elroy16 Posted June 23, 2015 Posted June 23, 2015 Here's something straight from one of the horse's mouths. http://www.buffalobills.com/video/audio/Jerry_Hughes_Striving_to_be_the_best_in_the_NFL/c04c9a60-50b4-421e-8511-93b307088426 John Murphy asked Jerry Hughes if the new coaching staff had anything to do with Jerry re-signing with Buffalo, Jerry gave a quick, definite yes. He went on to say (I'm paraphrasing), the front office brought in guys who have been successful and understand football and that played a part in him re-signing. Just a small thing, but he didn't sound too sold on the previous regime. Just a little something else, Murphy asked him about the defense dominating the offense so far, and Jerry said that the offense has had their days and EJ has looked good.
BuffaloBill Posted June 23, 2015 Posted June 23, 2015 http://bills.buffalonews.com/2015/06/22/vic-caruccis-take-five-bills-offseason-workouts/ "Intensive teaching. The coaches identified plenty that was wrong with the fundamentals of returning players. Although no one from the current staff is going to take public shots at the former staff, there is a clear sense that the new group doesn’t think all that highly of the some of the work done by the predecessors." Yikes at that entire paragraph. Just another reason to believe that this is going to be a fun year - our guys may actually know how to play NFL football! All the more reason to be happy that Marrone is gone.
ndirish1978 Posted June 23, 2015 Posted June 23, 2015 It's a discussion board. Your comments hardly ever contribute to discussion. Your posts all take the same basic formula: w2atd = wcd Here it is broken down: What Would a Troll Do = What Chan Does
Deranged Rhino Posted June 23, 2015 Posted June 23, 2015 Here's something straight from one of the horse's mouths. http://www.buffalobills.com/video/audio/Jerry_Hughes_Striving_to_be_the_best_in_the_NFL/c04c9a60-50b4-421e-8511-93b307088426 John Murphy asked Jerry Hughes if the new coaching staff had anything to do with Jerry re-signing with Buffalo, Jerry gave a quick, definite yes. He went on to say (I'm paraphrasing), the front office brought in guys who have been successful and understand football and that played a part in him re-signing. Just a small thing, but he didn't sound too sold on the previous regime. Just a little something else, Murphy asked him about the defense dominating the offense so far, and Jerry said that the offense has had their days and EJ has looked good. I didn't think that was a small thing at all. When I first heard that interview I was rolling. He took direct shots at Marrone, said he wouldn't have come back had there not been a coaching change, and raved about what a difference it makes to have competent coach's who are actually excited to coach. It's a must listen interview. SHOTS FIRED!
Malazan Posted June 23, 2015 Posted June 23, 2015 This is nothing new and always the same. Not just when Marone came in, but when Gailey/Wanny came in as well. Remember "biggest mistake Jerrah ever made was firing Gailey"? Anyone going out sucks and everyone coming in is great and the savior. Just the way it is. No harm in it, and is fun for some. Coaches saying that their players don't understand basic concepts is not exactly a feel good story.
Kelly the Dog Posted June 23, 2015 Posted June 23, 2015 I didn't think that was a small thing at all. When I first heard that interview I was rolling. He took direct shots at Marrone, said he wouldn't have come back had there not been a coaching change, and raved about what a difference it makes to have competent coach's who are actually excited to coach. It's a must listen interview. SHOTS FIRED! Yeah he clearly didn't like Marrone. Although I'm pretty sure that had to do with the fact that Marrone called him out in front of his fellow teammates in TC and screamed "Do you want to be on this team?!" and then of course forgot about him in the middle of a game which kept Hughes on the sidelines for almost a half. So those two things very likely made Hughes just hate him. But that has nothing to do with being a good football coach or knowing the NFL. Those things Marrone sucked at independently.
