3rdnlng Posted August 27, 2015 Posted August 27, 2015 And Dave in Norfolk is no longer the biggest racist. The hits just keep on coming with this guy. Dave in Norfolk? Dave in Elma was the one you guys lamb basted as a racist. I usually stuck up for the guy since few or none of his posts were individually racist, but after the first hundred or so referring to blacks I figured out that there had to be an agenda there.
GG Posted August 27, 2015 Posted August 27, 2015 Dave in Norfolk? Dave in Elma was the one you guys lamb basted as a racist. I usually stuck up for the guy since few or none of his posts were individually racist, but after the first hundred or so referring to blacks I figured out that there had to be an agenda there. Yup, it was definitely the Elma dude.
4merper4mer Posted August 27, 2015 Posted August 27, 2015 So what do you guys think about Trump's new campaign poster? http://twt-thumbs.washtimes.com/media/image/2015/08/26/gunman_s878x918.jpg?9300b3ccffdd437968616acd1b80788ffa6580b1 WTF? Peter Pan links are one thing but tricking someone into clicking on that? Tweet analysis: First, my feelings,. Second, my agenda. Third, oh right, the victims. How very Hillary You left out the cutesy signature which favors hipness over sincerity.
B-Man Posted August 27, 2015 Posted August 27, 2015 (edited) Obama’s Political Two-for-One: Using a Black Racist’s Murders to Blame Guns and Minimize the Terror Threat by David French Earlier today I was urging caution in ascribing racial motives to the Virginia shooting. While there’s certainly evidence the shooter was deeply disturbed, the evidence is now overwhelming that this shooting was in large part about race. The shooter wanted vengeance for Charleston, he wanted a “race war,” and he was known for angry, unfounded accusations of racial persecution: ’Why did I do it? I put down a deposit for a gun on 6/19/15. The Church shooting in Charleston happened on 6/17/15…’ ’ What sent me over the top was the church shooting. And my hollow point bullets have the victims’ initials on them.’ ’As for Dylann Roof? You [redacted]! You want a race war [redacted]? BRING IT THEN YOU WHITE …[redacted]!!!” . . . He goes on to say that he has faced both racial and sexual discrimination as a black, gay man and that he was just waiting to explode. So, how does the President of the United States respond? It’s the guns of course, and the guns are worse than terrorists. No, I’m not making this up: His quote: “It breaks my heart every time you read about or hear about these kinds of incidents,” Obama said. “What we know, is that the number of people who die from gun-related incidents around this country dwarfs any deaths that happen through terrorism.” So now we’re using domestic racial violence to not just bolster the case for gun control but also to diminish the threat of international terrorism? This statement is almost beyond belief — even for Obama. Look for the shooting to trigger another round of gun control proposals, none of which would have stopped this crime. As for terrorism? The hundreds of thousands of victims of jihadist violence since 2009 could not be reached for comment. Nor could the recently-gassed Kurds. Nor could the young Yazidi sex slaves. Nor could Iranian nuclear scientists. They’re too busy trying to engineer the apocalypse. Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/corner The Virginia Shooter Passed a Background Check by Charles C. W. Cooke Buzzfeed confirms that the shooter passed a background check: Thomas Faison, a spokesman for the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, told BuzzFeed News Wednesday that investigators had recovered a Glock 19 pistol that belonged to Flanagan. Faison said the gun had been purchased “weeks ago,” and that he had apparently passed a required background check. They pretty much always do. Why does this matter? Well, because Terry McAuliffe today suggested that this incident showed the need for background checks on private sales. Because Hillary Clinton said that we need to “do something” — most likely extend the background check system. Because the White House once again proposed “sensible” gun control. Because a host of instant experts on social media suggested that if we Second Amendment advocates would get on board with reform, this could have been prevented. And what do these people want, when pushed? They want an “assault weapons” ban; they want a magazine-size limit; and they want background checks on private sales. And, clearly, they are quite happy to point to this incident in order to make their case. But, as we now know, this shooting has nothing to do with any of these things. The killer used a Glock 19 handgun, which is not an “assault weapon” in any universe. He fired eight shots in total. And he bought his gun legally from a dealer. In other words, he did nothing that even intersects with their coveted laws. Once again, one gets the horrible impression that the gun-control movement is in possession of a laundry list of desires, and that they bring it out whenever anything bad happens, relevance be damned . . . Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/corner Edited August 27, 2015 by B-Man
TakeYouToTasker Posted August 27, 2015 Posted August 27, 2015 Dave in Norfolk? Dave in Elma was the one you guys lamb basted as a racist. I usually stuck up for the guy since few or none of his posts were individually racist, but after the first hundred or so referring to blacks I figured out that there had to be an agenda there. You're right. Apologies to Dave in Norfolk.
Ozymandius Posted August 27, 2015 Posted August 27, 2015 Oh no, not racism! lol We need to de-power that word. I'm happy to be called a racist. I hope one day we can have a world where a white man can approach a black guy on the streets and call him a nagger, and the black guy will reply with "hey, you honkey," and then they high-five before separating to go to work as small business owners that create jobs.
Chef Jim Posted August 27, 2015 Posted August 27, 2015 Oh no, not racism! lol We need to de-power that word. I'm happy to be called a racist. I hope one day we can have a world where a white man can approach a black guy on the streets and call him a nagger, and the black guy will reply with "hey, you honkey," and then they high-five before separating to go to work as small business owners that create jobs. Just !@#$ing stop!
Ozymandius Posted August 27, 2015 Posted August 27, 2015 Just !@#$ing stop! Would that not be a delightful world to live in? We need to stop having freaking words hold power over us.
Chef Jim Posted August 27, 2015 Posted August 27, 2015 Would that not be a delightful world to live in? We need to stop having freaking words hold power over us. You know you bring up a good point you !@#$ing dumbass!
DC Tom Posted August 27, 2015 Posted August 27, 2015 Would that not be a delightful world to live in? We need to stop having freaking words hold power over us. You're a !@#$ing idiot.
TakeYouToTasker Posted August 27, 2015 Posted August 27, 2015 Oh no, not racism! lol We need to de-power that word. I'm happy to be called a racist. I hope one day we can have a world where a white man can approach a black guy on the streets and call him a nagger, and the black guy will reply with "hey, you honkey," and then they high-five before separating to go to work as small business owners that create jobs. Obviously united over stuffing millions of Latinos into ovens.
meazza Posted August 27, 2015 Posted August 27, 2015 Obviously united over stuffing millions of Latinos into ovens. Will also solve the energy crisis.
Joe Miner Posted August 27, 2015 Posted August 27, 2015 You're right. Apologies to Dave in Norfolk. Maybe Ozy is Dave in Elma? Same stupidity, and the racism keeps leaking out more and more with each post.
GG Posted August 27, 2015 Posted August 27, 2015 Maybe Ozy is Dave in Elma? Same stupidity, and the racism keeps leaking out more and more with each post. The Donald welcomes his support.
Maury Ballstein Posted August 27, 2015 Posted August 27, 2015 Oh no, not racism! lol We need to de-power that word. I'm happy to be called a racist. I hope one day we can have a world where a white man can approach a black guy on the streets and call him a nagger, and the black guy will reply with "hey, you honkey," and then they high-five before separating to go to work as small business owners that create jobs. Tales from the trailer park ? How's that camo hat holding up ?
Chef Jim Posted August 27, 2015 Posted August 27, 2015 (edited) Tales from the trailer park ? How's that camo hat holding up ? I was back in WNY recently and drove through Elma. It all makes sense now. I heard banjo music. Edited August 27, 2015 by Chef Jim
TH3 Posted August 27, 2015 Posted August 27, 2015 "Yeah, the presence of a guy who will murder people on camera leads me to the conclusion I should be disarmed. And once again, the White House implies that “gun violence” is on the increase. It’s not. http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/423112/white-house-lies-about-gun-violence-again-charles-c-w-cooke …" Yes - the rate of gun violence has gone down - From the highest in first world countries to....the highest in first world countries.... We have the most liberal gun rights around ....and with freedoms comes some ugliness....
Alaska Darin Posted August 27, 2015 Posted August 27, 2015 We have the most liberal gun rights around No "we" don't.
boyst Posted August 27, 2015 Posted August 27, 2015 Oh no, not racism! lol We need to de-power that word. I'm happy to be called a racist. I hope one day we can have a world where a white man can approach a black guy on the streets and call him a nagger, and the black guy will reply with "hey, you honkey," and then they high-five before separating to go to work as small business owners that create jobs. ok then why censor yourself? be bold and say it. We have the most liberal gun rights around ....and with freedoms comes some ugliness.... why do people always tend to start arguments with such an emboldened statement? there is no arguing with a person who does this, even when they are factually wrong and that's the point. when you start an argument as matter of fact and the fact is wrong the argument is then null. you fail at this. but im an idiot so what do i know?
KD in CA Posted August 27, 2015 Posted August 27, 2015 You're right. Apologies to Dave in Norfolk. Wasn't Dave in Norfolk just one of the iterations on the molson_golden/conner/gatorman persona?
Recommended Posts