Bill from NYC Posted September 5, 2015 Posted September 5, 2015 Why does this thread exist? What difference does it make if TG is full of crap? Is there really a need to play Sir Walter Raleigh? Should we put our cloaks across a puddle for Whaley to cross? Is he a damsel in distress? I look at Whaley and see an aggressive GM. He used 2 number 1 draft choices on a receiver and signed a running qb who is now the starter. This may or may not work. Meanwhile, he has earned millions of dollars. As far as I'm concerned he can fend for himself. If the Bills lose he will be canned. If they win, who's better than him? Was this a "rogue" move? Maybe, maybe not. What I can tell you is that if you go to divorce court tomorrow and lose a half a million dollars, Whaley won't be bursting into the court room defending your honor. End of rant.
Rico Posted September 5, 2015 Posted September 5, 2015 Why does this thread exist? What difference does it make if TG is full of crap? Is there really a need to play Sir Walter Raleigh? Should we put our cloaks across a puddle for Whaley to cross? Is he a damsel in distress? I look at Whaley and see an aggressive GM. He used 2 number 1 draft choices on a receiver and signed a running qb who is now the starter. This may or may not work. Meanwhile, he has earned millions of dollars. As far as I'm concerned he can fend for himself. If the Bills lose he will be canned. If they win, who's better than him? Was this a "rogue" move? Maybe, maybe not. What I can tell you is that if you go to divorce court tomorrow and lose a half a million dollars, Whaley won't be bursting into the court room defending your honor. End of rant. For the record, I only clicked on this thread cause I saw Bill had the last post.
Acantha Posted September 5, 2015 Posted September 5, 2015 Why does this thread exist? What difference does it make if TG is full of crap? Is there really a need to play Sir Walter Raleigh? Should we put our cloaks across a puddle for Whaley to cross? Is he a damsel in distress? I look at Whaley and see an aggressive GM. He used 2 number 1 draft choices on a receiver and signed a running qb who is now the starter. This may or may not work. Meanwhile, he has earned millions of dollars. As far as I'm concerned he can fend for himself. If the Bills lose he will be canned. If they win, who's better than him? Was this a "rogue" move? Maybe, maybe not. What I can tell you is that if you go to divorce court tomorrow and lose a half a million dollars, Whaley won't be bursting into the court room defending your honor. End of rant. There is almost nothing in this thread about defending Whaley.
Lurker Posted September 5, 2015 Posted September 5, 2015 There is almost nothing in this thread about defending Whaley. Yeah, complete misreading of the situation...
Momma Pecoraro Posted September 5, 2015 Posted September 5, 2015 #BADOL - thanks for the unwarranted shots at my intelligence and ability to participate in educated conversation. You must be one heluva guy. I'm really sorry we have had differing opinions on stupid sports related topics over the years. My beef with Tim Graham is not about his writing, it's about how he treats people - which to me is indicative of character. Too bad you don't see the difference. Have a great day and go Bills. You were b!tchslapped yet still maintain civility - kudos to you.
Nervous Guy Posted September 5, 2015 Posted September 5, 2015 Why does this thread exist? What difference does it make if TG is full of crap? Is there really a need to play Sir Walter Raleigh? Should we put our cloaks across a puddle for Whaley to cross? Is he a damsel in distress? I look at Whaley and see an aggressive GM. He used 2 number 1 draft choices on a receiver and signed a running qb who is now the starter. This may or may not work. Meanwhile, he has earned millions of dollars. As far as I'm concerned he can fend for himself. If the Bills lose he will be canned. If they win, who's better than him? Was this a "rogue" move? Maybe, maybe not. What I can tell you is that if you go to divorce court tomorrow and lose a half a million dollars, Whaley won't be bursting into the court room defending your honor. End of rant. While I agree with your assessment, I take umbrage on one point...that statement about Sir Walter Raleigh is a complete myth.
Rico Posted September 5, 2015 Posted September 5, 2015 You were b!tchslapped yet still maintain civility - kudos to you. Indeed, most honorable. Genteel even.
Nervous Guy Posted September 5, 2015 Posted September 5, 2015 Indeed, most honorable. Genteel even. Like Sir Walter Raleigh?
Rico Posted September 5, 2015 Posted September 5, 2015 Like Sir Walter Raleigh? I wouldn't go that far. Maybe like Colonel Sanders.
Nervous Guy Posted September 5, 2015 Posted September 5, 2015 I wouldn't go that far. Maybe like Colonel Sanders. interesting...Sanders was notoriously licentious...a bit of a rogue.
DC Tom Posted September 5, 2015 Posted September 5, 2015 interesting...Sanders was notoriously licentious...a bit of a rogue. He rode his hoes?
Kelly the Dog Posted September 5, 2015 Posted September 5, 2015 He rode his hoes? Why even have hoes if you are not going to ride them? I guess you could rent them out.
Beerball Posted September 5, 2015 Posted September 5, 2015 You want a real pillow fight? West Point knows how to have a pillow fight.
DC Tom Posted September 5, 2015 Posted September 5, 2015 You want a real pillow fight? West Point knows how to have a pillow fight. Yes, but I believe Graham has already blocked the Academy on Twitter.
Lurker Posted September 5, 2015 Posted September 5, 2015 You want a real pillow fight? West Point knows how to have a pillow fight. Yikes! "If you don't come back with a bloody nose, you didn't try hard enough..."
Solomon Grundy Posted September 5, 2015 Posted September 5, 2015 Get em Tim!! That's what he gets for disrespecting EJ Manuel!! As the Rock would say "KNOW YOUR ROLE"!!
bbb Posted September 5, 2015 Posted September 5, 2015 Get em Tim!! That's what he gets for disrespecting EJ Manuel!! As the Rock would say "KNOW YOUR ROLE"!! As, Colonel Sanders would say - know your roll
Hapless Bills Fan Posted September 5, 2015 Posted September 5, 2015 But isn't that the whole issue with graham's account? His sources insist that Whaley acted outside normal operating protocol. Just because Whaley ran the cut by Pegula doesn't mean he didn't bypassother channels that are usually in the loop. That's why I think the Kryk article is spot on. Dashed line reporting responsibilities only work in well established organizations where there are clear lines of communication and accountability. They rarely work where the fiefdoms vie for control. OK, I read the Kryk article but I must have missed it. What "dashed line" reporting responsibilities did Kryk identify that were bypassed? I thought the Brandon did a nice job of laying out roles and responsibilities during the 14 Jan introductory presser. Whaley is GM and is responsible for the 53 man roster. Rex is responsible for the game day roster. Brandon is responsible for football ops. All report to the Pegulas. Basically what I read Kryk as advocating was the hiring of a football czar to whom all 3 would report - which essentially sounds to me like handing off responsibility from the Pegulas to Mr Czar, whomever he might be.
LB3 Posted September 5, 2015 Posted September 5, 2015 As, Colonel Sanders would say - know your roll you. Now I want to go to that awful place!
Nervous Guy Posted September 5, 2015 Posted September 5, 2015 As, Colonel Sanders would say - know your roll that's a biscuit.
Recommended Posts