truth on hold Posted November 9, 2015 Posted November 9, 2015 This could be one of the only excuses that would absolve bush from committing the worst crime of the new millennium. And sadly I have to add "so far"
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted November 9, 2015 Posted November 9, 2015 This could be one of the only excuses that would absolve bush from committing the worst crime of the new millennium. And sadly I have to add "so far" *prepares popcorn* And which crime would that be?
Chef Jim Posted November 10, 2015 Posted November 10, 2015 To be fair, on the topic of brain dead gatorman is this boards SME Not brain dead. Bread dead.
KD in CA Posted November 10, 2015 Posted November 10, 2015 Cute. You cherry-picked what you wanted to use to rile people up, and ignored the rest that explained it's bull ****, thinking (correctly) that no one else would read the whole thing. Not crayonz-worthy trolling...but pretty good, nonetheless. Except that as usual the only one he managed to rile up was himself.
Chef Jim Posted November 10, 2015 Posted November 10, 2015 This could be one of the only excuses that would absolve bush from committing the worst crime of the new millennium. And sadly I have to add "so far" So Reagan being in the early stages of Alzheimer's during his presidency absolves Bush of committing some horrific crime?
truth on hold Posted November 10, 2015 Posted November 10, 2015 (edited) So Reagan being in the early stages of Alzheimer's during his presidency absolves Bush of committing some horrific crime? Not being able to follow the comment refers solely to bush implicates you as being in advanced stages Edited November 10, 2015 by JTSP
....lybob Posted November 10, 2015 Posted November 10, 2015 Not being able to follow the comment refers solely to bush implicates you as being in advanced stages Chef doesn't have Alzheimer's but he's had many pan to head accidents
Chef Jim Posted November 10, 2015 Posted November 10, 2015 Not being able to follow the comment refers solely to bush implicates you as being in advanced stages Oh I was able to follow your comment I was just wondering what the !@#$ it has to do with a conversation about Reagan?
....lybob Posted November 10, 2015 Posted November 10, 2015 (edited) Oh I was able to follow your comment I was just wondering what the !@#$ it has to do with a conversation about Reagan? Has there ever been a thread with more than 4 posts that hasn't been hijacked - sorry that a hard question especially for someone with as many pan to head accidents as you Edited November 10, 2015 by ....lybob
bbb Posted November 10, 2015 Posted November 10, 2015 I love Reagan, but I remember watching the 1989 MLB All Star Game and he was "announcing" an inning or two with Vin Scully, since that is how he got his start.............I was like damn, he was our president 7 months ago? I'd much rather have had Vin Scully having the nuclear football!
jr1 Posted November 10, 2015 Posted November 10, 2015 The cabinet does all the work anyway. The president is just a signature
/dev/null Posted November 10, 2015 Posted November 10, 2015 I love Reagan, but I remember watching the 1989 MLB All Star Game and he was "announcing" an inning or two with Vin Scully, since that is how he got his start.............I was like damn, he was our president 7 months ago? I'd much rather have had Vin Scully having the nuclear football! Vin Scully would have been a great President or diplomat with that smooth voice. World leaders would have lined up just to have a chat
Rob's House Posted November 10, 2015 Posted November 10, 2015 https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/erik-wemple/wp/2015/11/08/in-epic-clash-with-george-will-over-killing-reagan-fox-news-host-bill-oreilly-renounces-journalism/ Seems to have touched a nerve with the St. Reagan crowd. Lol, this WAS when the White House was giving weapons to Iran, though Sounds like you and Reagan had some common ground after all.
birdog1960 Posted November 11, 2015 Posted November 11, 2015 (edited) anyone that takes out o'reilly is ok in my book. george will just further emasculated the eunuch leprechaun: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/bill-oreilly-makes-a-mess-of-history/2015/11/10/03ef0d94-87d9-11e5-be8b-1ae2e4f50f76_story.html. say what you want about will but compared to o'reilly, he's the pinnacle of virtue and intellect. oh and he writes pretty well too. O’Reilly impales himself on a contradiction: He says his book is “laudatory” about Reagan — and that it is being attacked by Reagan “guardians” and “loyalists.” How odd. Liberals, who have long recognized that to discredit conservatism they must devalue Reagan’s presidency, surely are delighted with O’Reilly’s assistance. The diaspora of Reagan administration alumni, and the conservative movement, now recognize O’Reilly as an opportunistic interloper. ha, ha , ha. delighted. Edited November 11, 2015 by birdog1960
KD in CA Posted November 11, 2015 Posted November 11, 2015 Honest opinions: should I go for it? Y/N I kept a 6' x 3' poster board with that logo for at least 25 years after '84. Best election ever. I'd say go for it but I'm not a tank top guy.
birdog1960 Posted November 11, 2015 Posted November 11, 2015 Honest opinions: should I go for it? Y/N i'm thinking this is much better but clearly wouldn't fit you. http://ep.yimg.com/ay/computergear/eschew-obfuscation-funny-t-shirt-3.gif
/dev/null Posted November 11, 2015 Posted November 11, 2015 I kept a 6' x 3' poster board with that logo for at least 25 years after '84. Best election ever. I'd say go for it but I'm not a tank top guy. 1984 is the first election that I have a memory of. I remember my Dad asking me if I could vote, would I vote for the President or the guy who wants to raise my taxes. Dad was a stereotypical Reagan Democrat. White cop in a Rust Belt city
Recommended Posts