FireChan Posted July 10, 2015 Author Share Posted July 10, 2015 Mark it down folks. FC just said that the Patriots are better without Brady than the Bills are without EJ if they both go out. He must think something positive about EJ to think that. Nah, I just know Belichick would work some black magic to get a playoff berth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Wiz Posted July 10, 2015 Share Posted July 10, 2015 Nah, I just know Belichick would work some black magic to get a playoff berth. I think that's call the Matt Cassel Effect. They sometimes call it cheating too but they don't care. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SJDK Posted July 10, 2015 Share Posted July 10, 2015 No.this is the correct answer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Augie Posted July 10, 2015 Share Posted July 10, 2015 Nah, I just know Belichick would work some black magic to get a playoff berth. Black magic? It's Belichick.... more like Black Ops. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFan-4-Ever Posted July 10, 2015 Share Posted July 10, 2015 Good enough to get to the postseason does not equal a better QB situation. yet you trash EJ every chance you get. RE: Pats better than Bills w/o Brady* or EJ Then I wholeheartedly, but respectfully, disagree with you. I often wonder ... does anyone take him serious any more? Mark it down folks. FC just said that the Patriots are better without Brady than the Bills are without EJ if they both go out. He must think something positive about EJ to think that. drunken texting maybe or will he will blame auto correct. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jumbalaya Posted July 10, 2015 Share Posted July 10, 2015 Let's stop drinking the off season kool aid. We should stop calling this D great, stellar or elite until after the season or at ;east let them play half the season. Also stop saying how good our WRs, RBs, and TE's are until after the season. Our Oline looks pitiful and so are our QBs. As the play of the WRS, RBs and TEs is entirely dependent upon two wobbly pillars they probably won't be as good as advertised. Again we drink the kool aid that a rd 3 rookie G is the answer; Glenn will rebound, Wood will step up, Henderson or Kujo will play like a pro, and Incognito won't get suspended for something stupid. Three things could happen with this unit. 1 all positives happen and they improve. 2, all bad things happen and they blow up. 3 some good, some bad, they play mediocre to poor all year. Chances are it's number 3. We drink the kool aid that a 3 man competition will spit out a reliable QB? When / where has that ever actually happened before? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dorkington Posted July 10, 2015 Share Posted July 10, 2015 Let's stop drinking the off season kool aid. We should stop calling this D great, stellar or elite until after the season or at ;east let them play half the season. Also stop saying how good our WRs, RBs, and TE's are until after the season. Our Oline looks pitiful and so are our QBs. As the play of the WRS, RBs and TEs is entirely dependent upon two wobbly pillars they probably won't be as good as advertised. Again we drink the kool aid that a rd 3 rookie G is the answer; Glenn will rebound, Wood will step up, Henderson or Kujo will play like a pro, and Incognito won't get suspended for something stupid. Three things could happen with this unit. 1 all positives happen and they improve. 2, all bad things happen and they blow up. 3 some good, some bad, they play mediocre to poor all year. Chances are it's number 3. We drink the kool aid that a 3 man competition will spit out a reliable QB? When / where has that ever actually happened before? So we need to wait until the end of the season to say good things, but we can say bad things before the first game? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gugny Posted July 10, 2015 Share Posted July 10, 2015 Let's stop drinking the off season kool aid. We should stop calling this D great, stellar or elite until after the season or at ;east let them play half the season. Also stop saying how good our WRs, RBs, and TE's are until after the season. Our Oline looks pitiful and so are our QBs. As the play of the WRS, RBs and TEs is entirely dependent upon two wobbly pillars they probably won't be as good as advertised. Again we drink the kool aid that a rd 3 rookie G is the answer; Glenn will rebound, Wood will step up, Henderson or Kujo will play like a pro, and Incognito won't get suspended for something stupid. Three things could happen with this unit. 1 all positives happen and they improve. 2, all bad things happen and they blow up. 3 some good, some bad, they play mediocre to poor all year. Chances are it's number 3. We drink the kool aid that a 3 man competition will spit out a reliable QB? When / where has that ever actually happened before? So the D that was great last year, and has only lost Spikes, isn't great anymore? Sammy Watkins and Robert Woods aren't going to be good - even though they were very good last year? We lost CJ Spiller, but gained McCoy ... and that's not an upgrade? That's not drinking Kool Aid. It's looking at it for what it is. Can't all bad things happen to all teams? So if you'd like to stop drinking the off season kool aid, then go for it. But don't think just because you're a negative nancy that everyone else should be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocky Landing Posted July 10, 2015 Share Posted July 10, 2015 Let's stop drinking the off season kool aid. We should stop calling this D great, stellar or elite until after the season or at ;east let them play half the season. Also stop saying how good our WRs, RBs, and TE's are until after the season. Our Oline looks pitiful and so are our QBs. As the play of the WRS, RBs and TEs is entirely dependent upon two wobbly pillars they probably won't be as good as advertised. Again we drink the kool aid that a rd 3 rookie G is the answer; Glenn will rebound, Wood will step up, Henderson or Kujo will play like a pro, and Incognito won't get suspended for something stupid. Three things could happen with this unit. 1 all positives happen and they improve. 