CountDorkula Posted August 24, 2015 Posted August 24, 2015 Green Bay would probably offer a 1st for him. No they would not. NFL players hold little value.
truth on hold Posted August 24, 2015 Author Posted August 24, 2015 No they would not. NFL players hold little value. Why? Woods in a packers uni is 1,000+ WR. Isnt tnag worth a 1st?
CountDorkula Posted August 24, 2015 Posted August 24, 2015 Why? Woods in a packers uni is 1,000+ WR. Isnt tnag worth a 1st? Very rarely do teams part with a 1st rd pick. Brandon Marshall was just traded for a 5th rd pick. Chicago had to add a 7th Mike Wallace was traded for a 5th rd pick Mia had to add a 7th Kenny Stills for a 3rd rd pick All guys on par or better than Woods.
truth on hold Posted August 24, 2015 Author Posted August 24, 2015 Very rarely do teams part with a 1st rd pick. Brandon Marshall was just traded for a 5th rd pick. Chicago had to add a 7th Mike Wallace was traded for a 5th rd pick Mia had to add a 7th Kenny Stills for a 3rd rd pick All guys on par or better than Woods. Marshal and wallace damaged goods with declining numbers and big contracts. Stills I don't know much about other than being a 5th round pi k whose numbers are inflated due to playing with brees. I would say if they got a 3rd for him there a chance woods gets a 1st (almost certain a 2nd)
GG Posted August 24, 2015 Posted August 24, 2015 Why would somebody trade a 1st rounder for a non-physical WR who doesn't have the talent to play at the upper level in the NFL?
Kelly the Dog Posted August 24, 2015 Posted August 24, 2015 Why would somebody trade a 1st rounder for a non-physical WR who doesn't have the talent to play at the upper level in the NFL? Because he gets in fights and publicly calls out his QB?
Nanker Posted August 24, 2015 Posted August 24, 2015 "Serious Conjecture" indeed. WTF JTSP a 1st? A 1st? Just one 1st? You've got to be joking. Woods is worth at LEAST 2 1sts. Whaley would be nuts to do that trade. IMO
aristocrat Posted August 24, 2015 Posted August 24, 2015 I'm all for exploring what could make our team better in the long term. I'm not saying trade him for nothing but if a team wants a nice number 2 guy who has a low cap hit for two years they might be willing to take a look at woods. We added a ton of talent with clay and shady and if we get an extra first for next years draft we could have the ammo to move and grab a qb maybe or add some talent at a different position.
yungmack Posted August 24, 2015 Posted August 24, 2015 The OP started this thread on Sunday, a traditional day in WNY for over indulgence in adult beverages. Enough said.
Coach Tuesday Posted August 24, 2015 Posted August 24, 2015 Some posters are weathervanes pointing in the wrong direction, always.
RyanC883 Posted August 24, 2015 Posted August 24, 2015 would have to be a 1st. The Packers may bite on that.
CountDorkula Posted August 24, 2015 Posted August 24, 2015 would have to be a 1st. The Packers may bite on that. No, no they wont. You are not going to get a first for Robert Woods.
RyanC883 Posted August 24, 2015 Posted August 24, 2015 I'm all for exploring what could make our team better in the long term. I'm not saying trade him for nothing but if a team wants a nice number 2 guy who has a low cap hit for two years they might be willing to take a look at woods. We added a ton of talent with clay and shady and if we get an extra first for next years draft we could have the ammo to move and grab a qb maybe or add some talent at a different position. not a bad through. I was actually thinking about this yesterday (and was not intoxicated). But, we don't really have a solid #2 after Watkins. On the other hand, perhaps with Harvin and Clay that makes up for it. Then you factor in injuries. But if we get a #1, it makes it hard to pass up because it could be packaged and used to grab a QB if we need one, or if not, could be used on its own to replace Woods if need be. So, yeah, I'm conflicted.
John from Riverside Posted August 24, 2015 Posted August 24, 2015 Why are we even discussing this......Woods is a valuable player to US draft picks are crapshoot
RyanC883 Posted August 24, 2015 Posted August 24, 2015 No, no they wont. You are not going to get a first for Robert Woods. hence the word "may." You probably also thought there was no way you'd get McCoy for Alonso straight up? Strange things happen. If the Packers think they are a WR away from being great now, they could do it. Why are we even discussing this......Woods is a valuable player to US draft picks are crapshoot that's why we are discussing it. Why have a discussion where everyone agrees?
Kelly the Dog Posted August 24, 2015 Posted August 24, 2015 that's why we are discussing it. Why have a discussion where everyone agrees? I don't agree with that.
RyanC883 Posted August 24, 2015 Posted August 24, 2015 I don't agree with that. I don't agree with that
CountDorkula Posted August 24, 2015 Posted August 24, 2015 hence the word "may." You probably also thought there was no way you'd get McCoy for Alonso straight up? Strange things happen. If the Packers think they are a WR away from being great now, they could do it. that's why we are discussing it. Why have a discussion where everyone agrees? Here is how that would go, Packers call about Woods, Bills say give us a first, Packers say no thanks, hang up the phone. Then call 30 other teams about a WR that they can trade a 5th or later for that would put up similar numbers to Woods with Rodgers as their QB.
FireChan Posted August 24, 2015 Posted August 24, 2015 Even if we get a first, it'd be late and we'd need a reliable #2 WR next draft. So uh, we'd just draft another WR?
Kelly the Dog Posted August 24, 2015 Posted August 24, 2015 I don't agree with that M: Oh look, this isn't an argument. A: Yes it is. M: No it isn't. It's just contradiction. A: No it isn't. M: It is! A: It is not. M: Look, you just contradicted me. A: I did not. M: Oh you did!! A: No, no, no. M: You did just then. A: Nonsense! M: Oh, this is futile! A: No it isn't. M: I came here for a good argument. A: No you didn't; no, you came here for an argument. M: An argument isn't just contradiction. A: It can be. M: No it can't. An argument is a connected series of statements intended to establish a proposition. A: No it isn't. M: Yes it is! It's not just contradiction. A: Look, if I argue with you, I must take up a contrary position. M: Yes, but that's not just saying 'No it isn't.' A: Yes it is! M: No it isn't!
Recommended Posts