Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Pretty sure this is the way Goodell wanted it. He looks like he tried his damnedest to punish New England while knowing it was too off-the-wall to ever come across as legit in a court of law.

 

I never thought of that angle but it makes sense. He and Kraft are slimy.

 

The saddest part is these federal court proceedings are all taxpayer money getting burned up for ridiculous crap like this. Hey NFL, look like you'll have to change yet ANOTHER rule after the Patriots exploited a loophole again.

 

This time you work with the players union to develop a simple arbitration committee WITHIN the NFL and have their word be final on all suspension issues handed down from the commish. Have all players sign an agreement (or they don't play) that clearly states that no dispute will be escalated past this committee and their word is final and KEEP THESE FREAKIN' ISSUES OUT OF THE FEDERAL COURTS FOR THE LOVE OF GOD you smug, whiny little weenies. It's embarrassing.

 

You can appeal the commish's decision, you have one day to make your case to the committee and the league has one day to make theirs. One day for cross and a decision is reached by majority on day 4. End of problem, end of needed a federal court to settle your business because you can't seem to put a system in place that works.

 

Ok I'm done. We're on to Indianapolis now...

  • Replies 504
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted (edited)

how "generally aware" rises to a 4 game suspension, when the punishment for underinflation according to the CBA is a $25,000 fine, is laughable.

 

goodell and the NFL overstepped their authority.

It's not. It's "no less than $25,000" and can be anything they want it to be.

 

That's maximum specified punishment a CLUB may impose on a PLAYER for tampering with club equipment. That has exactly nothing to do with this case - Brady wasn't suspended by the Pats for tampering with the Pats' equipment.

 

Really...read the friggin' CBA, or shut the !@#$ up people. It's not that tough a read.

I think it's the minimum. I think it's no less than $25k

 

EDIT: The wording from the game manual is "including, but not limited to, a fine of $25,000" for ball tampering.

 

The NFL’s game operations manual that is distributed annually to teams has a starting point for a penalty for ball tampering, but not an end point:

“The person responsible, and, if appropriate, the head coach or other club personnel will be subject to discipline, including but not limited to, a fine of $25,000.”

Edited by Kelly the Dog
Posted

@Rachel__Nichols: NFL will appeal but confirms it won't seek a stay to keep Brady off the field while doing so. So: Brady plays, and #Deflategate never dies.

I'm glad the league is standing on principle with their appeal. I'm also glad they aren't seeking an injunction against Brady in the meantime. This issue is bigger than Brady.

 

GO BILLS!!!

 

@SiriusXMNFL: Polian: It's always possible that he could serve a suspension in Dec/Jan if the 2nd circuit overturns this ruling but process moves slow.

No way this gets resolved in that short a time frame. The Peterson appeal is STILL pending.

 

GO BILLS!!!

Posted

Mario should have a ballboy steal all the balls before the Pats game and stick a tiny chip in them, then Mario could employ and hide a sharpshooter at the Ralph with an air rifle, and every pass that Brady throws over ten yards the sniper will just shoot it out of the sky with help from the GPS chip. They really can't fault Mario or punish him for it because they didn't ever establish that there is a punishment for hiring snipers to blow the balls out of the sky before.

 

This may be one of the greatest things I've ever read

Posted (edited)

 

Except that he doesn't launch himself (if you go through it frame-by-frame, his feet never leave the ground), he doesn't lead with the helmet, he doesn't seem to go headhunting (even frame-by-frame it's hard to tell). But he'd still get the flag, suspension, and fine anyway, nowadays.

 

Hell, a full third of Bruce's sacks would result in penalties and fines nowadays. And Leon Seals' pancaking of Hostetler in the Superbowl doesn't even bear thinking about.

 

I've seen that clip a bunch and this thought never crossed my mind, but I think you are right on the flag, maybe a 2 game suspension, and at least 50k fine. If you slow that clip down, he doesn't "launch" himself, and it looks like the hit is with his shoulder. But 1) its TB12, 2) Helmet comes off means the NFL wets themselves and does everything to protect Brady in the future.

 

Looks like a sweet hit to me. Worth the penalties all day long.

Yeah that's what I said. I did slow it down frame by frame. And as I stated - He doesn't launch himself. Its clean. With that said, I think it would be a fine. I dont agree with it, but its the outcome I would expect.

Edited by PortlandiaEast
Posted

Mario should have a ballboy steal all the balls before the Pats game and stick a tiny chip in them, then Mario could employ and hide a sharpshooter at the Ralph with an air rifle, and every pass that Brady throws over ten yards the sniper will just shoot it out of the sky with help from the GPS chip. They really can't fault Mario or punish him for it because they didn't ever establish that there is a punishment for hiring snipers to blow the balls out of the sky before.

 

 

i think that would result in a 15 yard penalty on Jerry Hughes
Posted (edited)

 

Roger needs to let it go. As a taxpayer I am a bit pissed off about anymore tax dollars being used to litigate a soft football.

Agreed, but at this point in the case, the courts are deciding on whether or not the NFL & NFLPA has to comply to the agreed upon procedure or not. The NFLPA (union) agreed to give the commissioner(management) authority and are now saying they dont like it. Its a labor relations matter more than anything and it may have a precedent reaching to other industries.

Edited by PortlandiaEast
Posted

This whole argument that he did not know what the punishment would be is nonsense. Why did he have the 2 idiots do it if he did not know that some punishment would be handed out. Why did he destroy his phone. Why not just do it on the sidelines in plain view. This judge should be impeached for wading into a labor issue he has not business being involved in the. The parties agreed to the CBA.

There is jurisprudence in Labor Law that either party cannot gain in arbitration what they could not negotiate at the bargaining table. This decision violates that law.

Posted

Being that NE's first road game will be in Buffalo we need a roaring "CHEEEATTTER" chant going. I just can't decide when they take the field or first time the Cheats get the ball.

Posted

League probably should lock out players and tear up CBA to make it stronger, as obviously they don't seem to be able to do the things the agreement says they are able to do, like punish the players.

Posted

@MikeGarafolo: Roger Goodell will not attend next Thursday's NFL opener in Foxboro, NFL confirmed. Believes the focus should be on game/festivities.

Can you imagine how much coverage this is going to get on opening night = sickening. Everything about this just sucks.

Posted

@MikeGarafolo: Roger Goodell will not attend next Thursday's NFL opener in Foxboro, NFL confirmed. Believes the focus should be on game/festivities.

As long as he makes a note for the Refs to be "on the lookout" for any violation whatsoever.

Posted

I have ZERO plans for watching that game.

I was psyched up for it...couldn't wait......now......meh.......

 

You know that one of those friggin sideline reporters is going to try to go ask Brady about it. And he will make some smug remark... I'd like to crap in his clam chowder.

×
×
  • Create New...