/dev/null Posted May 19, 2015 Author Share Posted May 19, 2015 LOOT THE !@#$ING BEST BUY!!! How about Bed Bath & Beyond? No Juicer, No Peace! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gugny Posted May 20, 2015 Share Posted May 20, 2015 That data is a bit dubious, because it throws in less at fault (includes cases where motorcycle is passing a car making a left turn) More data points http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/motorcycle-accidents-common-causes-30330.html http://www.iii.org/issue-update/motorcycle-crashes The vast majority of left turn accidents are when the driver of an automobile doesn't see a bike coming from the left, and they pull out, ending up with the bike hitting the car at full speed, depending on reaction time. It's most riders' greatest fear. I think the data is very accurate. Probably fair to say that 90% of the 20% of bikers at fault were being dicks. But I think most bikers are responsible. It's really pretty stupid not to be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted May 20, 2015 Share Posted May 20, 2015 The vast majority of left turn accidents are when the driver of an automobile doesn't see a bike coming from the left, and they pull out, ending up with the bike hitting the car at full speed, depending on reaction time. It's most riders' greatest fear. I think the data is very accurate. Probably fair to say that 90% of the 20% of bikers at fault were being dicks. But I think most bikers are responsible. It's really pretty stupid not to be. With regard to your remark about most bikers being responsible I think it's safe to say you've not driven the CA freeways much. Those guys are crazy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbb Posted May 20, 2015 Share Posted May 20, 2015 The vast majority of left turn accidents are when the driver of an automobile doesn't see a bike coming from the left, and they pull out, ending up with the bike hitting the car at full speed, depending on reaction time. It's most riders' greatest fear. I think the data is very accurate. Probably fair to say that 90% of the 20% of bikers at fault were being dicks. But I think most bikers are responsible. It's really pretty stupid not to be. I can't imagine how great of a feeling riding a bike must be - to put yourself in so much danger. I love the feeling of skiing. It would have to be at least double that for me to get on a bike. I do think bike deaths are way down this year. Usually that third page of the local news in the Buffalo News would have had 10 deaths by now. I think there's only been one this year. Putting your lives in the hands of idiots texting all the time just is too much now, even if you do everything perfect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LB3 Posted May 20, 2015 Share Posted May 20, 2015 Disgusting article. The writer should be fired for being a moron. https://www.yahoo.com/news/see-difference-between-perceptions-waco-baltimore-071956990.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledInIllinois Posted May 20, 2015 Share Posted May 20, 2015 (edited) http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2015/05/19/waco-biker-charges/27594377/ It is literally grinding the system to a halt. WTF? Edited May 20, 2015 by ExiledInIllinois Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob's House Posted May 20, 2015 Share Posted May 20, 2015 Disgusting article. The writer should be fired for being a moron. https://www.yahoo.com/news/see-difference-between-perceptions-waco-baltimore-071956990.html That was a pretty stupid piece. He compares the biker shootout to Ferguson and Baltimore protests (as though a feud between rival gangs is in any way analogous to protests), then admits it's not an "apples-to-apples" comparison (ya think?), then proceeds to draw a conclusion (which is not only contrived but also a bit disconnected from the rest of the article) based on the assumption that it is a relevant comparison. I regret giving that (*^*&%^$^#another click. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledInIllinois Posted May 20, 2015 Share Posted May 20, 2015 I can't imagine how great of a feeling riding a bike must be - to put yourself in so much danger. I love the feeling of skiing. It would have to be at least double that for me to get on a bike. I do think bike deaths are way down this year. Usually that third page of the local news in the Buffalo News would have had 10 deaths by now. I think there's only been one this year. Putting your lives in the hands of idiots texting all the time just is too much now, even if you do everything perfect. True. Seems traffic deaths are down in Illinois. They post it on sign boards... I see one every day on my way to work. We are on pace for about 700 or so, but summer months are coming. I wonder how many are bikes? Thank "Global Warming!" ;-) Last year the numbers were down too... Coincidence we are having colder winters? Anyway... I think people in cars have a hard time judging a bikes speed and distance when making a left. That usually doesn't end well... Even if there is never a collison, the bike could be dumped. The two (bikes and cars) are simply oil and water on the road... Just like the "I hate bicycles thread." You have one bigger and one smaller, and one will always lose if there is a collision. There are times, they simply are not seen until it is too late. Maybe it is because I work on the water, I subscribe to the "stay the heck away from anything bigger approach... Or get away from anything bigger approach." You would never ride in the blind spot of anybody? Or would you? It's all too much of an unecessary risk to save a few bucks in a world that simply doesn't give a two poops about doing anything "right." I agree, why would I put my trust in other's