FireChan Posted October 22, 2015 Posted October 22, 2015 Let me preface this topic with saying that I do, and did, agree with the Alonso trade. We have all seen what Shady can do when healthy, and even hobbled on this team, he showed a lot this past game against the Bengals, without much threat from the passing game. But. Did we devalue him a little too much? Remembering the way he was used in Pettine's system, when he had a DROY runner-up season, he seemed to be something this team could really use. A LB that was used to great effect against the pass, who was one of the chief players when disguising blitzes, or showing blitzes and dropping off in coverage. I watched this (I know it's a highlight video, but it's the best I can do.) I noted Kiko's position in a lot of his highlights. Dropping into the middle of the field to protect against quick-ins and slants, he produced. Obviously the TO well dried up early as it is wont to do, but still. His effectiveness on short to intermediate routes across the middle was apparent. He wasn't a player without his negatives, namely getting swallowed up on run blocks. But would he have fit this system perhaps better than Bradham or Brown, two LB's who haven't had a great year in pass coverage, a similar system that he excelled in back in 2013 (even if he wasn't perfect)? Again, reiterating that I still agree with the trade. And even if he is a better fit, I still would've pulled the trigger on the trade. But I thought I wouldn't notice much of a drop off. And let's ignore injuries for a second, because this topic will quickly die if the only dialogue is "injury-prone, couldn't help in street clothes."
FireChan Posted October 22, 2015 Author Posted October 22, 2015 You mean the guy who has played in what one game this year? You may be better off having a signature that says, "I didn't read the OP."
Mr. WEO Posted October 22, 2015 Posted October 22, 2015 I think the legend of Kiko was more useful than the man himself....
bills_fan_in_raleigh Posted October 22, 2015 Posted October 22, 2015 I hate watching manny Lawson try to play LB. last year he got killed in run game and under petite and Rex he's vulnerable in the pass game. Another good outside lb that can cover would be great versus dropping Kyle and Mario I to pass coverage.
BADOLBILZ Posted October 22, 2015 Posted October 22, 2015 Let me preface this topic with saying that I do, and did, agree with the Alonso trade. We have all seen what Shady can do when healthy, and even hobbled on this team, he showed a lot this past game against the Bengals, without much threat from the passing game. But. Did we devalue him a little too much? Remembering the way he was used in Pettine's system, when he had a DROY runner-up season, he seemed to be something this team could really use. A LB that was used to great effect against the pass, who was one of the chief players when disguising blitzes, or showing blitzes and dropping off in coverage. I watched this (I know it's a highlight video, but it's the best I can do.) I noted Kiko's position in a lot of his highlights. Dropping into the middle of the field to protect against quick-ins and slants, he produced. Obviously the TO well dried up early as it is wont to do, but still. His effectiveness on short to intermediate routes across the middle was apparent. He wasn't a player without his negatives, namely getting swallowed up on run blocks. But would he have fit this system perhaps better than Bradham or Brown, two LB's who haven't had a great year in pass coverage, a similar system that he excelled in back in 2013 (even if he wasn't perfect)? Again, reiterating that I still agree with the trade. And even if he is a better fit, I still would've pulled the trigger on the trade. But I thought I wouldn't notice much of a drop off. And let's ignore injuries for a second, because this topic will quickly die if the only dialogue is "injury-prone, couldn't help in street clothes." A player like Alonso is of great value in any modern system. Instinctive coverage LB's with hands to make a play on the football are defensive gold. Yes, teams are wearing out Brown and Bradham with coverage responsibilities. They are best going forward and Schwartz defense dared teams to run and forced them to do it up the middle. Getting McCoy wasn't the problem........giving up too much and then paying him as if he were a free agent coming off a career year rather than a high mileage back coming off of a down year were the issues. Alonso has another ligament issue this season......but I don't believe the Bills knew it was going to happen and I am almost entirely certain.....based on past moves with DeSean Jackson and Evan Mathis......that McCoy was going to be otherwise released.... and at worst could have been had for a late round pick. Instead they traded a high ceiling chip for negotiating rights.
Max997 Posted October 22, 2015 Posted October 22, 2015 (edited) You may be better off having a signature that says, "I didn't read the OP." You may be better off not bringing up a topic that has already been talked to death Let it go Edited October 22, 2015 by Max997
Coach Tuesday Posted October 22, 2015 Posted October 22, 2015 In a passing league in a division with the best passing QB in a generation - yes, we should've kept Kiko.
