GunnerBill Posted September 28, 2015 Posted September 28, 2015 I thought Urbik looked good out there. Miller and Seantrell have been liabilities this year. I'm all for young guys learning to play, but sometimes you learn the best went you take a step back and watch too. I'm tired of waiting. its been 16 years since we have been to the playoffs. 16 years!!! At this point I dont give a rip about develping a G. Play the guy that has the best chance of helping us into the playoffs THIS year If I thought Urbik was better I'd agree. I don't think anyone is saying play Miller regardless they are saying they look about the same and in ties you stick with the younger guys. Henderson looked better yesterday too. His best game of the year. He seems to enjoy playing Miami for some reason. Didn't he go to college down there?
YoloinOhio Posted September 28, 2015 Author Posted September 28, 2015 (edited) If I thought Urbik was better I'd agree. I don't think anyone is saying play Miller regardless they are saying they look about the same and in ties you stick with the younger guys. Henderson looked better yesterday too. His best game of the year. He seems to enjoy playing Miami for some reason. Didn't he go to college down there? yes he went to U of Miami. That was a really good DL they played. Talent wise the Giants aren't the same though they have Hankins who is good (not Suh good). So hoping for another good week from the OL. I think the Giants DL is similar to the Colts. Hankins and Langford pretty close IMO in talent. Colts have been better against the run than what was expected but no pass rush. Edited September 28, 2015 by YoloinOhio
John from Riverside Posted September 28, 2015 Posted September 28, 2015 If Miller continues to develop this draft that we "mortgaged away" could end up being really fruitful with 3 immediate key contributors Anytime you can get 3 starting players out of a draft where you only had 6 picks that is GM of the year material
Webster Guy Posted September 28, 2015 Posted September 28, 2015 If Miller continues to develop this draft that we "mortgaged away" could end up being really fruitful with 3 immediate key contributors you mean when we gave up 19 first round picks for sammy.......
seadog Posted September 28, 2015 Posted September 28, 2015 Miller looked good yesterday he was one on one with su mostly and held his own before injury. Urbik played well also. Everybody played well. Eric Wood even looked all pro yesterday. I saw him block 2 at once in pass protect.
Doc Posted September 28, 2015 Posted September 28, 2015 Sam Malone rapping, right? Some kind of commercial? Local sports report.
BuffaninATL Posted September 28, 2015 Posted September 28, 2015 I thought Urbik looked good out there. Miller and Seantrell Glenn have been liabilities this year. I'm all for young guys learning to play, but sometimes you learn the best went you take a step back and watch too. I'm tired of waiting. its been 16 years since we have been to the playoffs. 16 years!!! At this point I dont give a rip about develping a G. Play the guy that has the best chance of helping us into the playoffs THIS year fixed for ya
CSBill Posted September 28, 2015 Posted September 28, 2015 (edited) Urbik played well, certainly no drop off. But, if Miller is 100%, as others have suggested, he needs to be out there. Edited September 28, 2015 by CSBill
Saxum Posted September 28, 2015 Posted September 28, 2015 Urbik is in the exact spot you want him to be......backing up the OG spots for a game here and there due to injury You HAVE to keep playing John Miller......he is young and only going to get better....... As long as he's healthy I think you play Miller. If Miller needs a week off to be 100% then let Urbik fill in. I think what you need to do is use frequent substitution like the Bills used to do with the swing tackle replacing the right or left tackle; at that time we really had 6 starting OL . Miller starts and when he seems tired or not seeing what is happening Urbik goes in and replaces him with the assistant OL coach working with him to show him what he is missing or give him a break. Remember he is a rookie and has not had to face this type of players every week in college.
Jmsbills Posted September 28, 2015 Posted September 28, 2015 Urbik is just what the "Doctor Ordered" he best backup Guard/Center in the NFL.
tombstone56 Posted September 28, 2015 Posted September 28, 2015 Not sure weather miller better than urbik yet but RICHIE is kicking some tail ,,,watched him alot ,he was crushing some guys
nucci Posted September 28, 2015 Posted September 28, 2015 Everyone who wanted to cut Urbik for cap reasons saw why we kept him yesterday. He is a great backup OG/C. Imagine if we kept Richardson instead. I trust him to start in Miller's place. However, I also agree with those saying we keep Miller going if he is healthy. He took a pretty big pay cut to stay. His cap number is reasonable now
bigK14094 Posted September 28, 2015 Posted September 28, 2015 Groin injuries are notorious for being lingering (like a hammy,actually) Miller will likely have this situation all year. Just a question of whether he can play with it. Back a few decades, I had one....and played the rest of the season. But, it hurt so bad I couldn't drive my stick shift, couldn't lift my left leg to do the clutch.
billsfan89 Posted September 29, 2015 Posted September 29, 2015 If Miller is 100% keep him in there, the starting unit needs to grow and Miller will only stand to improve. I think Miller's play from my uneducated eye has been decent and when Urbik stepped in he looked solid. I say with Miller sit him if he needs a week off, Urbik looks like he could fill in for a game.
Bocephuz Posted September 29, 2015 Posted September 29, 2015 We'll get an idea after Bocephuz posts his OL review. Try to get the OL review up tomorrow.. From naked eye Miller was doing fine and then poof he was gone and Urbik stepped in and didn't miss a beat I must admit I was so fired up with how things were going I missed a lot of detail so All 22 review will be interesting tomorrow
Taro T Posted September 29, 2015 Posted September 29, 2015 No, old episodes of "Cheers." The name of the sports segment on "Channel 13 News" that Sam covered for his buddy was "I on Sports." So, yes, you were.
Doc Posted September 29, 2015 Posted September 29, 2015 The name of the sports segment on "Channel 13 News" that Sam covered for his buddy was "I on Sports." So, yes, you were. My bad. Shoulda looked it up.
Recommended Posts