NoSaint Posted August 25, 2015 Posted August 25, 2015 Pats would pick Hogan up ---he would be slot for them and put up huge numbers i said it in the other thread, but if hogan and chandler are putting up numbers for NE i like our odds.
San-O Posted August 25, 2015 Posted August 25, 2015 (edited) Hogan isn't great obviously, but he does show some production, has a pretty high target/catch ratio, and few drops. He isn't going to break anything long, but this being his 3rd season, and with possibly am accurate short range QB like Cassel, might be a good move to keep. Hasn't missed a game in 2 years, and appeared in every game since rookie season, 2 years in. Dependable? Edited August 25, 2015 by San-O
boyst Posted August 25, 2015 Posted August 25, 2015 Pats would pick Hogan up ---he would be slot for them and put up huge numbers they need a WR, but i think hogan would end up getting paid better in miami.
eball Posted August 25, 2015 Posted August 25, 2015 Pats would pick Hogan up ---he would be slot for them and put up huge numbers If the Bills' discards are good enough to be Pats** starters we're going to be a damn good team.
San-O Posted August 25, 2015 Posted August 25, 2015 True, I did too, but he came back and finished the game strong. He's got the "injury prone" label -- I think it's unwarranted personally, but I get where it comes from. This camp he's been healthy and making plays. I'm not sure how anyone watching objectively could argue he's been too injured or hasn't performed well enough to make the team. He has, and he's a lock if he remains healthy for these last two games. Well, he's been on the injury report as many times as he's caught the ball. How is he not injury prone? He also missed much of last season. http://www.foxsports.com/nfl/marquise-goodwin-player-injuries
Deranged Rhino Posted August 25, 2015 Posted August 25, 2015 Well, he's been on the injury report as many times as he's caught the ball. How is he not injury prone? He also missed much of last season. http://www.foxsports.com/nfl/marquise-goodwin-player-injuries Last year is impossible to determine accurately whether he was hurt (he says he wasn't) or if he had been cast off in st. Doug's doughouse. He's been healthy in camp, healthy in preseason games, and has contributed. He's not getting cut.
#34fan Posted August 25, 2015 Posted August 25, 2015 Tobias Palmer, Marcus thigpen, and Chris Hogan can go... Nothing against Hogan. He was adequate.... Better than I thought he'd be... However Thompson and Davis could be outrageously productive... These two can be fashioned into weapons.. Hogan is just Hogan.
JohnnyK Posted August 25, 2015 Posted August 25, 2015 Who ever they cut willing be playing here week 2 so be careful my friends!!!!
Deranged Rhino Posted August 25, 2015 Posted August 25, 2015 Who ever they cut willing be playing here week 2 so be careful my friends!!!! With this defense, that's not a big concern.
enlightener Posted August 25, 2015 Posted August 25, 2015 (edited) Find a clip where he catches the ball... Hogan isn't great obviously, but he does show some production, has a pretty high target/catch ratio, and few drops. He isn't going to break anything long, but this being his 3rd season, and with possibly am accurate short range QB like Cassel, might be a good move to keep. Hasn't missed a game in 2 years, and appeared in every game since rookie season, 2 years in. Dependable? welcome. First year fan? In 2012. He caught plenty. Most tough deep balls.....oh and you mean glass hogwyn? Edited August 25, 2015 by enlightener
BigBuff423 Posted August 25, 2015 Posted August 25, 2015 Deonte Thompson, IMHO...Hogan is a nice player, but since Harvin is on a one year contract, Thompson has the speed and size to be an outside WR to compliment Watkins. I like his versatility and speed over Hogan.
Rocky Landing Posted August 25, 2015 Posted August 25, 2015 (edited) Watkins Woods Harvin Hogan Thompson Goodwin PS: Davis Later Easley I don't think it's unreasonable to think that Easley joins the other good WRs on the bubble. But, I would be very surprised if they cut Easley and Thigpen. I think they keep one or the other, if not both. He's a lock. He's been healthy all camp. I think it's an exaggeration to say he's a lock. I will agree that he has improved his chances this camp. But, too many possibilities to call him a lock. A lot of people (myself included) were calling Hogan a lock, not long ago. I hope Dez Lewis makes the PS. There's no way he could, or should make the 53, but I think he has improved through training camp and could have a high ceiling, and could, in the future, add something we don't currently have-- a tall WR. Edited August 25, 2015 by Rocky Landing
Formerly Allan in MD Posted August 25, 2015 Posted August 25, 2015 Beat me to it... Goodwin is a lock unless he gets hurt these final two weeks. He's not getting cut. Between DT and Hogan I'm not sure. I haven't seen enough of DT and I like Hogan's versatility. If I had to chose today it might be Hogan, but ask me after the game Saturday night. Agree about Goodwin. I don't see Goodwin as a lock at all. He is most certainly on the bubble, and constantly hurt or injured it seems. He looked very good last game, and healthy.
Pete Posted August 25, 2015 Posted August 25, 2015 I like Hogan and root for him, but I would choose Deonte over him. He has elite speed and playmaking ability. Everything I hear about this years Bills is how much speed we have. Speed kills. Sammy, Goodwin, and Deonte is the fastest trio I have ever seen in the NFL. Woods is fast, but his impressive 4.51 is slow in comparison. Add in the playmaking ability of Clay, and our running game- our offense has potential to be top 5
Formerly Allan in MD Posted August 25, 2015 Posted August 25, 2015 Tobias Palmer, Marcus thigpen, and Chris Hogan can go... Nothing against Hogan. He was adequate.... Better than I thought he'd be... However Thompson and Davis could be outrageously productive... These two can be fashioned into weapons.. Hogan is just Hogan. Hogan was better than adequate. I still think Hogan may go on IR. You keep one more of the young guys and have Hogan for next year; he's a proven receiver.
NoSaint Posted August 25, 2015 Posted August 25, 2015 Hogan was better than adequate. I still think Hogan may go on IR. You keep one more of the young guys and have Hogan for next year; he's a proven receiver. again, why is hogan agreeing to go on IR if healthy? no one has explained that part to me yet, and its kind of an important piece.
Deranged Rhino Posted August 25, 2015 Posted August 25, 2015 I don't think it's unreasonable to think that Easley joins the other good WRs on the bubble. But, I would be very surprised if they cut Easley and Thigpen. I think they keep one or the other, if not both. I think it's an exaggeration to say he's a lock. I will agree that he has improved his chances this camp. But, too many possibilities to call him a lock. A lot of people (myself included) were calling Hogan a lock, not long ago. I hope Dez Lewis makes the PS. There's no way he could, or should make the 53, but I think he has improved through training camp and could have a high ceiling, and could, in the future, add something we don't currently have-- a tall WR. Calling Goodwin a lock before camp was an exaggeration. Saying it as camp closes, considering how he's played, is not. He's a lock.
mikef272002 Posted August 25, 2015 Posted August 25, 2015 (edited) Watkins Woods Harvin Hogan Thompson Thigpen - For special teams Davis Practice Squad Goodwin - Gone hopefully, the guy is just hurt way too much.. I like his speed, but that's about it.. Easely - Gone Edited August 25, 2015 by mikef272002
NoSaint Posted August 25, 2015 Posted August 25, 2015 Watkins Woods Harvin Hogan Thompson Thigpen - For special teams Davis Practice Squad Goodwin - Gone hopefully, the guy is just hurt way too much.. I like his speed, but that's about it.. Easely - Gone if hogan, thompson, and thigpen are 4-6 on the depth chart.... i feel like i should make some bold proclamation of something outrageous i would do.... but yea... i would be absolutely shocked.
Recommended Posts