IDBillzFan Posted February 3, 2016 Posted February 3, 2016 "The 2016 GOP nomination is going to Rand Paul. You watch. This is what I do for a living." --- Chris Matthews in 2013. . In all fairness, he's right. What he does for a living is consistently show how he's wrong about everything.
B-Man Posted February 3, 2016 Posted February 3, 2016 Rand Paul gets some company..................... Rick Santorum to Exit GOP Presidential Race
Nanker Posted February 3, 2016 Author Posted February 3, 2016 About time Rick Sanctimonious dropped out. In fact, he never should have gotten in.
Chef Jim Posted February 3, 2016 Posted February 3, 2016 About time Rick Sanctimonious dropped out. In fact, he never should have gotten in. I didn't know he was still in.
DC Tom Posted February 3, 2016 Posted February 3, 2016 I didn't know he was still in. That's one of the fun things about this year's Republican primaries. I've seen about three people drop out already who I didn't even know were running.
IDBillzFan Posted February 3, 2016 Posted February 3, 2016 That's one of the fun things about this year's Republican primaries. I've seen about three people drop out already who I didn't even know were running. It's dawned on me that there must be a lot of money to be made just by making a half-assed run. Yes, I know, the money doesn't go directly to the candidate, but I think we all know they get their share of it.
reddogblitz Posted February 3, 2016 Posted February 3, 2016 It's dawned on me that there must be a lot of money to be made just by making a half-assed run. Yes, I know, the money doesn't go directly to the candidate, but I think we all know they get their share of it. The Huckster has made a career out of it.
B-Man Posted February 4, 2016 Posted February 4, 2016 (edited) Beyond parody. This B.S. confirms every conservative "off the reservation" trope re: progressive patronization of minorities. NYT: Why the Cruz/Rubio candidacies are not historic "Neither Mr. Cruz nor Mr. Rubio meets conventional expectations of how Latino pols are supposed to behave" http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/02/04/opinion/campaign-stops/ted-cruz-and-marco-rubio-made-history-didnt-you-hear.html?_r=0 … Apparently the NYT now makes the rules on who is latino and who is not. Stay classy libs. . Edited February 4, 2016 by B-Man
B-Man Posted February 4, 2016 Posted February 4, 2016 Ted Cruz is the first Latino to win a caucus or primary. Why isn’t that a bigger deal? Uhhhh. . . . . . . . . because he's a Republican. .
keepthefaith Posted February 4, 2016 Posted February 4, 2016 Ted Cruz is the first Latino to win a caucus or primary. Why isn’t that a bigger deal? Uhhhh. . . . . . . . . because he's a Republican. . and because they aren't "down for the cause". If you're not part of the open border/amnesty crowd for hispanics or part of the other causes for other minorities, you aren't recognized as "one of them".
DC Tom Posted February 4, 2016 Posted February 4, 2016 Beyond parody. This B.S. confirms every conservative "off the reservation" trope re: progressive patronization of minorities. http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/02/04/opinion/campaign-stops/ted-cruz-and-marco-rubio-made-history-didnt-you-hear.html?_r=0 … Apparently the NYT now makes the rules on who is latino and who is not. Stay classy libs. . That is !@#$ing obnoxious. To be Latino, they must conform to an accepted stereotype? Remember when that was called "racism?" Back in...2008, wasn't it?
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted February 4, 2016 Posted February 4, 2016 Viva la Raza! ah yes, the mexican version of "white power." Only no one cares, because they're mexicans.
Nanker Posted February 4, 2016 Author Posted February 4, 2016 ah yes, the mexican version of "white power." Only no one cares, because they're mexicans. No, the progressives are all for la raza because of votes and they're racists. Just like they're for the black-only dorms in some colleges now. That's truly progressive. When Woodrow Wilson was president of Princeton University, he tried to keep blacks out of the school. Princeton, NJ itself was a segregated town. When he was POTUS he was firmly against the integration of the armed forces. That's quite something for the father of "progressiveism". He only took on the mantle of "progressive" because the label of "liberal" was so ****-stained at the time, they needed a new hat to wear in public. Seems like the jerks have come full circle.
B-Man Posted February 4, 2016 Posted February 4, 2016 No, the progressives are all for la raza because of votes and they're racists. Just like they're for the black-only dorms in some colleges now. That's truly progressive. Seems like the jerks have come full circle.
DC Tom Posted February 4, 2016 Posted February 4, 2016 Can you imagine today's "civil rights" crowd marching in Selma 50 years ago? They'd demand a completely separate "safe" bridge be built for them to walk over.
Ozymandius Posted February 7, 2016 Posted February 7, 2016 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AAZfJJNXyqU
/dev/null Posted February 7, 2016 Posted February 7, 2016 Can you imagine today's "civil rights" crowd marching in Selma 50 years ago? They'd demand a completely separate "safe" bridge be built for them to walk over. As long as the bridge is built by an approved contributor to the Party of The People, what's the problem?
Observer Posted February 7, 2016 Posted February 7, 2016 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AAZfJJNXyqU Every time any of them debated Obama, they gave him strength. So much more tearing down of the other guy that discussing specific plans they have to fix things. It was the worst debate yet by far. Clearly Rubio's worst night but bad for all of them and terrible for the party. The winner last night was Hillary Clinton, who had to watch that childish display and know that she'd kill any of those candidates.
Recommended Posts