FireChan Posted October 22, 2015 Author Posted October 22, 2015 (edited) You may be better off not bringing up a topic that has already been talked to death Let it go Look, it's another poster who doesn't realize if he doesn't want to talk about something, he doesn't have to post in the topic. Maybe I should have brought up a topic about Rex and the defense, or TT vs. EJ, those topics are very fresh. Let what go exactly? A player like Alonso is of great value in any modern system. Instinctive coverage LB's with hands to make a play on the football are defensive gold. Yes, teams are wearing out Brown and Bradham with coverage responsibilities. They are best going forward and Schwartz defense dared teams to run and forced them to do it up the middle. Getting McCoy wasn't the problem........giving up too much and then paying him as if he were a free agent coming off a career year rather than a high mileage back coming off of a down year were the issues. Alonso has another ligament issue this season......but I don't believe the Bills knew it was going to happen and I am almost entirely certain.....based on past moves with DeSean Jackson and Evan Mathis......that McCoy was going to be otherwise released.... and at worst could have been had for a late round pick. Instead they traded a high ceiling chip for negotiating rights. Were Rex's LB's in NY great coverage LB's? I don't really know. Edited October 22, 2015 by FireChan
BADOLBILZ Posted October 22, 2015 Posted October 22, 2015 Look, it's another poster who doesn't realize if he doesn't want to talk about something, he doesn't have to post in the topic. Maybe I should have brought up a topic about Rex and the defense, or TT vs. EJ, those topics are very fresh. Let what go exactly? Were Rex's LB's in NY great coverage LB's? I don't really know. Being smart/instinctive was a requirement. Bradham is kind of a cement head. He really struggled in Pettine's system and is quite possibly the guy who is most confused about his assignments in this defense. Brown is a smart player but just isn't that good laterally or dropping into coverage.
John from Riverside Posted October 22, 2015 Posted October 22, 2015 (edited) I thought Kiko was EXTREMELY talented......he was a very good cover linebacker and gave QBs fits however THere was something about his play (at MLB) that was starting to really concern me in the latter part of the season.....I mostly attibuted it to a rookie who was not used to a 16 game NFL season......starting to overpursue.....starting to not be able to get off blocks Then the Knee injury I would like to a have a Kiko Alonzo type linebacker on this team right now....(although I think we might have one in Randal Johnson....he is playing on special teams I hope he starts getting more playing time eventually) Edited October 22, 2015 by John from Hemet
White Linen Posted October 22, 2015 Posted October 22, 2015 It was an excellent move. McCoy is the type of player to help you get to the playoffs and Kiko isn't.
FireChan Posted October 22, 2015 Author Posted October 22, 2015 It was an excellent move. McCoy is the type of player to help you get to the playoffs and Kiko isn't. Freedom!
Rob's House Posted October 22, 2015 Posted October 22, 2015 So you'd rather have an injury prone LB over an all-pro RB? How useful is he in street clothes?
BADOLBILZ Posted October 22, 2015 Posted October 22, 2015 I thought Kiko was EXTREMELY talented......he was a very good cover linebacker and gave QBs fits however THere was something about his play (at MLB) that was starting to really concern me in the latter part of the season.....I mostly attibuted it to a rookie who was not used to a 16 game NFL season......starting to overpursue.....starting to not be able to get off blocks Then the Knee injury I would like to a have a Kiko Alonzo type linebacker on this team right now....(although I think we might have one in Randal Johnson....he is playing on special teams I hope he starts getting more playing time eventually) It was concerning that he was often the only actual LB on the second level of the field.....Hughes/Lawson and Mario were basically pass rushers almost all the time. It got to the point where he was clearly having to guess to have a good chance of being in position to cover 4 gaps he was responsible for. The situation was becoming ridiculous late in the year. Bradham not being able to handle the responsibilities was a huge problem that year. It was expected that he was going to make a big step up. Dumbing down with Schwartz created Nigel......who then made one of my all-time favorite tackles when he slammed the Jets RB Ivory to the ground by his lady locks. This team needs to get back to dumbed-down defense.......Rex D is not only ineffective at keeping teams off the scoreboard it is also boring as f*ck.....unless you live to watch ONLY the two boundary corners play man up.
FireChan Posted October 22, 2015 Author Posted October 22, 2015 So you'd rather have an injury prone LB over an all-pro RB? How useful is he in street clothes? You are a real bastard.
