negativo Posted August 31, 2015 Posted August 31, 2015 (edited) I believe the decision to cut Freddy was Whaley's attempt to save face on his failed trade for Bryce Brown. I believe Whaley's ego got in the way of the best interests of the football team. I say Rex signed off on it because he had bigger fish to fry than backup RB, most notably starting the QB he brought in over Whaley's top pick EJ Manuel. It was a trade of sorts. Whaley gave up EJ, Rex caved on Freddy, and then they both made nice with Papa Terry. It is what it is, but the decision letting Freddy go to keep Bryce was an awful, pig-headed one. Edited August 31, 2015 by negativo
QB Bills Posted August 31, 2015 Posted August 31, 2015 Doesn't have to do with saving face. That just makes no sense. Add an option for awful talent evaluation by the FO and that would get my vote.
CNY315 Posted August 31, 2015 Posted August 31, 2015 (edited) He's old Edited August 31, 2015 by CNY315
DDD Posted August 31, 2015 Posted August 31, 2015 He obviously could not perform for the new coaching regime. I think he's still got a little juice left in the tank. Why do I sense Bill Bellichek will be calling him?
prissythecat Posted August 31, 2015 Posted August 31, 2015 Old and slow. Has nothing to do with the Bryce Brown trade.
BuffaloHokie13 Posted August 31, 2015 Posted August 31, 2015 combination of age, salary, and available talent on the roster
DrDawkinstein Posted August 31, 2015 Posted August 31, 2015 Need another option for this poll: "Old, often injured, fumbles, expensive #4, and it's time to move on"
FireChan Posted August 31, 2015 Posted August 31, 2015 Objectively, Fred was the second best RB on the roster, so I don't really get it.
Maury Ballstein Posted August 31, 2015 Posted August 31, 2015 Other. Ej Manuel requested it just to piss you off.
H2o Posted August 31, 2015 Posted August 31, 2015 I love Fred and wish he could have retired as a Bills player, but he has been often injured the last two or three years and he has lost a step. Really wuish they would have kept him, but I understand why they did not.
klos63 Posted August 31, 2015 Posted August 31, 2015 He obviously could not perform for the new coaching regime. I think he's still got a little juice left in the tank. Why do I sense Bill Bellichek will be calling him? Belichek is also know for being pretty ruthless when it comes to releasing star players a year too soon as opposed to a year too late, but if he does sign Jackson, it won't be for $2.5 million.
....lybob Posted August 31, 2015 Posted August 31, 2015 Before free agency and the salary cap there was at least a little room in the NFL for sentimentality now there is none.
Maddog69 Posted August 31, 2015 Posted August 31, 2015 I believe there is more to it. I think Freddy is a vocal guy in the locker room and if the coaches were planning on reducing Fred's role and making him a third stringer, I'm sure that would not have gone over well with Fred and he would have been vocal about that displeasure. Fred has been a strong voice over a very bad period of football for the Bills. It's possible he became too comfortable with losing. Whatever it was, I just don't think Rex wanted him around. It was rumored that Fred's days were numbered as soon as Rex was hired.
Imran Q Posted August 31, 2015 Posted August 31, 2015 I believe there is more to it. I think Freddy is a vocal guy in the locker room and if the coaches were planning on reducing Fred's role and making him a third stringer, I'm sure that would not have gone over well with Fred and he would have been vocal about that displeasure. Fred has been a strong voice over a very bad period of football for the Bills. It's possible he became too comfortable with losing. Whatever it was, I just don't think Rex wanted him around. It was rumored that Fred's days were numbered as soon as Rex was hired. So my take home message from this post is: 1. Fred comfortable with losing 2. Fred would be a bad locker room presence. Can I nominate this for most ridiculous (dumbest) post of the he day?
bigK14094 Posted August 31, 2015 Posted August 31, 2015 He's old and slow.....thats the real reason. Saturday's 40 yard run was the slowest in NFL history....he got run down from behind.
BackInDaDay Posted August 31, 2015 Posted August 31, 2015 I believe there is more to it. I think Freddy is a vocal guy in the locker room and if the coaches were planning on reducing Fred's role and making him a third stringer, I'm sure that would not have gone over well with Fred and he would have been vocal about that displeasure. Fred has been a strong voice over a very bad period of football for the Bills. It's possible he became too comfortable with losing. Whatever it was, I just don't think Rex wanted him around. It was rumored that Fred's days were numbered as soon as Rex was hired. Fred Jackson - locker room cancer..
BuffaloBaumer Posted August 31, 2015 Posted August 31, 2015 Special teams, special teams and special teams
Mr. WEO Posted August 31, 2015 Posted August 31, 2015 Beerball will spill blood on these Freddy threads soon!
MDH Posted August 31, 2015 Posted August 31, 2015 Age and cash. The other guys were younger, less expensive and play special teams. I think it was a bad move as nobody is going to replace his pass blocking, overall usefulness and leadership. People keep mentioning his speed, who cares? He was never a speed guy yet he always managed to find holes and fall forward for gains. Every team could use a guy like that, even at his age.
Recommended Posts