Agent 91 Posted September 19, 2015 Posted September 19, 2015 (edited) Just an honest question. What about that matchup leads people to believe that this is the ideal pairing. Wouldnt it be better to put Lawson who has proven that he can stay with smaller faster guys while nullifying Gronkowskis length and coming in a mere 20-25 pounds lighter. I think a second option would be Bradham. I just dont think I like the idea of safeties and certainly cbs matched up with the big guy. Any ideas would be greatly welcomed. Edited September 19, 2015 by Agent 91
BuffaloBill Posted September 19, 2015 Posted September 19, 2015 The Bills will mix up coverages on Gronk. This has been Rex's pattern. The primary question is who covers him in the red zone?
thebandit27 Posted September 19, 2015 Posted September 19, 2015 The Bills will mix up coverages on Gronk. This has been Rex's pattern. The primary question is who covers him in the red zone? Straight double; no disguise. Lawson + Graham Most likely means that NE**** will run the ball, as they typically like to do, but that's fine with me.
YoloinOhio Posted September 19, 2015 Posted September 19, 2015 Straight double; no disguise. Lawson + Graham Most likely means that NE**** will run the ball, as they typically like to do, but that's fine with me. i assume they will have Chandler out there at the same time in the red zone... What do you do with both?
Greybeard Posted September 19, 2015 Posted September 19, 2015 The Patriot's use a Tight End cloaking device. The reason it is so effective is it only works on Defensive players. Everyone one else can see them. I think Gilmore is unaware of this. This conclusion was developed in the late 90's when Ben Coates went consistantly uncovered during Bill's games. NE has a tendency to over use it when they are close to the goal line.
NoSaint Posted September 19, 2015 Posted September 19, 2015 (edited) Gilmore is big, physical, and corners tend to really do well on tight ends despite fans fearing the size issue. I recall in the jimmy graham tag discussion that when covered by a corner his targets dropped, when targeted his catch percentage dropped 5-10% (or something similar), his ypc dropped. He essentially went from elite passing stats against anyone but a corner to his comp being like the 63rd best receiving threat against a CB. (63 being made up but it was in that bad 2 to good 3 range, if I recall) Part of the "you don't pay a tight end like a wr" argument was that their numbers go down pretty noticeably if a defense ever commits to using a corner on them while a Dez or Johnson or... puts up those top numbers against the top pass defender. In the graham data it was even small corners like grimes that did fine against him. I wouldn't do it alllll day but in multiple TE sets, sure thing I am. Edited September 19, 2015 by NoSaint
Hapless Bills Fan Posted September 19, 2015 Posted September 19, 2015 i assume they will have Chandler out there at the same time in the red zone... What do you do with both? If the Bills force the Pats into going to Chandler and Amandola, that would be a step. They can play, but they're ordinary good players, not the breakout/YAC monsters that Gronk and Edelman are.
YoloinOhio Posted September 19, 2015 Posted September 19, 2015 If the Bills force the Pats into going to Chandler and Amandola, that would be a step. They can play, but they're ordinary good players, not the breakout/YAC monsters that Gronk and Edelman are. true, I'm thinking more of right there in the end zone with Chandler. Like last week he had the 1yd TD.
NoSaint Posted September 19, 2015 Posted September 19, 2015 If the Bills force the Pats into going to Chandler and Amandola, that would be a step. They can play, but they're ordinary good players, not the breakout/YAC monsters that Gronk and Edelman are. Yea - manny against chandler, Darby/Robey against Edelman/amendola and Gilmore picking up gronk is my ideal. In a 2 TE 2 wr set.
thebandit27 Posted September 19, 2015 Posted September 19, 2015 i assume they will have Chandler out there at the same time in the red zone... What do you do with both? In the RZ, I have no problem playing Aaron on Chandler. If Brady**** has enough time to throw a jump ball to ScoChan, something's wrong. Yea - manny against chandler, Darby/Robey against Edelman/amendola and Gilmore picking up gronk is my ideal. In a 2 TE 2 wr set. My only worry there is that NE**** will run the ball to the edge, where Gronk will be able to seal against Gilmore
NoSaint Posted September 19, 2015 Posted September 19, 2015 In the RZ, I have no problem playing Aaron on Chandler. If Brady**** has enough time to throw a jump ball to ScoChan, something's wrong. My only worry there is that NE**** will run the ball to the edge, where Gronk will be able to seal against Gilmore To the first part, I'm pretty sure chandlers feet never leave the ground when he jumps, so we have that going for us. To the second, obviously down, distance and formation all play a role but we do have safety and linebacker help running in that setup, and our line should help disrupt the running game too.
GunnerBill Posted September 19, 2015 Posted September 19, 2015 Because Gilmore is our best physical pass defender and Gronkowski is their game breaking weapon that I want to take away. Belichick did it very effectively using Talib on Jimmy Graham and that is kind of the template for what I would do.
NoSaint Posted September 19, 2015 Posted September 19, 2015 Because Gilmore is our best physical pass defender and Gronkowski is their game breaking weapon that I want to take away. Belichick did it very effectively using Talib on Jimmy Graham and that is kind of the template for what I would do. It wasn't even just talib- several teams went that way and graham struggled.
PO16FFS Posted September 19, 2015 Posted September 19, 2015 Physical? Since when did holding jerseys and avoiding tackles become physical? Rose coloured glasses for sure. Gilmore is in year 4. He is there, making the plays that are asked of him. Nothing more, nothing less.
BuffalothruMyVeins Posted September 19, 2015 Posted September 19, 2015 i assume they will have Chandler out there at the same time in the red zone... What do you do with both? Put Kong on him.
CNY315 Posted September 19, 2015 Posted September 19, 2015 Physical? Since when did holding jerseys and avoiding tackles become physical? Rose coloured glasses for sure. Gilmore is in year 4. He is there, making the plays that are asked of him. Nothing more, nothing less. You can't be talking about Gilmore
PO16FFS Posted September 19, 2015 Posted September 19, 2015 Have you watched his first 3 years? Again, he is there doing his job. He gets beat sometimes and breaks up plays the other times. Im not knocking him. Its just funny to see the rose coloured glasses. Save this thread please. He will not make a probowl. If so, I will eat crow. Gilmore getting schooled by Watkins:
Deranged Rhino Posted September 19, 2015 Posted September 19, 2015 Physical? Since when did holding jerseys and avoiding tackles become physical? Rose coloured glasses for sure. Gilmore is in year 4. He is there, making the plays that are asked of him. Nothing more, nothing less. You clearly didn't watch the last quarter of the '14 season where Gilmore was arguably a top 3 CB in the NFL. And his performance against the Colts was outstanding, all pro type performance. To say so isn't wearing rose colored glasses, it's just reality.
JM57 Posted September 19, 2015 Posted September 19, 2015 (edited) I want to thank Fredex22 for voicing his opinion on Gilmore here. I'll add him to the list. What list you ask? The list of posters here who are fans of the game but clearly don't know the game very well. Because anyone that knows football well knows Gilmore is a very good talent. Edited September 19, 2015 by JM57
CNY315 Posted September 19, 2015 Posted September 19, 2015 (edited) Then uses practice to make his case lol. Ive never seen Gilmore avoid making a tackle. That's one of my favorite things about him. He will come up and tag someone in run support Edited September 19, 2015 by CNY315
Recommended Posts