Green Lightning Posted August 31, 2015 Posted August 31, 2015 Um, the younger guys are better for the future of our team?
Uffalo Ills Posted August 31, 2015 Posted August 31, 2015 Fred was cut because he was expensive and there was no upside. That said I think it was the wrong move because even though he lacked upside and he hit his ceiling long ago, he was a damn good player and he proved his worth yesterday. He looked awesome on that run. Next they're gonna cut Easley even though he had a monster day by this logic. Smh gonna miss my favorite bill.
Buffaloed in Pa Posted August 31, 2015 Posted August 31, 2015 13 fumbles in the last 3 seasons. That's a lot. http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/J/JackFr02.htm I said this before...got blasted for it. A lot more than Bryce. A lot.
FireChan Posted August 31, 2015 Posted August 31, 2015 (edited) I said this before...got blasted for it. A lot more than Bryce. A lot. Bryce never plays. Because he sucks AND fumbles. Edited August 31, 2015 by FireChan
Tenhigh Posted August 31, 2015 Posted August 31, 2015 13 fumbles in the last 3 seasons. That's a lot. http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/J/JackFr02.htm But how many lost?
Captain Caveman Posted August 31, 2015 Posted August 31, 2015 Special teams, special teams and special teamsThis makes a ton of sense. As a side note, I've been watching hard knocks for the past 5 years or so and I don't remember a GM ever making this decision (he has a place at the table.) Seems much more likely that the coaches felt the need to move on.
negativo Posted August 31, 2015 Author Posted August 31, 2015 Um, the younger guys are better for the future of our team? Um, not the ones who suck.
Tyrod's Tailor Posted August 31, 2015 Posted August 31, 2015 But how many lost? not many. but IMO the fact that the Bills usually recovered is beside the point.
Over 29 years of fanhood Posted August 31, 2015 Posted August 31, 2015 I believe the decision to cut Freddy was Whaley's attempt to save face on his failed trade for Bryce Brown. I believe Whaley's ego got in the way of the best interests of the football team. I say Rex signed off on it because he had bigger fish to fry than backup RB, most notably starting the QB he brought in over Whaley's top pick EJ Manuel. It was a trade of sorts. Whaley gave up EJ, Rex caved on Freddy, and then they both made nice with Papa Terry. It is what it is, but the decision letting Freddy go to keep Bryce was an awful, pig-headed one. C'mon man- Whaley just wants to win. They've taken swings and have moved on from several moves that didn't pan out. There are still 2 or 3 rbs to be cut still
Cash Posted August 31, 2015 Posted August 31, 2015 Doesn't mean I'm happy about it, but I don't think it was a move to save face. I think the FO ultimately went with a younger & cheaper player in Brown over Fred. OR it's possible that neither Brown nor Fred makes the team, and they decided to release Fred first out of respect for him - i.e., he has a better chance of catching on elsewhere now vs. in the last cuts.
dave mcbride Posted August 31, 2015 Posted August 31, 2015 (edited) 13 fumbles in the last 3 seasons. That's a lot. http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/J/JackFr02.htm It is. Some comparisons: last three seasons: Fred Jackson: 13 fumbles on 659 touches DeMarco Murray: 12 fumbles on 914 touches LeSean McCoy: 9 fumbles on 960 touches Arian Foster: 5 fumbles on 832 touches Marshawn Lynch: 13 fumbles on 992 touches Matt Forte: 6 fumbles on 1,023 touches Frank Gore: 8 fumbles on 844 touches La'Veon Bell (two seasons only): 1 fumble on 662 touches (3 more touches than Fred's 659) Edited August 31, 2015 by dave mcbride
The Big Cat Posted August 31, 2015 Posted August 31, 2015 This nonsense about Brown HAS to stop. They traded for/drafted a RB in the offseason. This notion that Brown is somehow a Whaley pet project needs to go away.
Tenhigh Posted August 31, 2015 Posted August 31, 2015 I said this before...got blasted for it. A lot more than Bryce. A lot. If you look at it in terms of fumbles lost per attempt (turnovers), it tells a different story.
dave mcbride Posted August 31, 2015 Posted August 31, 2015 But how many lost? Whether they're lost or not is a matter of luck.
negativo Posted August 31, 2015 Author Posted August 31, 2015 It's nearly impossible to believe that Whaley trading for Brown had nothing to do with healthy Freddy being cut and injured, fumbling, soft, lost Brown being kept. Considering Rex has done nothing but bash Brown and say positive things about Freddy, it doesn't require a tinfoil hat to do the math here.
dave mcbride Posted August 31, 2015 Posted August 31, 2015 Bryce never plays. Because he sucks AND fumbles. 5 fumbles on 263 touches. That's 1.90 percent of the time. Fred has fumbled at a rate of 1.97 percent of the time the past three seasons.
Tenhigh Posted August 31, 2015 Posted August 31, 2015 Whether they're lost or not is a matter of luck. Not necessarily, there's something to be said for picking up your own fumble. But at the end of the day, I understand and agree with the decision. I just don't like to see the fans on here already besmirching Fredex because he was cut. It's ok to not dump on a guy that is no longer with the team.
Heitz Posted August 31, 2015 Posted August 31, 2015 Um, the younger guys are better for the future of our team? Too simple, the real answer is that they cut him JUST to anger fans As has been said in about a million threads - it sucks. I LOVE Freddy. I bought his jersey last year. I've been saying for (far too many) years that the guy is the heart of the team. But this is the NFL, you don't win by keep fan favorite, old players. Sucks, but hey, so does life sometimes...
DrDawkinstein Posted August 31, 2015 Posted August 31, 2015 It's nearly impossible to believe that Whaley trading for Brown had nothing to do with healthy Freddy being cut and injured, fumbling, soft, lost Brown being kept. Considering Rex has done nothing but bash Brown and say positive things about Freddy, it doesn't require a tinfoil hat to do the math here. I cant believe I keep responding to your lunacy, but its a boring Monday. You do realize Freddy has been injured more, and has fumbled more, than Brown, right?
Maddog69 Posted August 31, 2015 Posted August 31, 2015 It's nearly impossible to believe that Whaley trading for Brown had nothing to do with healthy Freddy being cut and injured, fumbling, soft, lost Brown being kept. Considering Rex has done nothing but bash Brown and say positive things about Freddy, it doesn't require a tinfoil hat to do the math here. So Whalley cut Freddy and kept Brown even through Rex likes Freddy and not Brown? Not buying it. Freddy was as good as gone when Rex was hired. Not sure why. But it was reported he was on the outs almost immediately. The Pegulas stepped in and asked Rex to keep Freddy and give him a chance in camp.
Recommended Posts