/dev/null Posted November 11, 2015 Share Posted November 11, 2015 ok then. trumps wig man should be sued. that's no wig. Think about it. Why is Trump crusading against illegal aliens? He's deflecting so folks don't realize the truth. That's not his hair, a weave, or a wig. It's an alien parasite that has attached itself to his spinal column. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted November 11, 2015 Share Posted November 11, 2015 that's no wig. Think about it. Why is Trump crusading against illegal aliens? He's deflecting so folks don't realize the truth. That's not his hair, a weave, or a wig. It's an alien parasite that has attached itself to his spinal column. You mean now I have to vote for Trump? Dammit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted November 11, 2015 Share Posted November 11, 2015 You mean now I have to vote for Trump? Dammit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted November 11, 2015 Author Share Posted November 11, 2015 ok then. trumps wig man should be sued. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
birdog1960 Posted November 11, 2015 Share Posted November 11, 2015 http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=Donald+Trump+Bald&view=detailv2&&id=3F1BC16D82A19788FDAE7D2CCB49605ABFDE0B10&selectedIndex=5&ccid=Z3w%2b4jjW&simid=608001167555365750&thid=OIP.M677c3ee238d6639c0d7b1dfcfd7af11bH0&ajaxhist=0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted November 11, 2015 Share Posted November 11, 2015 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reddogblitz Posted November 12, 2015 Share Posted November 12, 2015 Get kasich off the stage already. Take Bush with him. Kasich is only there for one reason. To be the VP. As a popular governor of Ohio, having him as VP could ca-ching someone into the White House. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keukasmallies Posted November 12, 2015 Share Posted November 12, 2015 Look, it's the troll from under the bridge! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
birdog1960 Posted November 12, 2015 Share Posted November 12, 2015 (edited) Kasich is only there for one reason. To be the VP. As a popular governor of Ohio, having him as VP could ca-ching someone into the White House. i'm confident he has more integrity than latching on with most of the front runners. i could see him teaming up with fiorina but she's the only one that he seems to share any important pov's with. and for some concise fact checking and position analysis: http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/fact-checking-gop-debate/ RUBIO: “Welders make more money than philosophers.” Not so, on average. Rubio is arguing that the U.S. has failed to invest in vocational training — a point also stressed by President Barack Obama’s now-defunct jobs council. But Rubio is wrong to suggest that studying philosophy is a waste of money and time. PayScale, a firm that analyzes compensation, put the median mid-career income for philosophy majors at $81,200 in 2008, with welders making $26,002 to $63,698. And Georgetown University’s Center on Education and the Workforce said in a 2014 analysis that median incomes were $68,000 for people with an advanced degree in philosophy or religious studies. So knowing Plato and getting a college degree still pays off. Edited November 12, 2015 by birdog1960 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted November 12, 2015 Share Posted November 12, 2015 LOL at the multiple media outlets complaining about the GOP debate being boring. Too much substance and policy and not enough soundbites. So if the news media were bored, that’s a good thing. It’s not their job to be entertained. It’s their job to report on what was said. This country has suffered through seven years of “polititainment” as policy. Barack Obama’s sitting down with someone who bathes in cereal or being in a Funny or Die video might make for a lot of YouTube hits, but it doesn’t exactly solve a foreign policy in complete shambles or reassure a restless domestic electorate worried about America’s future. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted November 12, 2015 Share Posted November 12, 2015 LOL at the multiple media outlets complaining about the GOP debate being boring. Too much substance and policy and not enough soundbites. So if the news media were bored, that’s a good thing. It’s not their job to be entertained. It’s their job to report on what was said. This country has suffered through seven years of “polititainment” as policy. Barack Obama’s sitting down with someone who bathes in cereal or being in a Funny or Die video might make for a lot of YouTube hits, but it doesn’t exactly solve a foreign policy in complete shambles or reassure a restless domestic electorate worried about America’s future. Our foreign policy is better off than under the previous President Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted November 12, 2015 Share Posted November 12, 2015 Our foreign policy is better off than under the previous President You've said a lot of things that are stupid, you've said a lot of things that are untrue, you've said a lot of things that are offensive to intellectual rigor, and you've said a lot of things that both you and everyone else knows to be outright lies in order to get a reaction; but, in my recollection, you've never before said something which so squarely hits on all four of those categories at the same time. Good work. You're upping your game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted November 12, 2015 Share Posted November 12, 2015 You've said a lot of things that are stupid, you've said a lot of things that are untrue, you've said a lot of things that are offensive to intellectual rigor, and you've said a lot of things that both you and everyone else knows to be outright lies in order to get a reaction; but, in my recollection, you've never before said something which so squarely hits on all four of those categories at the same time. Good work. You're upping your game. Oh shut up. I call you on your silly libertarian/states rights nonsense which is fantasy stuff and you say I'm wrong because I point out the truth. So, you are not credible Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted November 12, 2015 Share Posted November 12, 2015 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted November 12, 2015 Share Posted November 12, 2015 Oh shut up. I call you on your silly libertarian/states rights nonsense which is fantasy stuff and you say I'm wrong because I point out the truth. So, you are not credible So, you really dislike Thomas Jefferson? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted November 12, 2015 Share Posted November 12, 2015 (edited) So, you really dislike Thomas Jefferson? I'm not a big fan, no. I much prefer Washington and Hamilton Edited November 12, 2015 by gatorman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted November 12, 2015 Share Posted November 12, 2015 I'm not a big fan, no. I much prefer Washington and Hamilton Why? Based on the principles you espouse on here it seems like those would be the last two FF's you'd choose to side with. What makes you prefer Washington and Hamilton over Jefferson? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted November 12, 2015 Share Posted November 12, 2015 Why? Based on the principles you espouse on here it seems like those would be the last two FF's you'd choose to side with. What makes you prefer Washington and Hamilton over Jefferson? I'd tell you but you are so ignorant you would not understand. Why would you say they would be the last two FF I'd agree with? You answer will be funny in a really ignorant kind of way. I'm already laughing just thinking about it! Come on, give it a try! Please!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted November 12, 2015 Share Posted November 12, 2015 I'd tell you but you are so ignorant you would not understand. Why would you say they would be the last two FF I'd agree with? You answer will be funny in a really ignorant kind of way. I'm already laughing just thinking about it! Come on, give it a try! Please!! I ask a serious, honest question and get insulted in return. Shocking. You're the one who said you prefer Washington and Hamilton to Jefferson. There must be a reason, or a number of reasons as to how you reached such a conclusion. Won't you explain further? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted November 12, 2015 Share Posted November 12, 2015 I ask a serious, honest question and get insulted in return. Shocking. You're the one who said you prefer Washington and Hamilton to Jefferson. There must be a reason, or a number of reasons as to how you reached such a conclusion. Won't you explain further? Ok, fine. They both supported a strong federal government and policies that supported economic growth with government support. Now answer my question Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts