RVJ Posted February 13, 2005 Share Posted February 13, 2005 Thats a tough call....Ill take a Rock Star. I bet more choose football. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fezmid Posted February 13, 2005 Share Posted February 13, 2005 Thats a tough call....Ill take a Rock Star. I bet more choose football. 237295[/snapback] Tough call. I picked rock star, only because you still have your health when you're done... Assuming you don't drink and drug it up. CW Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted February 13, 2005 Share Posted February 13, 2005 Rock stars have a longer shelf life and more chicks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CircleTheWagons Posted February 13, 2005 Share Posted February 13, 2005 Tough call. I picked rock star, only because you still have your health when you're done... Assuming you don't drink and drug it up. CW 237305[/snapback] Thats like saying Football Player... Assuming I don't get hit or have to tackle Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Astrobot Posted February 13, 2005 Share Posted February 13, 2005 Porn Star's not a choice? I'll take Rock Star, but all three would be short-lived careers! You'd spend your 40's through 80's in a trailer down by the river. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gobilz Posted February 13, 2005 Share Posted February 13, 2005 Thats like saying Football Player... Assuming I don't get hit or have to tackle 237349[/snapback] Dieon Sanders? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BB27 Posted February 13, 2005 Share Posted February 13, 2005 I would take neither if it was available. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fezmid Posted February 13, 2005 Share Posted February 13, 2005 Thats like saying Football Player... Assuming I don't get hit or have to tackle 237349[/snapback] Contrary to the stereotype, there's no reason that you HAVE to drink or use drugs if you're a rock star. That's a choice to make. On the other hand, you wouldn't be much of a football player if you weren't being hit or doing the hitting. CW Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bear Posted February 13, 2005 Share Posted February 13, 2005 Contrary to the stereotype, there's no reason that you HAVE to drink or use drugs if you're a rock star. That's a choice to make. On the other hand, you wouldn't be much of a football player if you weren't being hit or doing the hitting. CW 237447[/snapback] Kicker? May not make as much money, but half a mil to a million a year aint bad, and all they have to do is kick a few times a game. Hell, they don't even have to be good at it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ralonzo Posted February 13, 2005 Share Posted February 13, 2005 100% Rock Star. You get just as much punani in either profession, but compare the quality of life at age 60 between, say, Mick Jagger and Jim Otto. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gmac17 Posted February 13, 2005 Share Posted February 13, 2005 100% Rock Star. You get just as much punani in either profession Rock stars get far and away the most tail of anyone on earth - more than movie stars, sports stars or anyone else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BF_in_Indiana Posted February 13, 2005 Share Posted February 13, 2005 Assuming you don't drink and drug it up. 237305[/snapback] That's WHY I chose Rock Star!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts