mead107 Posted October 22, 2015 Share Posted October 22, 2015 I hope he gets the nomination Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted October 22, 2015 Share Posted October 22, 2015 I feel sorry for you repeatedly berating and arguing things you're clearly incorrect about. it's a clear character flaw. wait for it...next will being some obfuscation or some other form of dirty pool. If this sort of dumbassery doesn't work for gatorman, what makes you think it'll work for you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
birdog1960 Posted October 22, 2015 Share Posted October 22, 2015 If this sort of dumbassery doesn't work for gatorman, what makes you think it'll work for you? dumbassery? you mean pointing out cheap and pathetic tactics used to skirt real debate. you are right. it only works when you are dealing with someone that possesses a conscience and sense of fairness. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meazza Posted October 22, 2015 Share Posted October 22, 2015 dumbassery? you mean pointing out cheap and pathetic tactics used to skirt real debate. you are right. it only works when you are dealing with someone that possesses a conscience and sense of fairness. Do you have a conscience or are the people you force to type for you the ones with a conscience. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted October 22, 2015 Share Posted October 22, 2015 dumbassery? you mean pointing out cheap and pathetic tactics used to skirt real debate. you are right. it only works when you are dealing with someone that possesses a conscience and sense of fairness. Cheap pathetic tactics? Lack of conscience and fairness? Damn I'd hate to see how wound up you's get for something that is not absolutely stupid and that actually matters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted October 22, 2015 Share Posted October 22, 2015 dumbassery? you mean pointing out cheap and pathetic tactics used to skirt real debate. you are right. it only works when you are dealing with someone that possesses a conscience and sense of fairness. Incorrect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
birdog1960 Posted October 22, 2015 Share Posted October 22, 2015 (edited) Cheap pathetic tactics? Lack of conscience and fairness? Damn I'd hate to see how wound up you's get for something that is not absolutely stupid and that actually matters. almost nothing done here actually matters save perhaps discussions on the pope which occasionally illustrate what moral leadership is. everything else is a game. and it could actually be a decent game since a few cons here are marginally smarter than rocks. but it's a bad game because the rules of decent conduct and discussion are completely ignored and ridiculed by one neanderthal (http://www.nature.com/news/early-european-may-have-had-neanderthal-great-great-grandparent-1.17534 - chef do you chew your steak tartare with dentures?)side in the argument. too bad... Edited October 22, 2015 by birdog1960 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reddogblitz Posted October 23, 2015 Share Posted October 23, 2015 since you have great difficulty with inference i'll explain. I support him. I am "one". I know what is meant by therefore, unbill's statement is incorrect. I support Bernie as well and I know what is meant by democratic socialism too. So now birddog is officially part of the ones. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted October 23, 2015 Share Posted October 23, 2015 I support Bernie as well and I know what is meant by democratic socialism too. So now birddog is officially part of the ones.You support slavery? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Miner Posted October 23, 2015 Share Posted October 23, 2015 You support slavery? Not slavery. Democratic slavery. It's better, all the benefits of slavery without any of the negatives. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob's House Posted October 23, 2015 Author Share Posted October 23, 2015 Every Bernie supporter I talk to thinks you can fund $1+ trillion of new spending annually by cutting ~ $200 billion in defense spending. Apparently math and morality are mutually exclusive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted October 23, 2015 Share Posted October 23, 2015 Every Bernie supporter I talk to thinks you can fund $1+ trillion of new spending annually by cutting ~ $200 billion in defense spending. Apparently math and morality are mutually exclusive. Math is a tool of oppression for the 1%. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dorkington Posted October 23, 2015 Share Posted October 23, 2015 I love this place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted October 23, 2015 Share Posted October 23, 2015 Bernie continues to draw large crowds and poll well, yet you hardly see much about him in the national media these days, I wonder why? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unbillievable Posted October 23, 2015 Share Posted October 23, 2015 I should clarify that there is a difference between knowing what Democratic Socialism does, and understanding it. People know that Bernie is promising "free" stuff, they just don't understand (or care) how he's going to do it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
birdog1960 Posted October 23, 2015 Share Posted October 23, 2015 I should clarify that there is a difference between knowing what Democratic Socialism does, and understanding it. People know that Bernie is promising "free" stuff, they just don't understand (or care) how he's going to do it. you keep using this inclusive word "people". I submit that there are plenty of specific people that are very well informed on these issues. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted October 23, 2015 Share Posted October 23, 2015 you keep using this inclusive word "people". I submit that there are plenty of specific people that are very well informed on these issues. Yes, and those people are vocal supporters of slavery. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted October 23, 2015 Share Posted October 23, 2015 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cinga Posted October 23, 2015 Share Posted October 23, 2015 Ah come on!!! Quit picking on Bernie!!! Heck, everyone knows he's not the brightest bulb in the POTUS race except for a handful of supporters equally lacking any basic intelli..... Oh, wait... guess that explains 52 pages of bloviating.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
birdog1960 Posted October 24, 2015 Share Posted October 24, 2015 (edited) Ah come on!!! Quit picking on Bernie!!! Heck, everyone knows he's not the brightest bulb in the POTUS race except for a handful of supporters equally lacking any basic intelli..... Oh, wait... guess that explains 52 pages of bloviating.... here we go again with the all inclusive terms. guess i'm not everyone (everyman http://www.cummingsstudyguides.net/Guides3/Everyman.html - it's a classic!)?. i think he's quite bright. he had the credentials to get in to and graduate from univ of chicago. i don't think he grabbed any coat tails to do that. i'm trying to think of a repug candidate that is brighter. Jeb? Trump? nope and nope. also rans? nope,nope,nope…. oh and i'm wondering where the word bloviating might source to in your post…but not wondering hard. Edited October 24, 2015 by birdog1960 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts