Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted (edited)

@ProFootballTalk: Zach Brown not fined for tackle that injured Tyrod Taylor http://t.co/8JekRsERMV

Apparently indicating that it was an incorrect call and not horse collar

Same play on Brady results in jail time and a rule change. Edited by 4merper4mer
Posted

On a somewhat related note. The best QB of all time Joe Montana said on the NFLN that back in his day the some players sprayed silicone on their jerseys

So the defender couldn't hold on too the jersey when trying that stunt.

Posted

Interesting that while not a horse collar by the letter of the law, it still led to injury in the same manner. I wonder if they'll be refining that rule in the future.

Posted

We did get away with the same thing with Bradham later.

 

Bradham's jersey grab was clearly away from the collar area and he wasn't fined for it. And Mariota wasn't bent backwards like TT was, much less injured on the play. So at best you can say that the Titans didn't get an undeserved call.

Posted

It was clearly never a horse collar tackle--almost everyone saw this.

 

No need to change the rule. Pulling a guy down by the back of the jersey can't be legislated out of the game because one player injured his leg. The rule wan't meant to mitigate that type of injury. They also aren't likely to change the rule to help those who didn't understand the rule to save face....

Posted (edited)

theyre right, it wasnt horse collar, grabbed jersey

He grabbed the inside of the jersey or very close too but regardless when TT was already down with legs buckled the guy kept ripping him further down. Thats dirty ball and when I played I would of never did that to anyone.

Edited by billsfan_34
Posted

It was clearly never a horse collar tackle--almost everyone saw this.

 

No need to change the rule. Pulling a guy down by the back of the jersey can't be legislated out of the game because one player injured his leg. The rule wan't meant to mitigate that type of injury. They also aren't likely to change the rule to help those who didn't understand the rule to save face....

 

Swing your partner do se do......Round and Round and Round we go.

Posted

It was clearly never a horse collar tackle--almost everyone saw this.

 

No need to change the rule. Pulling a guy down by the back of the jersey can't be legislated out of the game because one player injured his leg. The rule wan't meant to mitigate that type of injury. They also aren't likely to change the rule to help those who didn't understand the rule to save face....

Well that was the goal of the rule. Guys were getting knees blown out left and right. The tweak would simply change it from "inside the collar" to "above the nameplate" or something similar

 

I wouldn't expect that to happen though, unless we saw a few guys end up like tyrod

Posted

Well that was the goal of the rule. Guys were getting knees blown out left and right. The tweak would simply change it from "inside the collar" to "above the nameplate" or something similar

 

I wouldn't expect that to happen though, unless we saw a few guys end up like tyrod

 

I don't see any rule change coming. Too hard for them to interpret where the jersey was grabbed---they blew this call as the rule currently is written, imagine how bad it will be if they chnage the rule.

 

The rule currently makes no sense as a protector of runners or QBs as defenders are free to yank them down by the collar if they are in the tackle box/pocket.

Posted

It was not a horse collar but it was the exact type of tackle that makes horse collars illegal.

 

He grabbed Taylor just below the collar and pulled him backwards. It's a dangerous play.

 

Shouldn't be able to grab a player up around the collar either.

Posted

 

I don't see any rule change coming. Too hard for them to interpret where the jersey was grabbed---they blew this call as the rule currently is written, imagine how bad it will be if they chnage the rule.

 

The rule currently makes no sense as a protector of runners or QBs as defenders are free to yank them down by the collar if they are in the tackle box/pocket.

I think part is that a guy running in the open field is much more exposed to the type of knee injury, but I won't claim to be a horse collar expert.

 

I do agree that it won't change over 1 injury. The same fans that will call for the rule book already being too big and too hard to enforce often see to be the same ones that struggle with the idea that you aren't going to have a perfect system that has every possible situation covered. The rule in place is pretty good at protecting the players and pretty easily defined. Unless we see a spike in incidents, I'm ok with accepting that the status quo is fine.

Posted

 

I don't see any rule change coming. Too hard for them to interpret where the jersey was grabbed---they blew this call as the rule currently is written, imagine how bad it will be if they chnage the rule.

 

The rule currently makes no sense as a protector of runners or QBs as defenders are free to yank them down by the collar if they are in the tackle box/pocket.

It was close enough. He grabbed him by the name and pulled him backwards. In full speed it looks like a horse collar and actually was just as dangerous.

 

Bradham grabbed Mariota in the middle of the number.

Posted

It was close enough. He grabbed him by the name and pulled him backwards. In full speed it looks like a horse collar and actually was just as dangerous.

 

Bradham grabbed Mariota in the middle of the number.

 

...and pulled him backwards. Maybe all backwards pulls of any kind should be outlawed.

 

If MAriota was the one who was injured instead of TT, no one here would be posting on it, let alone calling for a rule change.

Posted

@ProFootballTalk: Zach Brown not fined for tackle that injured Tyrod Taylor http://t.co/8JekRsERMV

 

Apparently indicating that it was an incorrect call and not horse collar

 

 

But neither was Bradham , he wasn't even given a penalty for his tackle on Mariotta which was exactly the same tackle that happened to Taylor the Bills just got lucky on one only Tyrod got hurt & Mariotta didn't ...

Posted

...and pulled him backwards. Maybe all backwards pulls of any kind should be outlawed.

 

If MAriota was the one who was injured instead of TT, no one here would be posting on it, let alone calling for a rule change.

 

And if what had happened to TT had happened to Brady, you wouldn't be going all out to discredit the call.

Posted

 

...and pulled him backwards. Maybe all backwards pulls of any kind should be outlawed.

 

If MAriota was the one who was injured instead of TT, no one here would be posting on it, let alone calling for a rule change.

Yeah. Grabbing the jersey to make a tackle should be illegal. It's an easy call to make also.
×
×
  • Create New...