hands and expect them to get it right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LB3 Posted May 20, 2015 Share Posted May 20, 2015 That was a pretty stupid piece. He compares the biker shootout to Ferguson and Baltimore protests (as though a feud between rival gangs is in any way analogous to protests), then admits it's not an "apples-to-apples" comparison (ya think?), then proceeds to draw a conclusion (which is not only contrived but also a bit disconnected from the rest of the article) based on the assumption that it is a relevant comparison. I regret giving that (*^*&%^$^#another click. Perfect summary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gugny Posted May 20, 2015 Share Posted May 20, 2015 With regard to your remark about most bikers being responsible I think it's safe to say you've not driven the CA freeways much. Those guys are crazy. I've not. Only once in my life, actually. I'm sure the number of idiot riders in CA is very high, but I still believe that most - nationwide - are responsible. I honestly don't know why anyone would be stupid on a bike. As bbb said, the ass holes texting are the biggest problem. The left-hand turn accidents are mainly due to the automobile drivers not looking closely enough. I wouldn't go so far as to call them negligent. But the texters ... they are the most dangerous drivers on the road. More dangerous than the 16-year olds; more dangerous than the elderly; more dangerous than the drunks. Those drivers are all doing the one thing that texters cannot do ... looking at the road. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted May 20, 2015 Share Posted May 20, 2015 I've not. Only once in my life, actually. I'm sure the number of idiot riders in CA is very high, but I still believe that most - nationwide - are responsible. I honestly don't know why anyone would be stupid on a bike. As bbb said, the ass holes texting are the biggest problem. The left-hand turn accidents are mainly due to the automobile drivers not looking closely enough. I wouldn't go so far as to call them negligent. But the texters ... they are the most dangerous drivers on the road. More dangerous than the 16-year olds; more dangerous than the elderly; more dangerous than the drunks. Those drivers are all doing the one thing that texters cannot do ... looking at the road. Oh I know most bikers are responsible. Especially the ones I'm familiar with in WNY that mostly ride back roads. The crazies in CA that lane split at 80-90 and sneak up on you. When you're difficult to see in the first place sneaking up on cars is just plain stupid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gugny Posted May 20, 2015 Share Posted May 20, 2015 Oh I know most bikers are responsible. Especially the ones I'm familiar with in WNY that mostly ride back roads. The crazies in CA that lane split at 80-90 and sneak up on you. When you're difficult to see in the first place sneaking up on cars is just plain stupid. Agree 100%. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted May 20, 2015 Share Posted May 20, 2015 Oh I know most bikers are responsible. Especially the ones I'm familiar with in WNY that mostly ride back roads. The crazies in CA that lane split at 80-90 and sneak up on you. When you're difficult to see in the first place sneaking up on cars is just plain stupid. Yup, my experience last week. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azalin Posted May 20, 2015 Share Posted May 20, 2015 Oh I know most bikers are responsible. Especially the ones I'm familiar with in WNY that mostly ride back roads. The crazies in CA that lane split at 80-90 and sneak up on you. When you're difficult to see in the first place sneaking up on cars is just plain stupid. The volunteer fire fighters around here refer to motorcyclists as 'organ donors'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob's House Posted May 20, 2015 Share Posted May 20, 2015 The volunteer fire fighters around here refer to motorcyclists as 'organ donors'. I've heard crotch rockets referred to as donor-cycles Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gugny Posted May 20, 2015 Share Posted May 20, 2015 The volunteer fire fighters around here refer to motorcyclists as 'organ donors'. Funny. We call our local volunteer firefighters, "arsonists." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azalin Posted May 21, 2015 Share Posted May 21, 2015 Funny. We call our local volunteer firefighters, "arsonists." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerball Posted May 21, 2015 Share Posted May 21, 2015 I honestly don't know why anyone would be stupid on a bike. Not everyone gets all of their daily stupidity out of their system at a keyboard.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerball Posted May 29, 2015 Share Posted May 29, 2015 With regard to your remark about most bikers being responsible I think it's safe to say you've not driven the CA freeways much. Those guys are crazy. http://www.latimes.com/business/autos/la-fi-hy-motorcycle-lanesplitting-20150528-story.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted May 29, 2015 Share Posted May 29, 2015 http://www.latimes.com/business/autos/la-fi-hy-motorcycle-lanesplitting-20150528-story.html The problem for me really isn't that a motorcycle is allowed to weave through traffic that is otherwise at a standstill. The problem is that they do it regardless of the speed of traffic. I'm often tempted to open my door when I see them coming. So what they're trying to legalize is that a motorcycle can split lanes if regular traffic is going up to 35 mph, and that to me is just a bad idea. Unfortunately, on the list of bad ideas in California, this one down on the bottom for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts