San-O Posted August 25, 2015 Posted August 25, 2015 Thompson? Has 15 career receptions and did not play last year... ?? http://espn.go.com/nfl/player/stats/_/id/15503/deonte-thompson What's the upside here really?
Chandler#81 Posted August 25, 2015 Posted August 25, 2015 DT. Cut the damn cord to our disgusting mediocre past!
NoSaint Posted August 25, 2015 Posted August 25, 2015 There it is again. In Welker's 2 best years he combined for 245 catches and roughly 3,000 yards. In Hogan's career he has 51 for 509 yards. He is VERY reminiscent of Welker in his prime. I know that this will shock some, but I think that it is Hogan for me. p.s. Every time that someone compares Hogan to Welker they should get their posting privileges revoked. They are NOTHING alike. not just welker, but welker IN HIS PRIME! this is one of those spots that i dont mind if they go either way. pick the guy thats healthy, has the chemistry with the qb they choose, and call it a day. id guess hogan, and be fine with it.
mountainwampus Posted August 25, 2015 Posted August 25, 2015 Davis to PS, Hogan and Thompson to other teams. Easley to 5th WR.
The Dean Posted August 25, 2015 Posted August 25, 2015 Davis to PS, Hogan and Thompson to other teams. Easley to 5th WR. Davis might be swiped off the PS as soon as he is put there. I lean toward Hogan here. He has produced. (I keep underestimating how athletic he actually is, as well as his size.) But his drops concern me.
Rockinon Posted August 25, 2015 Posted August 25, 2015 I agree. I think he's the sleeper here. I think we pretty much know what Hogan and Thompson are. I don't dislike Hogan at all but I agree with those who say other guys could actually play the slot better. If Hogan were cut he would be picked up by another team in short order. Thompson has great straightline and even football speed but his hands are definitely suspect. A better comparison by receiver type is Goodwin and Thompson. They are equally fast, neither has great hands, Thompson is bigger and Goodwin is little & brittle. Yep, might be Goodwin who is the odd man out. Incredible how stacked this WR group is.
stony Posted August 25, 2015 Posted August 25, 2015 Yep, might be Goodwin who is the odd man out. Incredible how stacked this WR group is. According to the media, he's a favorite of the WRs coach. He's actually stayed healthy too, which is always the knock on him. I don't see him going anywhere.
eball Posted August 25, 2015 Posted August 25, 2015 There it is again. In Welker's 2 best years he combined for 245 catches and roughly 3,000 yards. In Hogan's career he has 51 for 509 yards. He is VERY reminiscent of Welker in his prime. I know that this will shock some, but I think that it is Hogan for me. p.s. Every time that someone compares Hogan to Welker they should get their posting privileges revoked. They are NOTHING alike. as soon as I saw that comment I was just waiting for the response...
dubs Posted August 25, 2015 Posted August 25, 2015 There it is again. In Welker's 2 best years he combined for 245 catches and roughly 3,000 yards. In Hogan's career he has 51 for 509 yards. He is VERY reminiscent of Welker in his prime. I know that this will shock some, but I think that it is Hogan for me. p.s. Every time that someone compares Hogan to Welker they should get their posting privileges revoked. They are NOTHING alike. Well, they both use SPF 30+???
Deranged Rhino Posted August 25, 2015 Posted August 25, 2015 Hogan hands down - reminiscent of Welker in his prime. Hogan has potential to be a stout slot option who can create his own space and has great hands. Regular season producer > Thompson. Also, with how the injury bug has been travelling around, wouldn't be surprised if we kept 7. More likely 6 though. There it is again. In Welker's 2 best years he combined for 245 catches and roughly 3,000 yards. In Hogan's career he has 51 for 509 yards. He is VERY reminiscent of Welker in his prime. I know that this will shock some, but I think that it is Hogan for me. p.s. Every time that someone compares Hogan to Welker they should get their posting privileges revoked. They are NOTHING alike. Beat me to it... Yep, might be Goodwin who is the odd man out. Incredible how stacked this WR group is. Goodwin is a lock unless he gets hurt these final two weeks. He's not getting cut. Between DT and Hogan I'm not sure. I haven't seen enough of DT and I like Hogan's versatility. If I had to chose today it might be Hogan, but ask me after the game Saturday night.
