vulnerable women. more at the link: .
row_33 Posted August 16, 2018 Posted August 16, 2018 3 hours ago, 3rdnlng said: I think he's still here but under a name that wouldn't give him away. we can spot a mult a mile away
3rdnlng Posted August 16, 2018 Posted August 16, 2018 1 minute ago, row_33 said: we can spot a mult a mile away I can't remember who it was but I distinctly thought at the time that he reminded me of JA/BF.
row_33 Posted August 16, 2018 Posted August 16, 2018 9 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: I can't remember who it was but I distinctly thought at the time that he reminded me of JA/BF. i wish peace on earth and goodwill among all posters, i don't judge...
DC Tom Posted August 16, 2018 Posted August 16, 2018 29 minutes ago, B-Man said: Anti-Discrimination Laws Are Wielded against a Shelter for Battered Women https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/08/anti-discrimination-laws-used-against-battered-women-shelter/ There is a concept in Judaism that unnecessary stringency, even in the pursuit of positive goals, can have negative effects. This is similar to the idea of unintended consequences. A recent incident involving a women’s shelter in Anchorage, Alaska, illustrates how, taken to an overzealous extreme, even a sincere attempt to protect the dignity of some can cause tremendous suffering to others. In that case and others, self-righteous bureaucrats have distorted anti-discrimination laws to persecute religious and traditional Americans. On the night of January 28, 2018, an employee answered a knock on the door of the Downtown Hope Center, a women’s shelter that provides a safe place for battered women and those who have escaped sex-trafficking. She expected to find another woman in need of a safe place to sleep. Instead, she found a biological male in a nightgown. He was drunk and appeared wounded. The biological man, Timothy Coyle, who identified as a transgender woman, Samantha Coyle, had gotten into a fight and been ejected from a nearby homeless shelter. Sherrie Laurie, the director of the Hope Center, told Coyle that he could not stay there, but she provided him with cab fare and sent him to the emergency room for treatment. Coyle returned the next day, and the Center again informed him that it could not admit him for a number of reasons, including his arrival before the shelter opened for new admissions that day. Coyle responded by filing a complaint with the Anchorage Equal Rights Commission, under a statute prohibiting discrimination in public accommodations. Yes, you read that right: A man sued a women’s shelter, claiming that it was legally required to allow him to sleep among the women it housed. This case highlights the way in which zealotry can go awry. The attempt to defend one group, transgendered individuals, is undermining attempts to protect the safety and dignity of a second group — vulnerable women. more at the link: . No, a trans-woman sued a woman's shelter. The question then being...can a cis-woman's shelter discriminate against trans-women?
row_33 Posted August 16, 2018 Posted August 16, 2018 32 minutes ago, DC Tom said: No, a trans-woman sued a woman's shelter. The question then being...can a cis-woman's shelter discriminate against trans-women? peace and love to all in their small corner, and i in mine.....
B-Man Posted August 19, 2018 Posted August 19, 2018 Bill Maher is wrong about a great many things. But he’s 100% correct about free speech. Quote The HillVerified account @thehill FollowFollow @thehill Bill Maher warns "we're losing" the concept of free speech: "I don’t like Alex Jones, but Alex Jones gets to speak" http://hill.cm/KuJX9y0 .
Chef Jim Posted August 19, 2018 Posted August 19, 2018 10 minutes ago, B-Man said: Bill Maher is wrong about a great many things. But he’s 100% correct about free speech. . I also agree. What’s the purpose of the ban? Who are they trying to “protect”?
Deranged Rhino Posted August 19, 2018 Posted August 19, 2018 8 minutes ago, Chef Jim said: I also agree. What’s the purpose of the ban? Who are they trying to “protect”? In the case of Alex Jones, they are trying to inflame his popularity and drive more people to his channel. (because he's controlled opposition, they'd rather make a martyr of a cut-out like Jones who pushes disinformation than make a martyr out of an alternative news source that pushes real information) 1
DC Tom Posted August 19, 2018 Posted August 19, 2018 1 hour ago, Chef Jim said: I also agree. What’s the purpose of the ban? Who are they trying to “protect”? People who's feelings might be hurt. People who hear him say that Sandy Hook was faked, and get upset by it. Seems to me that the problem there isn't Jones, as much as it is people who get offended by him because they somehow forgot that crackpots shouldn't be taken seriously. 1
B-Man Posted August 21, 2018 Posted August 21, 2018 IT’S A BEAUTIFUL THING, WINSTON, THE DESTRUCTION OF WORDS: Healthline says, using the medical term ‘vagina’ is not gender-inclusive language, uses ‘front hole’ instead. I’m looking forward to the next presentation of The Front Hole Monologues. UPDATE: James Woods tweets, “The good news is that ‘!@#$’ will still be used for the idiot who came up with this…” by Ed Driscoll 1
Azalin Posted August 21, 2018 Posted August 21, 2018 On 8/19/2018 at 10:39 AM, B-Man said: Bill Maher is wrong about a great many things. But he’s 100% correct about free speech. . Maher annoys the hell out of me, but as far as I can remember he's always been very consistent on the issue of free speech.
3rdnlng Posted August 21, 2018 Posted August 21, 2018 45 minutes ago, B-Man said: IT’S A BEAUTIFUL THING, WINSTON, THE DESTRUCTION OF WORDS: Healthline says, using the medical term ‘vagina’ is not gender-inclusive language, uses ‘front hole’ instead. I’m looking forward to the next presentation of The Front Hole Monologues. UPDATE: James Woods tweets, “The good news is that ‘!@#$’ will still be used for the idiot who came up with this…” by Ed Driscoll Wow, someone has sand in their front hole.
Kevbeau Posted August 21, 2018 Posted August 21, 2018 12 hours ago, B-Man said: IT’S A BEAUTIFUL THING, WINSTON, THE DESTRUCTION OF WORDS: Healthline says, using the medical term ‘vagina’ is not gender-inclusive language, uses ‘front hole’ instead. I’m looking forward to the next presentation of The Front Hole Monologues. UPDATE: James Woods tweets, “The good news is that ‘!@#$’ will still be used for the idiot who came up with this…” by Ed Driscoll I’m starting to consider James Woods a national treasure. Unhinged...maybe, but he’s been throwing some funny $&@? Out there lately. 1
Koko78 Posted August 21, 2018 Posted August 21, 2018 37 minutes ago, Kevbeau said: I’m starting to consider James Woods a national treasure. Unhinged...maybe, but he’s been throwing some funny $&@? Out there lately. He has no restrictions now. He's been blackballed by Hollywood, after he made enough money not to have to worry about working ever again - he doesn't have to give a !@#$.
Joe Miner Posted August 21, 2018 Posted August 21, 2018 17 hours ago, B-Man said: IT’S A BEAUTIFUL THING, WINSTON, THE DESTRUCTION OF WORDS: Healthline says, using the medical term ‘vagina’ is not gender-inclusive language, uses ‘front hole’ instead. I’m looking forward to the next presentation of The Front Hole Monologues. UPDATE: James Woods tweets, “The good news is that ‘!@#$’ will still be used for the idiot who came up with this…” by Ed Driscoll How dare you assume the orientation of my body. My body has infinite possibilities of orientation and I don't limit myself to front and back.
Recommended Posts