Mr. WEO Posted June 24, 2015 Posted June 24, 2015 maybe already posted but Sal Pal predicted a 1 game suspension today. He will get a letter from Roger saying he is exonerated which is what Brady wants. The 1 game will be for not cooperating with initial investigation. Basically because neither wants to go to court. Worse case for Bills fans, but i could see this. Recent suspensions that went to court were reversed (but both were "indefinite" suspensions...AP and Rice). I still see 2 games. But there is no precedent for what Brady is being suspended for, so who knows?
BillsFan-4-Ever Posted June 24, 2015 Posted June 24, 2015 Recent suspensions that went to court were reversed (but both were "indefinite" suspensions...AP and Rice). I still see 2 games. But there is no precedent for what Brady is being suspended for, so who knows? Roger needs to stand firm. come on he had to listen to over 10 hours of lies!! then let the idiot go to court where he has to provide his court records Even if he doesn't get off scott-free. What player wouldn't trade a 4-game suspension for a Superbowl ring? This has already proven that cheating works. point well taken. but with this he officially gets an *
CodeMonkey Posted June 25, 2015 Posted June 25, 2015 You don't think it would be amazing to hear that excuse all year and then beat them again, with him, in Foxborough? No. I'd rather beat him twice.
Saxum Posted June 25, 2015 Posted June 25, 2015 I'd rather do what one writer suggested on NFL.com - lengthen sentence. It has to be an option in appeals otherwise everyone would appeal everything which actually seems to happen.
FluffHead Posted July 9, 2015 Posted July 9, 2015 @JGolden5: Spotted together in #SunValley - NFL Commish Roger Goodell and Bob Kraft http://t.co/N25ZCP4Ecn Fishy
BuffaloFan68 Posted July 9, 2015 Posted July 9, 2015 I say suspend him for at least 4 games & may the Cheatriots never make the playoffs again for at least 20 years.
YoloinOhio Posted July 9, 2015 Posted July 9, 2015 Julia Boorstin @JBoorstin 14m14 minutes ago A ruling on #DeflateGate is coming soon- could be as soon as next week- says @nfl commissioner Roger Goodell #SunValley
Hapless Bills Fan Posted July 9, 2015 Posted July 9, 2015 With the appeal in progress I was just thinking of some possible scenarios and figured these two were the most interesting. Now keep in mind that these options are including federal court appeals and such but was honestly curious. Would you prefer he played and go on record that he did in fact cheat or would you prefer him to do nothing and take the 4 games? It's a mixed emotion I feel thinking about it because obviously I think the Bills would be better off not playing him week 2 but I also would like all of the Pats** fans to realize that their golden boy is actually a liar and a cheater. What say you? Also, this is the first poll I've done so I probably screwed something up. EDIT: Yup, screwed up the polling. Either way. What do you think? I would like him to take the 4 games and admit he cheated, but when offered the "dead lion or live mouse" thing I've always gone for "live lion"
MattM Posted July 9, 2015 Posted July 9, 2015 (edited) Julia Boorstin @JBoorstin 14m14 minutes ago A ruling on #DeflateGate is coming soon- could be as soon as next week- says @nfl commissioner Roger Goodell #SunValley Considering Goodell was just seen with Kraft* in Sun Valley, that does not bode well for Tommy Boy doing the full time. Perhaps they were putting the finishing touches on the deal made earlier over the draft picks. And here's PFT's article on this--unless you're in the tank, how the heck do you not mention the recent Kraft*--Goodell meeting when reporting this news? http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2015/07/09/goodell-ruling-on-tom-bradys-deflategate-appeal-coming-soon/ Edited July 9, 2015 by MattM
Augie Posted July 9, 2015 Posted July 9, 2015 No. I'd rather beat him twice. My first choice is beating Brady twice, If I can't have that, I'll take beating the rest of the cheaters twice.
Talley56 Posted July 9, 2015 Posted July 9, 2015 After seeing Maria Sharapova lose to Serena Williams yet again today it makes me realize how deflating (no pun intended) it can be to constantly lose to someone over and over. I'd prefer beating them with Brady but then again I don't want him to get let off the hook for not cooperating with the investigation. I think that is a more serious offense than people realize.
Direhard Fan Posted July 9, 2015 Posted July 9, 2015 If they didn't invent the Tuck Rule he wouln't even be a topic. There for I say punish the punk.
KollegeStudnet Posted July 9, 2015 Posted July 9, 2015 Instead of a four game suspension, now ten games
The Wiz Posted July 10, 2015 Author Posted July 10, 2015 (edited) I would like him to take the 4 games and admit he cheated, but when offered the "dead lion or live mouse" thing I've always gone for "live lion" Unfortunately, you and I both know Brady is going to do whatever he can to make it seem like he never lied when anyone with half a brain or isn't from NE knows better. If they didn't invent the Tuck Rule he wouln't even be a topic. There for I say punish the punk. Tuck rule, knee rule, ball control rule and now the eligible receiver rule. I'd be curious how many other teams have had as many rules put in place because of something they were doing/wanted to do within a ~10 year span. Edited July 10, 2015 by The Wiz
Recommended Posts