Alphadawg7 Posted October 22, 2015 Posted October 22, 2015 Let me preface this topic with saying that I do, and did, agree with the Alonso trade. We have all seen what Shady can do when healthy, and even hobbled on this team, he showed a lot this past game against the Bengals, without much threat from the passing game. But. Did we devalue him a little too much? Remembering the way he was used in Pettine's system, when he had a DROY runner-up season, he seemed to be something this team could really use. A LB that was used to great effect against the pass, who was one of the chief players when disguising blitzes, or showing blitzes and dropping off in coverage. I watched this (I know it's a highlight video, but it's the best I can do.) I noted Kiko's position in a lot of his highlights. Dropping into the middle of the field to protect against quick-ins and slants, he produced. Obviously the TO well dried up early as it is wont to do, but still. His effectiveness on short to intermediate routes across the middle was apparent. He wasn't a player without his negatives, namely getting swallowed up on run blocks. But would he have fit this system perhaps better than Bradham or Brown, two LB's who haven't had a great year in pass coverage, a similar system that he excelled in back in 2013 (even if he wasn't perfect)? Again, reiterating that I still agree with the trade. And even if he is a better fit, I still would've pulled the trigger on the trade. But I thought I wouldn't notice much of a drop off. And let's ignore injuries for a second, because this topic will quickly die if the only dialogue is "injury-prone, couldn't help in street clothes." Its no secret I was high on Kiko as I was singing his praises on draft night. But, for an athletic LB to have had 2 major knee operations, one to each knee, before his sophomore season in the NFL is something that can't be disregarded when evaluation his future. His value is based on his mobility and athletic ability, and after he blew his other knee out, his future certainly was a little more murky as to how he would come back. Ignoring that fact, which you really can't but I will do anyway, and focusing on the talent alone, Kiko is a promising players, always has been. I will say, Kiko tailed off quite a bit towards his end of his rookie season and definitely at his best in the first half the season IMO. That being said, its to be expected from rookies adjusting to playing 20 games between preseason and reg season. Would I have liked to have kept him, sure, just like everyone else. However, at the time of the trade, he definitely seemed very expendable considering the other promising LB's we had coming off impressive seasons. And he brought back an Elite talent at RB to help an offense which was the sore spot the year before. So, at the time of trade and as we sit now, we definitely got the better end of the deal trading a LB with 2 bad knees and only one season under his belt for an Elite overall player and RB in McCoy. Given Kiko is out for the season again, the trade appears more like trade rape then us just getting a good deal, and there is what lies the risk with dealing with a player who's already had a major surgery on both knees. Time of Trade, Bills grade A, Philly grade B- (if Kiko wasnt coming off knee surgery, would be an A, you can't get an A ever when trading for a player who hasn't seen the field yet after blowing out his knee). Now, Bills grade A+++, Philly grade C- (I wont give it lower than a C- because they are fine at RB and Kiko contributed a little this season and still could potentially come back and still be a good player next year).
John from Riverside Posted October 22, 2015 Posted October 22, 2015 It was concerning that he was often the only actual LB on the second level of the field.....Hughes/Lawson and Mario were basically pass rushers almost all the time. It got to the point where he was clearly having to guess to have a good chance of being in position to cover 4 gaps he was responsible for. The situation was becoming ridiculous late in the year. Bradham not being able to handle the responsibilities was a huge problem that year. It was expected that he was going to make a big step up. Dumbing down with Schwartz created Nigel......who then made one of my all-time favorite tackles when he slammed the Jets RB Ivory to the ground by his lady locks. This team needs to get back to dumbed-down defense.......Rex D is not only ineffective at keeping teams off the scoreboard it is also boring as f*ck.....unless you live to watch ONLY the two boundary corners play man up. I am just not understanding the reasoning behind it.....last years team was still effective against the run AND you got the sense that they were going to dominate every play Is it because they dont trust their safeties? THat is a possibility. I think that Gilmroe and Darby have shown that they can lock down at corner....... WHile I want to see offensive linemen drafted in this next draft....it would not shock me at all if our 1st pick this next draft is a safety
BADOLBILZ Posted October 22, 2015 Posted October 22, 2015 So you'd rather have an injury prone LB over an all-pro RB? How useful is he in street clothes? I am going to go out on a limb and disagree with your assertion that Shady is going to be all-pro this season. Or ever as a Buffalo Bill. Or ever again. For any team. But we couldn't have known that or seen any decline there, right? But we knew Kiko would be inactive much of this season in Philly due to a different ligament injury. We just knew that because, you know, he didn't play every single defensive snap as a rookie and hadn't recovered from an ACL tear years earlier and string together some outstanding seasons.
John from Riverside Posted October 22, 2015 Posted October 22, 2015 I am going to go out on a limb and disagree with your assertion that Shady is going to be all-pro this season. Or ever as a Buffalo Bill. Or ever again. For any team. But we couldn't have known that or seen any decline there, right? But we knew Kiko would be inactive much of this season in Philly due to a different ligament injury. We just knew that because, you know, he didn't play every single defensive snap as a rookie and hadn't recovered from an ACL tear years earlier and string together some outstanding seasons. I really did not expect kiko to get injured.....I thought what might happen is he might not be the same player after the injury that kept him out all of LAST season....but I expected (and still expect) Kiko to be a fine player I think it is way to early to make these predictions on Shady....no he will not be a all pro player this year....but he has been relatively healthy over his career and there is a good chance he is right back to form next season.....ESPECIALLY if we get our OL figured out
Recommended Posts