birdog1960 Posted July 25, 2015 Posted July 25, 2015 The Koran's a classic? Then how about the Bible? absolutely. required reading. The Koran's a classic? Then how about the Bible? And if I can read Attic Greek, how am I not higher information that someone who's monolingual and can only read Xenophon in translation? you didn't ask if you're higher information, you asked if it was classic. i'm not comfortable as the arbiter of all things classic but i'll play along.
DC Tom Posted July 25, 2015 Posted July 25, 2015 absolutely. required reading. So all those Bible-belt Republicans you accuse of being low-information voters are actually high-information voters? you didn't ask if you're higher information, you asked if it was classic. i'm not comfortable as the arbiter of all things classic but i'll play along. No, I did ask if I were higher information for reading it in Greek. You want to be higher information? Learn to read !@#$ing internet posts. Then maybe try the classics.
birdog1960 Posted July 25, 2015 Posted July 25, 2015 So all those Bible-belt Republicans you accuse of being low-information voters are actually high-information voters? No, I did ask if I were higher information for reading it in Greek. You want to be higher information? Learn to read !@#$ing internet posts. Then maybe try the classics. not if they read it literally. yes, u did.
Chef Jim Posted July 25, 2015 Posted July 25, 2015 read the thread. or seeking the truth = educated = classics = "high information". unless you are demented, delirious or otherwise impaired. which are you? So what proof do you have that seeking the truth (what the !@#$??) + educated + classics = they have any !@#$ing clue with regard to the political issues that face our county today. So unless you have a better arguement other than book smart = well informed on the issues that challenge us from a political standpoint on a day to day basis you appear to be the demented, delirious or impaired one.
birdog1960 Posted July 25, 2015 Posted July 25, 2015 (edited) So what proof do you have that seeking the truth (what the !@#$??) + educated + classics = they have any !@#$ing clue with regard to the political issues that face our county today. So unless you have a better arguement other than book smart = well informed on the issues that challenge us from a political standpoint on a day to day basis you appear to be the demented, delirious or impaired one. have you tried absinthe? here, try one of these and let me know how the odyssey woks out. http://www.epicurious.com/archive/drinking/cocktails/top5_absinthecocktails. these are classics. Edited July 25, 2015 by birdog1960
Ozymandius Posted July 25, 2015 Posted July 25, 2015 seeking the truth = educated = classics = "high information" lol, not a single one of those equal signs is accurate
birdog1960 Posted July 25, 2015 Posted July 25, 2015 lol, not a single one of those equal signs is accurate shite! really? i felt it was a paradigm shift. but seeking the truth is truly good. that's what i think. ok. it's bad to be educated, have studied the classics. but seeking the truth is truly good... unless it results in liberal conclusions..
3rdnlng Posted July 25, 2015 Posted July 25, 2015 shite! really? i felt it was a paradigm shift. but seeking the truth is truly good. that's what i think. ok. it's bad to be educated, have studied the classics. but seeking the truth is truly good... unless it results in liberal conclusions.. Do you not see that you are being mocked for your "classics" statement? Being formally educated to the nth degree, reading MIss Manners and knowing the classics can be a real plus, but it means jack schit in the boarding house at mealtime. As a conservative, I hold true to my beliefs but always question and consider other opinions. Some opposite opinions get a rejection in about three seconds while others get a thorough look see. I'm not against changing my mind on something but there had better be a compelling reason to do so. Liberal arguments usually consist of "feelings" and pie-in-the-sky theories. We conservatives sorta "think" instead of "feel" and have no sympathy for those people that do otherwise.
Nanker Posted July 25, 2015 Posted July 25, 2015 Harvard graduate and "smartest President ever" speaks:
Chef Jim Posted July 25, 2015 Posted July 25, 2015 (edited) have you tried absinthe? here, try one of these and let me know how the odyssey woks out. http://www.epicurious.com/archive/drinking/cocktails/top5_absinthecocktails. these are classics. I've not only tried absinthe I have a client who makes his own and makes it with his homegrown wormwood. So if you can't answer my questions please just admit it. Edited July 25, 2015 by Chef Jim
unbillievable Posted July 25, 2015 Posted July 25, 2015 Beware the idiot with a college degree... ...because they believe a piece of paper proves their stupid ideas have merit.
Alaska Darin Posted July 25, 2015 Posted July 25, 2015 shite! really? i felt it was a paradigm shift. but seeking the truth is truly good. that's what i think. ok. it's bad to be educated, have studied the classics. but seeking the truth is truly good... unless it results in liberal conclusions..Liberal ideology isn't based on truth. Never has been, never will be. That's why it's "ideology." You should read "Socialism Has No Chance of Success" by All of Recorded History. It's a timeless masterpiece.
IDBillzFan Posted July 25, 2015 Posted July 25, 2015 University of Delaware BA double major in history and political science. Law degree from Syracuse. Two pieces of paper. Can't count.
Azalin Posted July 25, 2015 Posted July 25, 2015 You should read "Socialism Has No Chance of Success" by All of Recorded History. It's a timeless masterpiece.
DC Tom Posted July 25, 2015 Posted July 25, 2015 You should read "Socialism Has No Chance of Success" by All of Recorded History. It's a timeless masterpiece. a/k/a Plato's Republic. Which is a classic, but apparently not that kind of classic.
Nanker Posted July 25, 2015 Posted July 25, 2015 Oh yes, they're WAY smarter than us. Can't change a light bulb or take out the trash, but man - are they brilliant!
DC Tom Posted July 25, 2015 Posted July 25, 2015 Oh yes, they're WAY smarter than us. Can't change a light bulb or take out the trash, but man - are they brilliant! We have people who do that **** for us. We're too busy reading the classics.
birdog1960 Posted July 26, 2015 Posted July 26, 2015 We have people who do that **** for us. We're too busy reading the classics. sorry, i've been busy mowing and weed eating. but it's interesting that you all often accuse me of being politically motivated by envy of the very wealthy. oh well, back to studying board review materials. now those are classics..
Rob's House Posted July 26, 2015 Author Posted July 26, 2015 Going into last week I didn't really know much about the various presidential candidates' positions or track records in the issues, but I read Pride & Prejudice over the weekend so I feel like I'm up to speed now.
Recommended Posts