YoloinOhio Posted June 23, 2015 Posted June 23, 2015 Yeah he clearly didn't like Marrone. Although I'm pretty sure that had to do with the fact that Marrone called him out in front of his fellow teammates in TC and screamed "Do you want to be on this team?!" and then of course forgot about him in the middle of a game which kept Hughes on the sidelines for almost a half. So those two things very likely made Hughes just hate him. But that has nothing to do with being a good football coach or knowing the NFL. Those things Marrone sucked at independently. there were also guys from the defense (I recall AW specifically) who took shots at marrone during the season - saying the coach needs to trust the D more and take chances on offense when they are in position to still win a game and ... Punt.
John from Riverside Posted June 24, 2015 Posted June 24, 2015 And Marrone did that quite a bit in NO as the OC. Of course he also went to a bowl game with Cuse. So the old coaches also understood getting to the playoffs which not for a crap game against Oakland and Texans might have happened. Not sure if this is a serious post If it is...just take a step back and think about what you are saying.....and see if you dont understand why it is so wrong
Buffalo Barbarian Posted June 24, 2015 Posted June 24, 2015 http://bills.buffalonews.com/2015/06/22/vic-caruccis-take-five-bills-offseason-workouts/ "Intensive teaching. The coaches identified plenty that was wrong with the fundamentals of returning players. Although no one from the current staff is going to take public shots at the former staff, there is a clear sense that the new group doesn’t think all that highly of the some of the work done by the predecessors." Yikes at that entire paragraph. Just another reason to believe that this is going to be a fun year - our guys may actually know how to play NFL football! surprising that we won 9 games
BillsFan-4-Ever Posted June 24, 2015 Posted June 24, 2015 Your comments hardly ever contribute to discussion. Your posts all take the same basic formula: w2atd = wcd Here it is broken down: What Would a Troll Do = What Chan Does BRAVO !!! and no rebuttal again good job!!! and cue FireChan, in 3 2 1 ....
CSBill Posted June 24, 2015 Posted June 24, 2015 As stated above, the rest of the paragraph singles out Manuel, receivers, and OL. Coaching shortcomings for Manuel could be argued as a combination of Marrone/Hackett (last two years) and the QB coach last year. Relative to receivers, Moore's only coaching experience prior was Syracuse. To me the OL comment especially about techniqes is especially damning for Marrone - who was supposed to be spending so mch time with the OL and that being his 'specialty'. So glad those clowns are gone. Still so crazy to think they would all still be here if Marrone just said 'OK, I'll stay' I'm glad he's gone, and so far the new regime sounds good. But even with all the shortcomings of the last two years, we were still 9-7 and just one game away form the play-offs. Which speaks to the talent level on the team. Lets hope the improved coaching gets us over the hump.
MDH Posted June 24, 2015 Posted June 24, 2015 Your comments hardly ever contribute to discussion. Your posts all take the same basic formula: w2atd = wcd Here it is broken down: What Would a Troll Do = What Chan Does I'm not a fan of FireChan's posts but I wouldn't go this far. In fact, he contributes quite a bit to the board in that he helps create debate. Without some posters taking a contrarian view it would get incredibly boring having everybody generally agree on most topics. Of course, the posters that do this will be labeled "trolls" and be vilified but without them it would be a more stale environment. All that being said, I'm not sure I've ever agreed with FireChan but I do appreciate that he usually keeps his cool despite all the vitriol thrown his way.
klos63 Posted June 24, 2015 Posted June 24, 2015 From a different perspective, maybe the old coaches were teaching how to use these flawed players beyond their ability. Nothing to say the new guys are any better. Has Rex or Roman won a Super Bowl? i haven't checked to confirm, but weren't they both on a Ravens super bowl team?
Kelly the Dog Posted June 24, 2015 Posted June 24, 2015 i haven't checked to confirm, but weren't they both on a Ravens super bowl team? Rex was in 2000. Roman was there 2006-2007 I think when they didn't win a bowl.
