Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

accually I started the thread because I cant get that Sammy Watkins ankle injury out of my head. It has always been a concern of mine for a while now it just the latest injury and the complaints from the bengals took the cake

If we won the game and Sammy had 10 targets and 2 TD's would it really matter??
  • Replies 44
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

I attribute my bad knees to playing many later-year soccer games on artificial surfaces. And they always seems to hurt for a number of days after games played on artificial surfaces, when I would have almost no pain after playing on natural grass. Given the investment in player salaries, my vote would be for a natural grass field as it would help ensure at least half their games would be played on a a safer surface.

 

Some articles:

Mixed review, but interesting difference between men and women (maybe due to higher impact/weights):

http://www.philly.com/philly/blogs/sportsdoc/Grass-vs-Turf-does-it-affect-injury-rate.html

 

Also mixed but showing some evidence for difference between football (more injuries) and soccer:

http://sportswithoutinjury.com/truth-artificial-turf-injuries/

 

Claim of definitive increase in injury:

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/05/01/us-football-idUSBRE84002Q20120501

 

OK, so that is a bit much, but in case anyone is interested, there is a ton or search results for "artificial grass and knee injuries". I am biased based on experience but the evidence seems to support the case that artificial grass contributes to more injuries for football players. You might weigh in a bias of their being business interests supporting studies that refute such claims.

 

If I was T.P., I'd make the investment in a Green Bay like natural surface. It may even pay him dividends with less injuries.

Posted (edited)

I attribute my bad knees to playing many later-year soccer games on artificial surfaces. And they always seems to hurt for a number of days after games played on artificial surfaces, when I would have almost no pain after playing on natural grass. Given the investment in player salaries, my vote would be for a natural grass field as it would help ensure at least half their games would be played on a a safer surface.

 

Some articles:

Mixed review, but interesting difference between men and women (maybe due to higher impact/weights):

http://www.philly.com/philly/blogs/sportsdoc/Grass-vs-Turf-does-it-affect-injury-rate.html

 

Also mixed but showing some evidence for difference between football (more injuries) and soccer:

http://sportswithoutinjury.com/truth-artificial-turf-injuries/

 

Claim of definitive increase in injury:

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/05/01/us-football-idUSBRE84002Q20120501

 

OK, so that is a bit much, but in case anyone is interested, there is a ton or search results for "artificial grass and knee injuries". I am biased based on experience but the evidence seems to support the case that artificial grass contributes to more injuries for football players. You might weigh in a bias of their being business interests supporting studies that refute such claims.

 

If I was T.P., I'd make the investment in a Green Bay like natural surface. It may even pay him dividends with less injuries.

http://www.totalprosports.com/2015/10/19/justin-tucker-missed-field-goal-levis-stadium-sinkhole/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=fbpages&utm_campaign=fb Edited by BringBackFergy
Posted

The turf is very slippery when wet. I'm surprised more players aren't falling. Was messing around on the field while Jim Kelly was giving the chalk talk in the one of the suites. Rained earlier but was drying out. We started kicking extra points and anytime we planted our feet we hit the ground. Entire group of kids came out laughing at us.

slips prevent acls and other strains, not cause them.

slips could cause injuries when your foot gets grip.
Posted

Great topic Protocol...hope the front office and the new owners who have enough money to replace it are listening.

 

We have been injury plagued for years now, despite always having a top training and strength/conditioning staff.

Posted

all artificial playing surfaces are a scourge on humanity.

 

this might sound silly, but i really feel bad for high school kids who hardly ever get to play on dirt/grass. When I think about playing high school football, i can still smell the grass, mud on our practice field. where i live, most of the fields are made of this awful awful stuff.

 

yes, they are slippery as hell when moisture hits them. if there is any sun the field turns to an oven. and who hasn't had the pleasure of picking those stupid rubber slivers out of clothes, ears, eyes, mouth, etc.?

 

i am not the least bit surprised they are suspected of increasing injury and i hope the Bills have a grass field again one day. of course it can be done...if they do it in Cleveland, Pittsburgh, Green Bay.

Posted

Wow. Haven't seen that happen before.... Didn't say he got hurt.

Sink holes in natural turf are possible...but it changed the outcome of the game. Just like a WR or TE slipping and missing a pass could change the outcome of the game. The grass isn't always greener on the other side. :lol:

Posted

If the Packers can have it, there is no doubt we can too. That being said it is a lot more expensive.

There is no 12 year warranty on a natural field.

The Pack will occasionally re-sod portions of the field late in the season $$$

They don't let anything happen on the field during the season. No concerts, nothing.

They have had a lot of problems with their in-ground heating systems.

 

Lambeau does get rough late in the year, but hell that is how football was meant to be played.

Posted

Watch a game at FedEx field when Washington plays at home. That grass field ifs horrible.

 

Hell, watch any game on grass and you can see a boatload of divots. A poorly kept grass field can be just as dangerous as a slippery field turf in my opinion.

Posted

Terry may have plans to collect all the gas that many years of crappy football has produced under Buffalo.. the last 15 years have made the ground beneath the Ralph a primary source

Posted

I'm fully backing this thread - our A-Turf has been slippery ever since it was installed. I'd even be in favor of Field Turf if we can't have natural grass (though I don't see why not, as been pointed out, several cold weather stadiums have 'em).

 

No more rando slipping - unless it's the other team's players! :beer:

×
×
  • Create New...