2, all bad things happen and they blow up. 3 some good, some bad, they play mediocre to poor all year. Chances are it's number 3. We drink the kool aid that a 3 man competition will spit out a reliable QB? When / where has that ever actually happened before? Have you considered writing for NFL.com? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloHokie13 Posted July 10, 2015 Share Posted July 10, 2015 Let's stop drinking the off season kool aid. We should stop calling this D great, stellar or elite until after the season or at ;east let them play half the season. Also stop saying how good our WRs, RBs, and TE's are until after the season. Our Oline looks pitiful and so are our QBs. As the play of the WRS, RBs and TEs is entirely dependent upon two wobbly pillars they probably won't be as good as advertised. Again we drink the kool aid that a rd 3 rookie G is the answer; Glenn will rebound, Wood will step up, Henderson or Kujo will play like a pro, and Incognito won't get suspended for something stupid. Three things could happen with this unit. 1 all positives happen and they improve. 2, all bad things happen and they blow up. 3 some good, some bad, they play mediocre to poor all year. Chances are it's number 3. We drink the kool aid that a 3 man competition will spit out a reliable QB? When / where has that ever actually happened before? Wasn't there a competition in 2012 somewhere in the pacific northwest between Matt Flynn, Tavaris Jackson, and Russell Wilson? Remind me how that turned out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gugny Posted July 10, 2015 Share Posted July 10, 2015 Wasn't there a competition in 2012 somewhere in the pacific northwest between Matt Flynn, Tavaris Jackson, and Russell Wilson? Remind me how that turned out. 2/3 ended up Bills. The other one ended up winning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GunnerBill Posted July 10, 2015 Share Posted July 10, 2015 So we need to wait until the end of the season to say good things, but we can say bad things before the first game? Exactly what I was going to say. As much as I do think people are overestimating how great our offensive weapons will be I think people are underestimating how solid our line could be. So I think we will have an o-line that ranks somewhere middle of the pack 14-18th territory but of the new offensive weapons I think only Clay is going to live up to his billing. McCoy will be solid but not a superstar and Harvin will disappoint. Now none of that is any more than speculation at this stage, but if you are allowed to speculate the negative you should be allowed to speculate the positive too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LB3 Posted July 10, 2015 Share Posted July 10, 2015 Let's stop drinking the off season kool aid. I can stop drinking whenever I want to. It's not like I'm addicted, it's just nice to throw some back after a long hard day......I've got it under control.....I swear! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanC883 Posted July 10, 2015 Share Posted July 10, 2015 If the refs call holding on the Pats*** line, Brady gets pressured, then yes, we have a better QB situation. Brady simply cannot deal with pressure the way Manuel or Taylor can. In terms of depth, I'd take our "overall depth" over the Pats***. But only one QB plays at a time, and that QB is Brady, so the starting QB situation is tilted greatly in favor of Brady unless a D can pressure him. Then he turns to average. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
White Linen Posted July 10, 2015 Share Posted July 10, 2015 My TBD life got significantly better when I put Fire Chan on ignore a while ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CodeMonkey Posted July 10, 2015 Share Posted July 10, 2015 So we need to wait until the end of the season to say good things, but we can say bad things before the first game? He is saying the bad things from last season so his post is consistent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocky Landing Posted July 11, 2015 Share Posted July 11, 2015 He is saying the bad things from last season so his post is consistent. He said we should stop calling our D great. Was our D not great last season? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chandler#81 Posted July 11, 2015 Share Posted July 11, 2015 To the OP question: who'd you take Garrapalo over any of our current QB's? Nevermind the 'other guy', if your answer is yes, then the answer to the Topic question is a HELL NO! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#34fan Posted July 12, 2015 Share Posted July 12, 2015 Hey Chan, your thread sucks but that's not why I'm here... Just wanted to clarify a little factoid I got wrong in a discusssion with you the other day... Russell Wilson was 10th in total offense out of active starting QB's, NOT 1st like I stated previously..... Still pretty damn good, though.... Anyway, that's all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FireChan Posted July 12, 2015 Author Share Posted July 12, 2015 My TBD life got significantly better when I put Fire Chan on ignore a while ago. You just can't quit me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts