DC Tom Posted February 9, 2016 Posted February 9, 2016 He worked for Reagan Was he campaigning for Reagan?
Nanker Posted February 9, 2016 Posted February 9, 2016 Stop obfuscating, Tom! Does anyone know if there is a single post in this 106 page thread that lists the merits of Hillary as POTUS? I can't recall any poster here that has written a coherent post in support of her. Anyone want to take a crack at that? She has a vagina.
TPS Posted February 9, 2016 Posted February 9, 2016 He wasn't wrong at all. He most certainly was. Supply-side economics is laffable.
keepthefaith Posted February 9, 2016 Posted February 9, 2016 He most certainly was. Supply-side economics is laffable. It's a matter of opinion like so many other things. His work showing that tax revenue is more closely tied to economic activity than tax rates is pretty solid, but you'll probably laff at that too.
....lybob Posted February 9, 2016 Posted February 9, 2016 It's a matter of opinion like so many other things. His work showing that tax revenue is more closely tied to economic activity than tax rates is pretty solid, but you'll probably laff at that too. There is zero correlation between lower tax rates and increased GDP growth in fact if anything there is correlation between high tax rates and higher GDP growth - of course correlation doesn't prove causation but you should at least have correlation before you claim something.
/dev/null Posted February 9, 2016 Posted February 9, 2016 There is zero correlation between lower tax rates and increased GDP growth in fact if anything there is correlation between high tax rates and higher GDP growth - of course correlation doesn't prove causation but you should at least have correlation before you claim something.
unbillievable Posted February 10, 2016 Posted February 10, 2016 There is zero correlation between lower tax rates and increased GDP growth in fact if anything there is correlation between high tax rates and higher GDP growth - of course correlation doesn't prove causation but you should at least have correlation before you claim something. Math says you're wrong.
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted February 10, 2016 Posted February 10, 2016 It was a joy to see the harpy get her face melted. However, once the blacks in SC get a hold of the election, it's all over for ol' bern.
Azalin Posted February 10, 2016 Posted February 10, 2016 He most certainly was. Supply-side economics is laffable. I see what you did there....
3rdnlng Posted February 10, 2016 Posted February 10, 2016 Stop obfuscating, Tom! She has a vagina. Do we know this for sure?
B-Man Posted February 10, 2016 Posted February 10, 2016 David Burge @iowahawkblog 5m5 minutes ago "I support all your new tax ideas, and I'm really looking forward to not paying them."
IDBillzFan Posted February 10, 2016 Posted February 10, 2016 Wow. I had no idea Al Sharpton hated women this much.
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted February 10, 2016 Posted February 10, 2016 Wow. I had no idea Al Sharpton hated women this much. Or that he loved Jews this much.
DC Tom Posted February 10, 2016 Posted February 10, 2016 Wow. I had no idea Al Sharpton hated women this much. I knew. I remember what he did to Tawana Brawley.
IDBillzFan Posted February 10, 2016 Posted February 10, 2016 I knew. I remember what he did to Tawana Brawley. He hates women AND children.
....lybob Posted February 10, 2016 Posted February 10, 2016 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ptJf3ju3X1g
Chef Jim Posted February 10, 2016 Posted February 10, 2016 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ptJf3ju3X1g Wow. That was loaded with substance.
DC Tom Posted February 10, 2016 Posted February 10, 2016 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ptJf3ju3X1g That's actually a pretty good commercial. #BlackLivesMatter must hate it - too bad for Bernie that divisiveness is the new inclusiveness.
Recommended Posts