Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Posted

It really depends on the assessment method. The margin of error is really quite wide...again depending on the method. Like everything in the NFL, individual measurements are used to compare against a population. Each team may use different methods which makes consistency/accuracy a challenge. Case in point, Jeff Burris routinely was calculated as having almost 0% body fat using the Bod Pod.

 

With a margin of error of 5%-15%, BMI is best used (and, to be fair, usually is) as a complement to other metrics.

Posted

Yeah I doubt that...even the lowest percentage bodybuilders taking fat shredding steroids and completely dehydrating themselves before competitions are usually only 3%...

Posted (edited)

Ironically Jameis was his college roommate and his physique has been criticized with assumption that he doesn't eat well.

 

Assumption? The entire world knows what he eats. I don't even need to say it.

Edited by Rex'sOffense
Posted

John Miller's pretty low for a linemen as well -- 11.5% -- the second lowest measurement for any OL at the combine.

 

He may be short for an OG, but he's a solid 300-pounds...

 

 

Posted (edited)

Not even joking- is that healthy?!? I'm no expert but it seems crazy

Lance Armstrongs BPM are at around 30-35 for a cyclist. For the average person they would be hospitalized and when hooked up to a heart monitor it would be going crazy and it would show a flat line with a little blip every so often. Unless you are a doctor it's hard to say about the body fat thing. Things are different for athletes who train for specific things vs. us the average individual.

Edited by BuffaloBillsForever
×
×
  • Create New...