#34fan Posted May 4, 2015 Posted May 4, 2015 Straight from the Kype himself... http://espn.go.com/blog/buffalo-bills/post/_/id/18654/mel-kiper-grades-bills-draft-as-nfls-worst
Kirby Jackson Posted May 4, 2015 Posted May 4, 2015 He's mad that we didn't add a bad QB to the mix. We should have listened to him on Jimmy Clausen and we would have our QB situation solved!!
Max997 Posted May 4, 2015 Posted May 4, 2015 It wasn't a very impressive draft by the Bills I don't like the Darby pick at all but at least he won't be forced into starting his rookie year like McKelvin and Gilmore were
PromoTheRobot Posted May 4, 2015 Posted May 4, 2015 (edited) LOL of course it was. Why would Kiper break the streak of hating Bills drafts? 2013: Kiper also felt that Oregon linebacker Kiko Alonso (was) potential reaches in the second. Edited May 4, 2015 by PromoTheRobot
Mike in Horseheads Posted May 4, 2015 Posted May 4, 2015 He works for ESPN, no wonder they have a problem with Buffalo except Berman, Kornheiser and Wilbon.
Lurker Posted May 4, 2015 Posted May 4, 2015 (edited) Nothing wrong with a C-. We didn't have a first and the even though Darby, Miller and O'Leary will see the field, they won't be hugh difference makers in 2015, given the talent already on the roster. Still satisfied with the draft and now let's sign a few more vets and move on to SJF... Edited May 4, 2015 by Lurker
TPS Posted May 4, 2015 Posted May 4, 2015 Definitely the most underwhelming draft since that last time they didn't have a R1 pick--2005. That said, grades are meaningless until at least two years after each draft.
TallskiWallski83 Posted May 4, 2015 Posted May 4, 2015 So says the guy who routinely criticized seattles drafts for several years until they started to go to superbowls.
/dev/null Posted May 4, 2015 Posted May 4, 2015 Mel Kiper's hair was the worst of any of the draft analysts on ESPN or NFLN I give his hair a C+
jimmy10 Posted May 4, 2015 Posted May 4, 2015 I don't mind when talking heads say stupid things to generate clicks and ratings. That's how they get paid. I do mind when they try to pass themselves off as "experts" when they are anything but. Let us not forget when this haircut thought Jamarcus Russell was the next John Elway. http://content.usatoday.com/communities/gameon/post/2010/05/jamarcus-russell-reminded-mel-kiper-jr-of-john-elway/1#.VUa57Ib3bCQ
Chuck Wagon Posted May 4, 2015 Posted May 4, 2015 He also said we could have gotten Mike Evans staying at 9 last year. Ridiculous calling Darby a reach. There's a handful of blue chip guys in every class, then a large group that could go anywhere from 1st to the 3rd depending on team needs and teams boards. Darby is squarely in that group. Just because Kiper thinks he belongs in the 60s and he goes 50 doesn't make it a reach.
YoloinOhio Posted May 4, 2015 Posted May 4, 2015 He gave seattle a D the year they took bruce Irvin and russell Wilson and the Bills an A when they took Maybin. I know he studies these guys in college for a living, but his ability to project to their NFL success/ scheme fit /understanding of teams roster forecasting is questionable at best.
Chuck Wagon Posted May 4, 2015 Posted May 4, 2015 (edited) "I gave the Bills a hard time in the draft grades last year because I thought they paid far too steep a price to move up for Sammy Watkins, given how many good WRs were in that draft. Watkins is going to be just fine, but Mike Evans and Odell Beckham, Jr. could have both been taken without moving up, and that move up now factors into the grade this year, when the Bills didn't have a first-rounder and simply couldn't add the same amount of talent as other teams. I thought Ronald Darby was a reach in Round 2 at No. 50. There's a lot of natural ability with him, but I didn't have CB as nearly the biggest need, and I don't think he was the best player available, either. I'm a lot higher on the third-round selection of John Miller, a physical force in the run game, which they need to succeed to take some pressure off whoever is taking the QB snaps. (There's some buzz that Tyrod Taylor could be really pushing for that role, by the way.) Karlos Williams provides some depth at running back, but I'm not sure how much they needed it, and I might have looked at one of a number of values to be had at linebacker in that range. That said, if Rex said he needed it on defense, my guess is they would have made the move. Nick O'Leary can stick because the competes like heck and can catch the ball. I also think Buffalo got one of the bigger steals in the draft in Dez Lewis, a big-bodied speedster out of Central Arkansas who doesn't look the least bit out of place from a physical and workout standpoint next to the first-round types. The Bills didn't need an amazing draft, thanks to good roster-building outside of QB. That's a good thing." -Kiper Edited May 4, 2015 by Chuck Wagon
DC Tom Posted May 4, 2015 Posted May 4, 2015 Different story, but same page, so... Darby was also involved in a hit-and-run accident last year when he and teammate P.J. Williams, the driver of the vehicle, fled the scene before returning 20 minutes later. "Involved?" He was a passenger when somebody else !@#$ed up. How the hell is that a character issue?
CNY315 Posted May 4, 2015 Posted May 4, 2015 Nobody has any idea how good any team's draft was at this point
Lurker Posted May 4, 2015 Posted May 4, 2015 He gave seattle a D the year they took bruce Irvin and russell Wilson and the Bills an A when they took Maybin. I know he studies these guys in college for a living, but his ability to project to their NFL success/ scheme fit /understanding of teams roster forecasting is questionable at best. Yep...spot on.
Augie Posted May 4, 2015 Posted May 4, 2015 So this is a good thing, right? Seriously, who do you trust more... Whaley or Mel?
ko12010 Posted May 4, 2015 Posted May 4, 2015 I gave the Bills a hard time in the draft grades last year because I thought they paid far too steep a price to move up for Sammy Watkins, given how many good WRs were in that draft. Watkins is going to be just fine, but Mike Evans and Odell Beckham, Jr. could have both been taken without moving up, and that move up now factors into the grade this year, when the Bills didn't have a first-rounder and simply couldn't add the same amount of talent as other teams. I thought Ronald Darby was a reach in Round 2 at No. 50. There's a lot of natural ability with him, but I didn't have CB as nearly the biggest need, and I don't think he was the best player available, either. I'm a lot higher on the third-round selection of John Miller, a physical force in the run game, which they need to succeed to take some pressure off whoever is taking the QB snaps. (There's some buzz that Tyrod Taylor could be really pushing for that role, by the way.) Karlos Williams provides some depth at running back, but I'm not sure how much they needed it, and I might have looked at one of a number of values to be had at linebacker in that range. That said, if Rex said he needed it on defense, my guess is they would have made the move. Nick O'Leary can stick because the competes like heck and can catch the ball. I also think Buffalo got one of the bigger steals in the draft in Dez Lewis, a big-bodied speedster out of Central Arkansas who doesn't look the least bit out of place from a physical and workout standpoint next to the first-round types. The Bills didn't need an amazing draft, thanks to good roster-building outside of QB. That's a good thing. Evans went to Tampa at 7
Lurker Posted May 4, 2015 Posted May 4, 2015 Draft pundits aren't much different than movie critics, music critics, wine critics, political analysts, money managers, doctors, lawyers, marriage counselors, newspaper columnists, economists, socialogists, meteologists, Jerry Sullivan (he deserves his own category)... http://www.shortlist.com/entertainment/films/bad-reviews-for-good-movies
Recommended Posts