Solomon Grundy Posted June 24, 2015 Posted June 24, 2015 I highly doubt that. He seems far too arrogant to think like that. If anything, he felt he was smarter than the Bills FO and wanted out to somewhere he could have more control and be revered for his 'genius.' Need a target and arrow emoji right now!! I think it's unrealistic to give Roman a complete pass on the season last year. Who worked with Kaep when he melted down? Do I think Roman was the chief reason the team was out of whack last year? No. Do I hold him at least a tiny bit responsible? Yes. You don't get a free pass just because your HC was also bad. Was Harbaugh or the FO responsible for the 49ers backslide? I mean Harbaugh got another job and a number of players left the team either by FA or retirement. I don't remember any of them quitting on Harbaugh.
C.Biscuit97 Posted June 24, 2015 Posted June 24, 2015 Need a target and arrow emoji right now!! Was Harbaugh or the FO responsible for the 49ers backslide? I mean Harbaugh got another job and a number of players left the team either by FA or retirement. I don't remember any of them quitting on Harbaugh. It's funny the use of trainwreck. They went 8-8 in one of the best divisions in the NFL. Defenses played Kaepernick differently, much like Vick, and he struggled to adjust. They also had a bunch of injuries.
Heitz Posted June 24, 2015 Author Posted June 24, 2015 I didn't think that was a small thing at all. When I first heard that interview I was rolling. He took direct shots at Marrone, said he wouldn't have come back had there not been a coaching change, and raved about what a difference it makes to have competent coach's who are actually excited to coach. It's a must listen interview. SHOTS FIRED! What does Hughes know? Is he even a member of TBD? If not, he has no credibility to speak about what's going on internally with the Buffalo Bills...
GunnerBill Posted June 25, 2015 Posted June 25, 2015 Was Harbaugh or the FO responsible for the 49ers backslide? I mean Harbaugh got another job and a number of players left the team either by FA or retirement. I don't remember any of them quitting on Harbaugh. Oh the problems started in the locker room - it started as a rebellion against Harbaugh. I think Jim Harbaugh is a good football coach and he is a guy who can have an immediate impact.... but he is too intense... it cost him a Superbowl where his team came out so wired that they completely tightened up and by the time they let loose and started to play the game had all but gone and it also explains why he grates on guys after a while. The front office then didn't help. The best way to quell a rebellion was to give Harbaugh a new contract and show that the organisation was behind him, which would have encouraged the players to fall in line. Instead they undermined him, especially when news was leaked that they considered trading him to the Browns.
eball Posted June 25, 2015 Posted June 25, 2015 (edited) Oh the problems started in the locker room - it started as a rebellion against Harbaugh. I think Jim Harbaugh is a good football coach and he is a guy who can have an immediate impact.... but he is too intense... it cost him a Superbowl where his team came out so wired that they completely tightened up and by the time they let loose and started to play the game had all but gone and it also explains why he grates on guys after a while. The front office then didn't help. The best way to quell a rebellion was to give Harbaugh a new contract and show that the organisation was behind him, which would have encouraged the players to fall in line. Instead they undermined him, especially when news was leaked that they considered trading him to the Browns. The very reasons why Harbaugh ultimately failed in the NFL will serve him well in college -- I think he's probably the perfect college coach. Players only have to listen to him for 3-4 years and are constantly rotating through. UM is going to be back in the national picture very soon. Edited June 25, 2015 by eball
chris heff Posted June 25, 2015 Posted June 25, 2015 It's funny the use of trainwreck. They went 8-8 in one of the best divisions in the NFL. Defenses played Kaepernick differently, much like Vick, and he struggled to adjust. They also had a bunch of injuries.I don't think that "train wreck" necessarily refers only to the 49ers record. The situation with Harbaugh was hanging over that team all season. The FO didn't try and fix it they fueled it. Everything that has happened since just confirms what a mess they are. The Bills were considered a train wreck when Marrone quit and Polian turned Pegula down, however the moves made by the Bills since then have them in playoff discussions. The Bills took adversity and dealt with it. The 49ers not so much.
Recommended Posts