/dev/null Posted October 21, 2015 Posted October 21, 2015 It's always different this time. Of course it will be different this time. And if you ask any Lefty why it hadn't worked before they'll tell you whoever was doing it wrong or they were corrupted by all the power. But when the current Lefties do it, they will do it the right way and totally uncorrupted
unbillievable Posted October 21, 2015 Posted October 21, 2015 Why is Bernie trying to explain "democratic socialism"? The people who don't know what it is, are the ones supporting him.
birdog1960 Posted October 21, 2015 Posted October 21, 2015 Why is Bernie trying to explain "democratic socialism"? The people who don't know what it is, are the ones supporting him. incorrect.
Chef Jim Posted October 21, 2015 Posted October 21, 2015 incorrect. Ahhh so you've personally talked with everyone who supports him. No wonder you don't have time to type your posts.
birdog1960 Posted October 21, 2015 Posted October 21, 2015 Ahhh so you've personally talked with everyone who supports him. No wonder you don't have time to type your posts. since you have great difficulty with inference i'll explain. I support him. I am "one". I know what is meant by democratic socialism. therefore, unbill's statement is incorrect.
Joe Miner Posted October 21, 2015 Posted October 21, 2015 since you have great difficulty with inference i'll explain. I support him. I am "one". I know what is meant by democratic socialism. therefore, unbill's statement is incorrect. And when asked what it is, is able to reply with Denmark and IKEA.
DC Tom Posted October 21, 2015 Posted October 21, 2015 since you have great difficulty with inference i'll explain. I support him. I am "one". I know what is meant by democratic socialism. therefore, unbill's statement is incorrect. You are "one." You are not "ones." The distinction is why grammar is important.
Chef Jim Posted October 22, 2015 Posted October 22, 2015 You are "one." You are not "ones." The distinction is why grammar is important. He is taking ones to be all inclusive and he says I have a problem with inference.
DC Tom Posted October 22, 2015 Posted October 22, 2015 He is taking ones to be all inclusive and he says I have a problem with inference. Yeah, it couldn't possibly that he has the communications abilities of a hamster. It's everyone else's fault for not reading his mind when he "implicitly points things out."
birdog1960 Posted October 22, 2015 Posted October 22, 2015 (edited) Yeah, it couldn't possibly that he has the communications abilities of a hamster. It's everyone else's fault for not reading his mind when he "implicitly points things out." i am among the ones supporting him, but you knew that. the logical diagram remains. keep it up with the intellectual dishonesty. it's true to form and defining. Edited October 22, 2015 by birdog1960
DC Tom Posted October 22, 2015 Posted October 22, 2015 i am among the ones supporting him, but you knew that. the logical diagram remains. keep it up with the intellectual dishonesty. it's true to form and defining. 1) "Among the ones" is not "the ones." That particular logical fallacy - that an individual selected from a group defines the group as a whole - is one of the biggest reasons you're such a fool. 2) Blaming others for not Your initial response - "incorrect" - provided absolutely no context for inferring your logical fallacy. 3) Pointing out that you you have the communications abilities of a hamster is not "intellectual dishonesty." Accusing others of being unable to deductively reason that you define a group of people from the word "incorrect" is, however. Admit it...you're mildly aphasic, aren't you?
Chef Jim Posted October 22, 2015 Posted October 22, 2015 Admit it...you're mildly aphasic, aren't you? Ok I had to look that up and calling him mildly aphasic is putting it mildly.
FireChan Posted October 22, 2015 Posted October 22, 2015 Ok I had to look that up and calling him mildly aphasic is putting it mildly. I read "does not affect intelligence," and I immediately threw it out of the differential.
birdog1960 Posted October 22, 2015 Posted October 22, 2015 lets try this again although i'm confident it will be futile. premises:1) I am among the people ("ones") that support sanders) 2) the people that support sanders is inclusive of all supporters including me 3) I know what democratic socialism is. therefore, the statement: the people that don't know what democratic socialism is are the ones supporting sanders is untrue. if you disagree, construct a logical diagram that disproves this. but you won't because it's not about debate to you. that would require honesty.
Chef Jim Posted October 22, 2015 Posted October 22, 2015 lets try this again although i'm confident it will be futile. premises:1) I am among the people ("ones") that support sanders) 2) the people that support sanders is inclusive of all supporters including me 3) I know what democratic socialism is. therefore, the statement: the people that don't know what democratic socialism is are the ones supporting sanders is untrue. if you disagree, construct a logical diagram that disproves this. but you won't because it's not about debate to you. that would require honesty. People who took the comment "the ones that support Sanders" literally to be all inclusive are not worth debating. Done.
birdog1960 Posted October 22, 2015 Posted October 22, 2015 (edited) People who took the comment "the ones that support Sanders" literally to be all inclusive are not worth debating. Done. uh huh. that's what I thought. if you can't win, you cheat. I you can't cheat, you quit. Edited October 22, 2015 by birdog1960
Chef Jim Posted October 22, 2015 Posted October 22, 2015 uh huh. that's what I thought. if you can't win, you cheat. I you can't cheat, you quit. I feel sorry for you being this proud of something this stupid.
meazza Posted October 22, 2015 Posted October 22, 2015 I feel sorry for you being this proud of something this stupid.
birdog1960 Posted October 22, 2015 Posted October 22, 2015 (edited) I feel sorry for you being this proud of something this stupid. I feel sorry for you repeatedly berating and arguing things you're clearly incorrect about. it's a clear character flaw. wait for it...next will being some obfuscation or some other form of dirty pool. Edited October 22, 2015 by birdog1960
Chef Jim Posted October 22, 2015 Posted October 22, 2015 I feel sorry for you repeatedly berating and arguing things you're clearly incorrect about. it's a clear character flaw. wait for it...next will being some obfuscation or some other form of dirty pool. Obfuscation or dirty pool?? Repeatedly berating and arguing? You sad little man. But hey, you won right.
Recommended Posts