GG Posted August 25, 2015 Posted August 25, 2015 p.s. Every time that someone compares Hogan to Welker they should get their posting privileges revoked. They are NOTHING alike. They're both underdog white WRs.
YoloinOhio Posted August 25, 2015 Posted August 25, 2015 There it is again. In Welker's 2 best years he combined for 245 catches and roughly 3,000 yards. In Hogan's career he has 51 for 509 yards. He is VERY reminiscent of Welker in his prime. I know that this will shock some, but I think that it is Hogan for me. p.s. Every time that someone compares Hogan to Welker they should get their posting privileges revoked. They are NOTHING alike. not true. I heard Welker bought some Molly in front of a 7-11 once.
GunnerBill Posted August 25, 2015 Posted August 25, 2015 Hogan. Hogan. Hogan. For me Thompson and Goodwin offer me the same and it is one or the other. I might be the biggest Hogan fan on this forum though and the guy who believes his ceiling is higher than others think it is. Hogan is versatile and has proven NFL production. I wouldn't cut him, no way. I also think if Rex Ryan and Doug Whaley were sitting down today and had to get to 53 Hogan makes it. His problem is he has two weeks of potentially watching Thompson and/or Davis make plays. For me Hogan vs Davis in what they offer is a better comparison. Thompson and Goodwin are speedsters and to keep them both would restrict our flexibility in my opinion.
enlightener Posted August 25, 2015 Posted August 25, 2015 (edited) I agree. I think he's the sleeper here. I think we pretty much know what Hogan and Thompson are. I don't dislike Hogan at all but I agree with those who say other guys could actually play the slot better. If Hogan were cut he would be picked up by another team in short order. Thompson has great straightline and even football speed but his hands are definitely suspect. A better comparison by receiver type is Goodwin and Thompson. They are equally fast, neither has great hands, Thompson is bigger and Goodwin is little & brittle.find a clip in a regular season game where Goodwin drops a ball...there are none. Goodwin is faster too....yes brittle...but better Edited August 25, 2015 by enlightener
fansince88 Posted August 25, 2015 Posted August 25, 2015 Dump tin can Harvin and the problem is solved. He is hurt already. All being named in this conversation are better than Harvin.
GunnerBill Posted August 25, 2015 Posted August 25, 2015 Dump tin can Harvin and the problem is solved. He is hurt already. All being named in this conversation are better than Harvin. I'd have never signed go-go gadget man in the first place - except to return kicks.
ALF Posted August 25, 2015 Posted August 25, 2015 Buffalo Bills trade rumors: Deonte Thompson a hot commodity, per Rex Ryan http://www.buffalorumblings.com/bills-news-notes/2015/8/24/9196567/buffalo-bills-trade-rumors-deonte-thompson-rex-ryan
San-O Posted August 25, 2015 Posted August 25, 2015 Beat me to it... Goodwin is a lock unless he gets hurt these final two weeks. He's not getting cut. Between DT and Hogan I'm not sure. I haven't seen enough of DT and I like Hogan's versatility. If I had to chose today it might be Hogan, but ask me after the game Saturday night. I don't see Goodwin as a lock at all. He is most certainly on the bubble, and constantly hurt or injured it seems.
Deranged Rhino Posted August 25, 2015 Posted August 25, 2015 I don't see Goodwin as a lock at all. He is most certainly on the bubble, and constantly hurt or injured it seems. He's a lock. He's been healthy all camp.
YoloinOhio Posted August 25, 2015 Posted August 25, 2015 Dump tin can Harvin and the problem is solved. He is hurt already. All being named in this conversation are better than Harvin.no, they aren't better than Harvin in any universe! Less injury prone, maybe. But so am I and it doesn't make me faster or more explosive.
Recommended Posts