B-Man Posted July 18, 2016 Share Posted July 18, 2016 SECRET DOCUMENT LIFTS IRAN NUKE CONSTRAINTS... CUTS TIME TEHRAN WOULD NEED TO BUILD BOMB IN HALF... FLASHBACK: How Obama Admin Lied To Sell Deal... doesn't matter if you were pro or anti treaty.......................show of hands............................who is surprised ? . Well sh*t............this post is awkward............... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted July 18, 2016 Share Posted July 18, 2016 Well sh*t............this post is awkward............... 'Da !@#$? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted July 26, 2016 Share Posted July 26, 2016 No. Really. This is the story at the Boston Globe: Kerry to North Korea - Learn from the Iran Deal, or else! Or else, what? You'll send them $100M, too? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted July 26, 2016 Share Posted July 26, 2016 Or else suffer the horrible ignominy of having a red line drawn across the 38th parallel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drinkTHEkoolaid Posted July 26, 2016 Share Posted July 26, 2016 They did learn. Iran for millions of dollars to pay NK to develop nuclear weapons for them. That's economic stimulus. Summer of recovery 32. If they have jobs they won't be terrorists amirite? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keepthefaith Posted July 26, 2016 Share Posted July 26, 2016 No. Really. This is the story at the Boston Globe: Kerry to North Korea - Learn from the Iran Deal, or else! Or else, what? You'll send them $100M, too? Is there a bigger blowhard in Washington than Kerry? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted July 26, 2016 Share Posted July 26, 2016 Is there a bigger blowhard in Washington than Kerry? Not today because I think she's in Philly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted August 10, 2016 Share Posted August 10, 2016 Congress floods WH with demands for info on $400M payoff to Iran. Maybe the WH will hire baskin as press secretary to show everyone the stories about this pay-for-hostage deal in January. Oh, wait. They can't because there WERE NO stories back then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted August 11, 2016 Share Posted August 11, 2016 More administration lies....................... Despite Obama's Claims, No Supporters for Iran Deal In IsraelBreakingIsraelNews ^ | August 7, 2016 | Adam Eliyahu Berkowitz On Thursday, US President Barack Obama proclaimed that Israel was now a supporter of his nuclear deal with Iran, but on Friday, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu corrected him, saying that Israel is more worried about the deal than ever. President Obama held a press briefing at the Pentagon on Thursday, coping with a revelation that the US flew pallets loaded with $400 million in cash to Iran in an unmarked cargo plane. At the press conference, President Obama claimed that the time since signing the Iran deal has proven that it is an unmitigated success. {snip} “And it’s not just the assessment of our intelligence community. It’s the assessment of the Israeli military and intelligence community,” he stressed. “The country that was most opposed to this deal that acknowledges this has been a game-changer that Iran has abided by the deal that they no longer have the sort of short term breakout capacity that would allow them to develop nuclear weapons.” On Friday, Prime Minister Netanyahu jumped in to correct President Obama. “While Israel’s view on the Iran deal remains unchanged… it firmly believes that Israel has no greater ally than the United States,” said a statement released by Netanyahu’s office. “Prime Minister Netanyahu looks forward to further strengthening the alliance between Israel and the United States with President Obama and with the next U.S. administration,” it added. Tzachi Hanegbi (Likud) agreed with his party leader. “I don’t know to which Israelis [Obama] spoke recently,” said Hanegbi, “But I can promise you that the position of the prime minister, the defense minister and of most senior officials in the defense establishment has not changed,” he told The Times of Israel. “The opposite is the case. The time that has elapsed since the deal was signed proved that all our worries that, regrettably, we had before the deal was made, were justified.” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted August 17, 2016 Share Posted August 17, 2016 WSJ now reports from US officials that the US purposely scripted the exchange of $400M to Iran not to take place until the hostages were freed. Man, for a non-ransom payment, that sure sounds a lot like a ransom payment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted August 17, 2016 Share Posted August 17, 2016 WSJ now reports from US officials that the US purposely scripted the exchange of $400M to Iran not to take place until the hostages were freed. Man, for a non-ransom payment, that sure sounds a lot like a ransom payment. So the next time some shooter creates a "hostage situation," we should say "No, he's' crafting a tightly scripted exchange specifically timed to the satisfaction of his requests?" Best euphemism ever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted August 17, 2016 Share Posted August 17, 2016 WSJ now reports from US officials that the US purposely scripted the exchange of $400M to Iran not to take place until the hostages were freed. Man, for a non-ransom payment, that sure sounds a lot like a ransom payment. Especially since the converse actually happened. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted August 18, 2016 Share Posted August 18, 2016 WSJ now reports from US officials that the US purposely scripted the exchange of $400M to Iran not to take place until the hostages were freed. Man, for a non-ransom payment, that sure sounds a lot like a ransom payment. Bah. This was all over the papers in February. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meazza Posted August 18, 2016 Share Posted August 18, 2016 Bah. This was all over the papers in February. Lol Are you doubting baskin's sincerity? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted August 19, 2016 Share Posted August 19, 2016 Ok ok maybe it was kind of sort of maybe possibly perhaps ransom. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted August 19, 2016 Share Posted August 19, 2016 Ok ok maybe it was kind of sort of maybe possibly perhaps ransom. The current excuse is "No, they didn't hold prisoners until we gave them money. We held the money until they gave us the prisoners." So it's not ransom, it's blackmail. Retroactive blackmail. Or reverse blackmail. Bizarro-world blackmail. But not ransom...nuh-uh, no way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted August 19, 2016 Share Posted August 19, 2016 ...................... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted August 20, 2016 Share Posted August 20, 2016 WashPost Buries Iran-Ransom Admission in Middle of Page A-10 — Despite Ransom Paid for Post Reporter! Just think of the Post and the rest of the MSM as Democrat operatives — Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted August 20, 2016 Share Posted August 20, 2016 WashPost Buries Iran-Ransom Admission in Middle of Page A-10 Despite Ransom Paid for Post Reporter! Just think of the Post and the rest of the MSM as Democrat operatives If there was any question before, the past few months have proven this. Sad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted September 7, 2016 Share Posted September 7, 2016 ABC NewsVerified account @ABC 7h7 hours ago Obama administration acknowledges its transfer of $1.7 billion to Iran earlier this year was made entirely in cash.http://abcn.ws/2bWdXza Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts