Deranged Rhino Posted June 8, 2015 Author Posted June 8, 2015 No, I don't think your are drunk, just a frustrated idiot. On that note, I'm out Run away. It's about the only thing you've proven to be competent at in this forum. As an absurdist and a genius, I reject this reasoning. I can make sense in a nonsensical thread. I am that good. Maybe you're drunk on bitters? :lol:
B-Man Posted June 8, 2015 Posted June 8, 2015 G7 Leaders agree to phase out fossil fuel use by 2100 .
B-Large Posted June 8, 2015 Posted June 8, 2015 There is a strong possibility that in far less than 85 years that will be a reality.... How bold of them.
....lybob Posted June 8, 2015 Posted June 8, 2015 There is a strong possibility that in far less than 85 years that will be a reality.... How bold of them. yep, that's what I was thinking
Nanker Posted June 8, 2015 Posted June 8, 2015 Yes. Iran and North Korea (the Best Korea) will likely nuke us all back to the stone age long before then.
Rob's House Posted June 9, 2015 Posted June 9, 2015 Are there any proposals for what will replace fossil fuels?
DC Tom Posted June 9, 2015 Posted June 9, 2015 Are there any proposals for what will replace fossil fuels? Hot air generated by the G7.
Azalin Posted June 9, 2015 Posted June 9, 2015 Hot air generated by the G7. Judging by the average age of those in attendance, I'd still call that fossil fuel.
....lybob Posted June 9, 2015 Posted June 9, 2015 Are there any proposals for what will replace fossil fuels? Solar PV and concentrated, wind, geothermal, wave, hydro, nuclear, bio-fuels, - better efficiency ( LED lighting, geothermal exchange heating and cooling, better insulation, use of passive solar, vehicle light-weighting, electric vehicles, fuel cell vehicles, more efficient- refrigeration, screens, chips, electric motors, pumps, fluid movement, electrical transmission lines, etc) - energy storage ( batteries, super- capacitors, heat, chemical, pressure, gravity)
Deranged Rhino Posted June 9, 2015 Author Posted June 9, 2015 Judging by the average age of those in attendance, I'd still call that fossil fuel.
Rob's House Posted June 9, 2015 Posted June 9, 2015 (edited) Solar PV and concentrated, wind, geothermal, wave, hydro, nuclear, bio-fuels, - better efficiency ( LED lighting, geothermal exchange heating and cooling, better insulation, use of passive solar, vehicle light-weighting, electric vehicles, fuel cell vehicles, more efficient- refrigeration, screens, chips, electric motors, pumps, fluid movement, electrical transmission lines, etc) - energy storage ( batteries, super- capacitors, heat, chemical, pressure, gravity) That's the one I was looking for. Not that the others don't have their place, but if they're serious about making a significant reduction in global fossil fuel consumption that's really the only realistic option I see. Interestingly, most "green" types are opposed to that too. Edited June 9, 2015 by Rob's House
3rdnlng Posted June 9, 2015 Posted June 9, 2015 That's the one I was looking for. Not that the others don't have their place, but if they're serious about making a significant reduction in global fossil fuel consumption that's really the only realistic option I see. Interestingly, most "green" types are opposed to that too. The "green" types are fueled by hope and change and not much else. We should be gradually but steadily switching over to cleaner fuels than coal and refined oil. Natural gas seems like a good option as we also develop alternate clean energy sources. Since natural gas is not a fossil fuel (per Nancy Pelosi) we could send her to the next G7 meeting to inform the members of that fact. Just doing our share.
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted June 10, 2015 Posted June 10, 2015 G7 Leaders agree to phase out fossil fuel use by 2100 . http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3368693,00.html Not much different
ExiledInIllinois Posted June 10, 2015 Posted June 10, 2015 Dreamers gotta dream. Yeah... And in 1928 the Kellog-Briand Pact was signed. War will not be used to settle disputes... LMAO... Okay, whatever.
reddogblitz Posted June 10, 2015 Posted June 10, 2015 (edited) Yes. Iran and North Korea (the Best Korea) will likely nuke us all back to the stone age long before then. That's gonna take a lot of nukes. We dropped 2 on Japan and they were still nowhere near the Stone Age. And America is probably 50 - 100 times bigger. (Guessing) Edited June 10, 2015 by reddogblitz
blzrul Posted June 10, 2015 Posted June 10, 2015 As long as they drop them on red states we'll be ok. Well, wait...many of them are already in the stone age. Still.
Azalin Posted June 11, 2015 Posted June 11, 2015 As long as they drop them on red states we'll be ok. Well, wait...many of them are already in the stone age. Still. Yep, good old stone-age Texas, #1 economy and fastest growing state in the nation. Are there any lefties in the US that aren't bitter and angry all the time?
Chef Jim Posted June 11, 2015 Posted June 11, 2015 As long as they drop them on red states we'll be ok. Well, wait...many of them are already in the stone age. Still. Why do you even bother dropping by?
Azalin Posted June 11, 2015 Posted June 11, 2015 Why do you even bother dropping by? To remind us that Gator's got competition.
3rdnlng Posted June 11, 2015 Posted June 11, 2015 To remind us that Gator's got competition. They should hook up and become the proud parents of a pet rock.
Recommended Posts