Jump to content

The Mizzou/Yale/PC/Free Speech Topic


FireChan

Recommended Posts

https://www.google.com/amp/s/nypost.com/2021/06/04/nyc-pyscho-fantasizes-about-shooting-white-people-in-yale-talk/amp/

 

Yale is so racist that this women gave this speech in April and no one reacted until it was put online and others could hear it. How does a group of people hear someone say they fantasize about killing based on race and have no reaction?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/5/2021 at 8:07 AM, Buffalo Timmy said:

https://www.google.com/amp/s/nypost.com/2021/06/04/nyc-pyscho-fantasizes-about-shooting-white-people-in-yale-talk/amp/

 

Yale is so racist that this women gave this speech in April and no one reacted until it was put online and others could hear it. How does a group of people hear someone say they fantasize about killing based on race and have no reaction?

 

 

Of course she does..............thats what al liberals do.

 

Yale-Associated Psychiatrist Who Dreamed of Murdering White People Doubles Down, Calls Her Critics Racist.

 

Fantasizes about killing whites..............calls her critics racist.

 

https://redstate.com/alexparker/2021/06/08/psychiatrist-who-dreamed-of-murdering-white-people-doubles-down-calls-her-critics-racist-n393730 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

BATTLING THE LEFT ON THE GROUND

by John Hindraker

 

The Left controls almost all of America’s public schools, as well as its allegedly elite private schools. Leftists are moving rapidly to refashion education to inculcate our children in a bizarre revisionist history that is intended to cause them to hate their own country. This effort proceeds mostly under the banner of Critical Race Theory. It represents, I think, an existential threat to our country’s future.

 

 

Critical Race Theory is essentially racism, circa 1850. It holds that

1) the most important thing about a person is his or her skin color,

2) you have rights as a member of a racial group, not as an individual, and

3) members of the same racial group have similar personality and character traits.

 

John C. Calhoun must be smiling, wherever he now resides. He was the intellectual leader of the Democratic Party in 1840, and he still is today.

 

The rot in America’s public schools can be stopped only by a grass roots effort that educates parents and drives activism on a school district by school district basis. Here in Minnesota, that effort is being led by Center of the American Experiment. We are in the midst of a 17-city tour of the state, hitting six towns in Southern Minnesota this week.

 

More at the link: https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2021/06/battling-the-left-on-the-ground.php

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                              23bef841ca32ad44fd576bd360c9d0a2700161e2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                               eb7a921e1cf985fa77e409003cb6895cd2e90f5c                                 

 

 

 

 

 

           

 

 

 

 

Edited by B-Man
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
14 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 

 

THIS IS STUPID, AND A FIRST-AMENDMENT VIOLATION: 

 

A New Florida Bill Could Criminalize Filming Cops on the Job.

 

 

https://reason.com/2021/07/27/florida-bill-criminalize-filming-cops-first-amendment/

 

 

 

 

Weird. But at least according to quotes in the article it didn't outlaw recording per se. I guess the concern is you couldn't get a good video that far away?

 

Sounds like a dumb idea anyway.

Edited by reddogblitz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 

 

THIS IS STUPID, AND A FIRST-AMENDMENT VIOLATION: 

 

A New Florida Bill Could Criminalize Filming Cops on the Job.

 

 

https://reason.com/2021/07/27/florida-bill-criminalize-filming-cops-first-amendment/

 

 

 

That's an awful headline.

 

All it does it give officers room to do their job. It has nothing to do with filming.

 

Ironically, we have numerous closeup video of rioters blindsiding cops trying to arrest their associates.

On 7/21/2021 at 9:57 AM, B-Man said:

 

New Headline:

"Racist judges legalize violence against Alphabet community."

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, unbillievable said:

That's an awful headline.

 

All it does it give officers room to do their job. It has nothing to do with filming.

 

 

 

The legislation, would make it unlawful to "interrupt, disrupt, hinder, impede, or interfere" with a police officer within that radius. It would also criminalize "indirect[] harass[ment]." Whether or not someone crosses that line would be up to the discretion of the officer, and would be punished by a $500 fine and up to 60 days in jail.

 

 

It is beyond debate that the public has a constitutional right to film police on the job. "There is a long line of First Amendment case law from the high court that supports the right to record the police," notes the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a nonprofit that advocates for digital rights. "Federal appellate courts in the First…Third, Fifth, Seventh, Ninth, and Eleventh Circuits have directly upheld this right."

 

"It's hard to see such a blanket ban as anything but a targeted assault on First Amendment activity," says Ari Cohn, a First Amendment lawyer who works at TechFreedom, a think tank dedicated to technology issues. "Cops have long tried claiming that the act of filming them in itself obstructs their ability to do their job…and now that this argument failed, they are rather transparently trying to create a safe space from observation by the people they are sworn to serve."

 

House Bill 11 seeks to circumvent the Constitution, giving Florida officers a weapon to shut down public documentation under the guise of "harassment" that, as stated in the bill, does not have to be "direct." It remains unclear what would qualify as indirect harassment, though filming seems like a good candidate.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

The legislation, would make it unlawful to "interrupt, disrupt, hinder, impede, or interfere" with a police officer within that radius. It would also criminalize "indirect[] harass[ment]." Whether or not someone crosses that line would be up to the discretion of the officer, and would be punished by a $500 fine and up to 60 days in jail.

 

 

It is beyond debate that the public has a constitutional right to film police on the job. "There is a long line of First Amendment case law from the high court that supports the right to record the police," notes the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a nonprofit that advocates for digital rights. "Federal appellate courts in the First…Third, Fifth, Seventh, Ninth, and Eleventh Circuits have directly upheld this right."

 

"It's hard to see such a blanket ban as anything but a targeted assault on First Amendment activity," says Ari Cohn, a First Amendment lawyer who works at TechFreedom, a think tank dedicated to technology issues. "Cops have long tried claiming that the act of filming them in itself obstructs their ability to do their job…and now that this argument failed, they are rather transparently trying to create a safe space from observation by the people they are sworn to serve."

 

House Bill 11 seeks to circumvent the Constitution, giving Florida officers a weapon to shut down public documentation under the guise of "harassment" that, as stated in the bill, does not have to be "direct." It remains unclear what would qualify as indirect harassment, though filming seems like a good candidate.

 

 

 

The article starts with two false premises that it's a bill against filming and that you need to be within 30ft to get something on video.

 

 

As CNN proved, it's much easier to get the whole truth if you show a wider angle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...